Preview

The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas Utilitarianism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas Utilitarianism Analysis
The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas is a very clear depiction of the principles of Utilitarianism through the little kid who is locked in the cellar. Utilitarianism says that is a solution that works the best for the greatest number of people. Everyone in Omelas is happy and live in a “perfect” world. Their joy is all resting on one kid who lives in the absolute worst living conditions by being locked in a cellar, not seeing the sun, and getting fed junk food. The whole society knows of this evil they have bestowed on the child but they come to realize that if they let this kid out that their happiness will be taken away so they come to terms with that in whatever way they can. Some are unable to come to terms with how they are treating the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “The Ones Who Walked Away,” the citizens and residents in this city seem to be happy and enjoy their life in the Omelas. Their life is full of peace and happiness even though they know the real reason for their happiness and the cruelty behind it. In the Omela’s the people know of the existence of a child who is living under terrible circumstances but yet they still go on with their lives as if though nothing is happening. The reason for this is because an unknown character placed terms on the city of Omelas where if they express some sort of compassion to the child suffering, all of their happiness and prosperity will change to the total opposite. In the text it states that, “They (referring to the people of Omelas) would like to do something…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another event from the story that makes one think is the people that walk away. Although the title tells you exactly what happens after you read the story this statement seems so “dull” to put it in one word. What I mean by “dull” is that question could just be answered by a simple “They just didn’t feel like being there” but there are deeper reasons behind it. Although I don’t know the true answer Le Guin had in mind I believe that the people in Omelas finally realized what was happening. The people that walk away from Omelas finally realized what Omelas did on the pursuit of happiness, they used one child’s suffering to make their lives seem perfect. The people that walk away from Omelas finally realize that their life really isn’t perfect, but that it just seemed perfect because that’s what they had always believed.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” criticizes our societies by comparing it to the citizens of Omelas whom lack aggression, embrace joy, and reject supreme control or prejudice. Unlike our societies, the people of Omelas avoid conflict and war. They were friendly and peaceful since, “They did not use swords… They were not barbarians.” Laws were not plentiful and police were not necessary due to this. The author portrays these traits as unusual which indirectly criticizes us. The author understands how countries and cities around the world are not as safe and peaceful compared to the Omelas. We are getting criticized since we do not learn from war and we cling onto our weapons. Our solutions are rarely solved through a compromise which usually leads to aggression and…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Omelas is an idea of utopia. It is an imaginary place where everything is perfect. Utopia is something absolutely necessary to social change with a perception of something better,filled with joy so the chances of social progress is high. However, someone's utopia may cause others to lose their freedom. In the short story "The ones who walked away from Omelas" by the author Ursula K. LeGuin is based on a message that shows how society sees their happiness through someone else's misery. After building a utopia, the narrator suddenly turns it into a morality problem. The residents from Omelas put an individual in contrast to a number of people acting as a group, to justify a small evil for a greater good.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then we move on to “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” where there are several characters: one (the child) who was forced to be the scapegoat, and al the ones who walked away from the community (many people). They all chose to be free from the scapegoat act of holding this child to support the community which was free of all major problems that many communities face…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, the Le Guin suggests the deeper flaws of Omelas through the exsistence of the basement child. "If [the child] were cleaned and fed and comforted...all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed." Before this part in the story, it shows the perfection of Omelas and their always, happy, emotion. However, the child is seen very different from the others. It feels emotions besides happiness such as being scared, unhappy, etc. This shows that Omelas isn't actually perfect, there is a deep flaw in which not much can tell right now away, but it is still…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ursula K. Le Guin’s Those Who Walk Away from Omelas encourages students to face the dark side of modern civilization and utilitarianism. It tells of a nearly perfect city, where most everyone is happy. They lead cultured, complex, fulfilling lives. The reader is told to imagine it as they wish; let it have whatever amount of technology they want, to add in things they think would make the city better, and generally make the city as good as is believable to the reader. The one flaw of the city is that its well-being depends on a single child be kept in torturous solitude. The child is innocent, desperate, and remembers life in the city, but cannot be allowed any kindness whatsoever. This puts forth the question of whether such a city is morally…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Does Omelas Show Guilt

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    You don’t feel guilt or anger for the suffering and troubles of complete strangers, but you do feel guilt and anger for the suffering of your family, friends, and your own self. You only care about the people close to you. This is the same in the almost perfect city of Omelas. The ones who stay don’t feel guilt over anything. Those in Omelas who stay are unjust for they feel no guilt over the wrongs they commit to the child for their personal gain. To remove the guilt they fell from themselves they dehumanize the child. They change it into an object or a beast, which plagues their city or a stain upon their otherwise perfect city.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula Le Guin concerns itself with the utopian society Omelas. The story begins with the festival of Summer where the town is described in all of it’s glory. From the beautiful streets, to the successful craftsmen, and the joyous people, Omelas seems to be perfect. What is not made immediately clear is the fact that the town’s perfection is contingent upon the misery of one child. The relationship is such that as along as the child is treated inhumanely, the citizens of Omelas will enjoy continued success and perfection. The town embodies the Utilitarian idea that the apparent suffering of one child is made less when compared to the good that is bestowed upon the rest of Omelas.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill 's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin 's "The One 's Who Walk Away from Omelas."…

    • 1220 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ursula K Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas,” the theme of scapegoatism and “ignorance is bliss” are very apparent. I see the theme of “ignorance is bliss” to be a fitting theme for this story because of all the secret wrongdoings that were happening within the story. The Omelas story starts out depicting a beautiful utopia in summer during a festival (249-250). Even from the beginning of the story, the reader gets this idea and belief that the people of this city live a blissful and endlessly happy life. However, the reader is then introduced to a darkness behind the happiness going on inside of the utopia.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using “Utilitarianism” by John Stuart Mill to compare the morality of the people who stay and the people who walk away in “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” by Ursula K. LeGuin it can be concluded that the people who stay in Omelas are morally superior to the people who leave. This is because “one person’s happiness, supposed equal in degree is counted for exactly as much as another’s,” meaning that one child’s happiness does not equal the collective happiness of the society. Omelas is a paradise, it is very unlikely that the people who leave will discover a more equal and just place. The world is littered with injustices, some seemingly hidden. The people who stay accept the inequalities of the society. They understand that their happiness is reliant on the suffering of the child. They are “capable of apprehending a community of interest between [themselves] and the human society of which [they] form a part,” proposing that even when they feel…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trapped by Society

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, the imprisonment and suffering of a child is accepted because it is advantageous for the society. The city of Omelas is perfect with one fundamental flaw, “their happiness… depend[s] wholly on this child’s abominable misery” (Le Guin 5) – the anguish of an imbecile condemned to a dark basement. There is nothing that can be done for this child because “all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed” (Le Guin 5) if even a kind word is spoken to it. Consequently, the child “sits in its own excrement continually,” (Le Guin 4) denied its natural rights to life and liberty. Natural law is an unwritten, universal moral code derived from nature, and it is inherent to all humanity – even those in Omelas. Therefore, when the citizens see the conditions of the child for the first time “they feel anger, outrage, impotence, despite all the explanations” (Le Guin 5). Each individual recognizes that the conditions of the child are intrinsically unjust, yet even with…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the administrator (in the case of schools) is forced to make a decision, the best choice is one that benefits the most people. The “end game justifies the means,” or the consequences of each action are determined on a case by case basis. The suitability of any decision is based on the consequences experienced and the morality of the decision is revealed by the results. Utilitarianism is a type of benefit maximization, which defends the actions (of the decision maker) that produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people involved.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 12907 Words
    • 52 Pages

    Many different ideas have been given the name ‘relativism’, and the term has been used to pillory all sorts of views (sometimes for good reasons, sometimes for bad ones). It is mere posturing to say that you are for or against “relativism” unless you say what you mean by the term. Here I want mainly to discuss (and to criticize) a view I have encountered among students in philosophy courses, who say things like this: "What anyone believes is true for that person. What you believe is true for you, what I believe is true for me." We can call the view expressed in such statements ‘relativism’ because it denies that there is any such thing as “absolute” truth, holds that all truth is relative to the person who believes it.…

    • 12907 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Better Essays