Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Aristocracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Aristocracy
The basis of most governments we see in society today were formed when civilizations were just starting to become complex and were continuing to grow into largely populated areas. Without these governments being formed, society today might not be what we know it to be. The governments used and formed in ancient times shaped society into what it is today; but not without trial and error.

Aristocracy: is a system of government that places authority in the hands of a small group of privileged individuals (whom are almost always wealthy and educated). A few advantages of aristocracy include: the power is never resting upon the shoulders of one individual and cannot turn into a dictatorship, and the leaders selected to rule are deemed as “qualified” to make government decisions. There are other advantages within an aristocracy. As Diderot, Denis, and Edme-François Mallet said in “(The Encyclopedia
…show more content…
To give a better picture, say a king dies, he will be replaced by his eldest son unless directed otherwise. A monarchy is usually ruled by a family called a dynasty. There are three different forms of government as said in ("10 Principal Pros and Cons of Monarchy"). The three main forms of monarchy are: diarchy, tyranny, and absolute monarchy. A diarchy is where “two individuals share the position of heads of state”, a tyranny is “usually one of oppression and aggression”. While an absolute monarchy is “one which gives absolute power to the monarch over the people”. The pros of the general form of monarchy are: the amount of balance in the governance, there is less corruption, and there are no elections (thus: fewer expenses). The cons include: expensive lifestyles, one person (family, dynasty) in charge of an entire country, and if there is oppression that occurs, nothing can be done about it. Places that are considered a monarchy today include: Saudi Arabia and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using ancient Sparta as a case study, I would say that the Greeks did not place a lot of emphasis on monarch. In fact their perception and relationship to monarchy was very subdued .The Spartans operated a bi-monarchial system of monarchy .In essence; they did not value monarchy, in the sense that monarchy can only be practiced absolutely for it to have a true meaning.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many governments that affected civilization. A government is in charge of making sure the society is stable. Two great examples of these political figures are Russia under Peter the Great, and Germany under Adolf Hitler. Both of these bodies of government showed Change, Propaganda, and military power. These three things impacted their society in a big way, and the decisions there leaders made.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many of our terms for describing the distribution of political power are derived from the ancient Greeks, who were the first Western people to study politics systematically. A society in which political decisions were controlled by a small group was called an oligarchy, meaning rule by a few members of the elite, who generally benefited themselves. Another form of rule by the few was known as aristocracy, meaning rule by the most virtuous, the most talented, or the best suited to the position. Later in European history, aristocracy meant rule by the titled or the upper classes. In contrast to such a top-down form of control was the form known as anarchy, or the condition of no government. Anarchy exists when each individual makes his or her own rules for behavior, and there are no laws and no…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government is always a big factor in any civilization, if there is a good government the civilization will grow and thrive, but if after time that government becomes more and more corrupt the civilization will fall, this is a big factor of the cause of the downfall in Han China and The Roman Empire. Han was a thriving civilization much like Rome, but the government was slowly falling mainly due to emperors who neglected their…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many factors have contributed to the formulation and construction of modern-day American government. Among these factors, some ancient governments such as Athens and Rome have contributed ideas and structures. Although many differences exist between these ancient governments and America, there are still many similarities. The governments of Athens, Rome, and America have many differences, although Athens and Rome contributed many ideas to the formulation of American government.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanity needs government in order to thrive and progress. According to the documents that describe the Neolithic error, which will later be discussed in depth, the laws that were set up by government were there to guide the people in moral and spiritual conduct. Furthermore if it were not for the ‘social ladder’ created by government, there would be no aspiration for elevation which resulted in competition among the people. The government also generated the need for specialists. As the state grew, people began to specialize in various areas; the need for documentation in the form of writing grew, therefore scribes and artisans were established.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ancient Greek and Roman governments were pretty much the very first example of a Democratic government leading our government to become what it is now in the United States. Document A, which was part of a speech given by the Roman general Scipio in which he spoke about the system of the Roman government, he talked about how the constitution that Romans had was not created by an individuals. It also talks about the nobles who acted as representatives of the people and how their choices were not made without the consent of the citizens. This is like our modern government because our constitution was made by a group officials and not just one person, so there were many views, just like the Romans had. Our governments are also run by the representatives who listen to and support the ideas that the citizens have. Today we also have some of the same rights and opinions that the governments had then. Document B, which is a quote from an ancient Greek statesman, Pericles, tells what place the people had to him in the Greek Government when he said, “We do not say that a man who takes no interest in politics is a man who minds his own business; we say that he has no business here at all.” What he is trying to say is that it is the job of the citizens to be involved in the government, or they don’t have the right to complain about what the government does. Today, everybody is expected to take part in the politics of our government, even if it is doing something that is as simple as taking the time to vote in the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealthy Vs Rule

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Those who own the country, ought to govern it,” Is that what our country is based on? Wealth? The federalist believe this statement while the republicans have other opinions worth standing up for. Federalists believe the ones with wealth and goods are the ones with the power to rule as for the Democratic-Republicans believe the ones to follow are the ones who earn and work for it. Both have very different opinions over what is right and what is wrong, with more detail about both parties you will be able to choose who you believe in and want to follow.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A government is the political direction and control applied over the actions of members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states. Over the years several types of governments have been created and established to fit a distinct way of living. Every society has a government, and each one is different and/or similar from one another. Various ones are preferred more than others because they are more than likely not to corrupt. The way a government is ran is decided among the citizens of how efficient it will operate.…

    • 576 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The two concepts of the key term in Bardes that I find most difficult to understand is aristocracy and capitalism. Aristocracy is a hereditary class ruled by a small number of individuals or a noble family. Capitalism is an economic system that produces and distributes privately or co-owned development from accumulating and reinvesting profits gained in free markets. Since I’m not into politics, these two key term makes it hard for me to distinguish upon trying to understand what types of different governments there are.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitutional Analysis

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Monarchy functions by Parliament that consist of two houses which are the House of Lords and House of Commons. The House of Lords is a body of Monarch appointed by the Queen or King whereas the House of Commons is a body of elected officials voted in by the People. We have the Queen or King as the figurehead for our government. Parliament will be responsible but not limited to collecting taxes, declaring war, borrowing and coining money, naturalization, and impeachment. The people will have a say and with whom they elect into the House. There are more liberties that the people have but at regulated prices such as, the right to bear arms. People are allowed to bear arms but with more of a strict licensing to obtain a firearm. People have the right to marry no matter race, gender, preference, or religion. Also, gender equality and drinking and voting age are set at the legal age of 18 when people are able to join the military and risk their own life for their country. It doesn't seem to have many disadvantages as it is truly mixing royalty and commoners together. We made the terms and age which officials can…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governments get their power from the people. Since all people have the rights, the unalienable rights, people agree to form governments to protect their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A small group of noblemen led the government in an aristocracy. This was after the monarchies died out. Aristocracy is what is known as to be ruled by few. Overtime they eventually became an oligarchy. This is when rich citizens not of a noble birth were also allowed to participate. They did not offer citizens a say in their government and could also be as harsh and corrupt. A minority of men from rich families controlled the state. Sparta was one of the last with a successful oligarchy.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling class

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In practical life we all recognize the existence of this ruling class (or political class, as we have elsewhere chosen to define it). We all know that, in our own country, whichever it may be, the management of public affairs is in the hands of a minority of influential persons, to which management, willingly or unwillingly, the majority defer. We know that the same thing goes on in neighboring countries, and in fact we should be put to it to conceive of a real world otherwise organized—a world in which all men would be directly subject to a single person without relationships of superiority or subordination, or in which all men would share equally in the direction of political affairs. If we reason otherwise in theory, that is due partly to inveterate habits that we follow in our thinking and partly to the exaggerated importance that we attach to two political facts that loom far larger in appearance than they are in reality.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays