Preview

The Most Dangerous Game Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
735 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Most Dangerous Game Analysis
The Man With a Passion
Many people do not know the story known as the Most Dangerous Game. The author Richard Connell wasn’t a critically acclaimed author. But this story shot him up to fame. The story revolved around Rainsford and the hyper General Zaroff, who engaged in a wild hunt. The theme of this book mostly went on Zaroff. “Passion can drive a man insane.” is the main theme of this story. With evidence supporting our theme, such as his own childhood. Not to mention how he called his personal assistant Ivan a deaf and dumb person since both of them were Cossacks! Moreover, there had been a conversation between Zaroff and Rainsford that showed his past experiences, which then led to how he started hunting. It will be shown with Zaroff, that passion can indeed drive on insane.
The first point of evidence would be where Rainsford had arrived on the island
…show more content…
In the middle we were shown the second discussion or also what some like to call “the lunch conversation”. As Rainsford became horrified about Zaroff hunting humans, he then curiously questioned how can a man of his wealth commit such murder. To which Zaroff replied like this. “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong”. Zaroff has no principles or morality as may some call it. He only wanted to please himself and could go to any limits, due to his island being completely deserted. Since the island was owned by him, and the people he hunted couldn’t call for help or even escape his island, he had become a man of skill and agility. We were shown this when the hunt had actually begun. When Rainsford set a trap known as the Malay man-catcher, it seemed as if Zaroff had come across this in his previous hunting’s. “Not many men know how to make a Malay man-catcher. Luckily for me, I too have hunted in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In "Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Cornell, Zaroff reveals strength, ingenuity, and a selfishness through his murderous and questionable methods of hunting.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is composed of character, setting and conflict. One of the critical themes in the short story is irony, which plays a major role in the story. There is irony in the setting, a remote jungle island, the conflict, murder verses hunting, and the characters, General Zaroff who is a crazed man-hunter and Mr. Rainsford, his prey.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Most Dangerous Game”, a short story by Richard Connell, is about… Sanger Rainsford that has lived his life hunting, but abruptly becoming the hunted. By a man named General Zaroff that made a game where he hunts human beings. General Zaroff was also grew up hunting. When Rainsford entered his dining, the hall was bewildering by all the heads of animals and the tasteful silver, linens, and china. Soon after he forced Mr. Rainsford to play his game, he started playing with Rainsford by smiling before he saw him on the tree and when Rainsford arrived in his bedroom, he didn’t act defeated he said someone will be sleeping in this…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Rainsford first meets Zaroff, Zaroff is courteous, hospitable, and honorable; he takes Rainsford in, gives him clothes, dinner, wine, and a place to stay. However throughout the course of the evening and dinner, Zaroff's character takes a drastic and radical darkening. "The weak [men] of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure," (Connell 799) says Zaroff over a glass of wine. "I am strong," (Connell 799) he continues to say. Zaroff hunted captured humans as a hobby and a sport! Rainsford is appalled at this, and Zaroff eventually continues to tell Rainsford of his intention to hunt him: "You'll find this game worth playing...Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" (Connell 801). Zaroff is so corrupt that he doesn't even understand what he is doing is wrong; he appears so nice on the outside, but his words and actions show his…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollern Men and Beasts One might shudder at the thought of being hunted by another man. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Richard Connell reveals the idea of being hunted and slain by another man is all too real. In this story Rainsford finds himself stranded on an island whilst being hunted by General Zaroff who happens to be a skilled hunter in his own right. In this short story the line between man and beast is clouded and the fight between logic and instinct ensues. In this story Rainsford finds that the difference between man and beast is a thin one.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Connell depicts the characters in The Most Dangerous Game as people who used to be sane but are now insane. While Rainsford is in being hunted by General Zaroff, he is slowly but surely turning into a lunatic in order to keep himself alive. Connell writes, “to this end, he had plunged along, spurred by the sharp rowels of something very like panic”(Connell 28). Connell highlights Rainsford’s transition in becoming deranged with “plunged along” and “spurred by the sharp rowells”. While he could have chose to stay sane, his mind got the best of him,…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially the setting of the story is on a yacht in the Caribbean. Rainsford is involved in small talk with his friend, Whitney, and the conversation is about their favorite hobby, hunting big game. The fact that these men could afford a hunting trip to the Amazon speaks of their wealth, and these men have apparently taken several trips together. General Zaroff is not unlike Rainsford in this respect. From his childhood, Zaroff has been living in the lap of luxury. The General's father owned "a quarter of a million acres in the Crimea," and gave his son a gun when his son was only five years old. From this early indoctrination into the hunt, the General became a man that not only enjoyed hunting, but his fulfillment in life depended on the hunt. Both Rainsford and Zaroff are wealthy, and both love hunting, but their views of the subject are radically different.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an action movie, producers and directors add certain music to certain scenes to make them more suspenseful, sad, etc. Many authors add details to a story about the setting to accomplish the same goal. In the story, Most Dangerous Game, the author adds many details about the dark night, General Zaroff’s mansion, and the jungle to add more suspense, or terror, to the story.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyday there are disagreements between people who are trying to decide if they should go to the right or left, or if the glass is half full or half empty. They have small arguments on the ways their opinions are different, even though there might be something similar between the two. Every person’s opinion and the way they take action is different depending on where they are coming from and what their previous experiences are. In movie High Noon and the story “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are characters that disagree because their ideas are coming from their past experiences or the things that are surrounded by. In both stories there are the main characters who have enemies that come up against them making the main characters need to fight back. In both of these their are different components that come into play that make up part of the story. In High Noon and “The Most Dangerous…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ the most dangerous game.” This “game” is the hunting of people. Rainsford is disgusted by Zaroff’s new game animal. Rainsford refuses to hunt with Zaroff, which offends Zaroff, and instead is hunted by Zaroff. Rainsford and Zaroff initially admire each other’s love of the sport of hunting. Zaroff greets Rainsford with high respect and as a hero, “It is a great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home,” (4). Zaroff flatters Rainsford by talking of his publications,…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps one of the reasons that “The Most Dangerous Game” is still read to this day may be because of the ambiguous ending that this short story has. The way the story is left off leads the reader to many different conclusions as to what happened. Perhaps the two most common inferences would be that either Rainsford realizes that he is becoming like Zaroff, or Rainsford realizes that he is nothing like Zaroff and takes comfort in this. There is much evidence that supports both of these theories.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the story's protagonist Sanger Rainsford is hunted throughout the jungle of an uninhabited island, by General Zaroff a man who is fixated on hunting humans for sport. In the short story “Lady or the Tiger?” by Frank Stockton, an imperious, semi-barbaric king rules over his kingdom with an iron fist, when his daughter falls in love with a young man he uses this opportunity to put the man in a public arena, where his is given the option of marriage or death. Both authors create villainous characters…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once Zaroff revealed what his “most dangerous game” was, he attempted to justify his murderous hobby by arguing that, “‘I am strong...If I wish to hunt why should I not,’”(10). Here, Zaroff is committing a standard mistake; he does something because he can, but morally should not. The only way he actually justifies his “game” is by saying that it is diverting and provides a challenge for him. The belief that he is all-powerful blinds him from the fact that since he has frequently perpetrated against innocent humans, he will have to pay for his actions. Furthermore, Zaroff concluded that Rainsford had perished, but he is later proven wrong. As an illustration, “A man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there… ‘I congratulate you’... ‘You have won the game,’”(18). Connell uses this event to affirm that Zaroff had indeed been hunted all along. Although he did not realize it, Zaroff was gradually falling prey to Rainsford. The American was constantly outsmarting him and made numerous attempts on his life. Throughout the story Rainsford was gaining leverage; it is clear he won because Zaroff was cocky and ignorant of his surroundings. In Zaroff’s case, the very thing that made him powerful debilitated…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a survivor you need 3 important traits , dedication, craftiness, and intelligence. In the most dangerous games, Rainsford, a hunter who survived being hunted in the woods for 4-5 days. Zaroff another hunter who lived on the island trapped Rainsford on the island and hunted him for trophy. Rainsford spent those days running and making traps to try and escape Zaroff. It shows craftiness because he built his traps made from things he found in the jungle. And it shows intelligent because he knew how to avoid zaroff and survive. It shows determined because he never gave up.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dangerous game

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Commercial fiction is meant to excite the reader, to help them escape reality and "The Most Dangerous Game" has both mystery and suspense do to the nature of the continuous adventure throughout the story. This forces the reader to continuously read on to discover the next piece of the puzzle or the next twist that may occur. This could be shown through the two characters in their continuous ultimate battle against one another, this giving the example of man vs man. The two characters include, the Protagonist, Sangor Rainsford and the Antagonist, General Zaroff. Both characters present themselves to be stock characters, Rainsford being recognized world-wide for his writing and considered to be known as the western “good guy”, whereas Zaroff is made out to be the “bad guy” a recognizable Russian, with facial elements such as his thick eyebrows along with a pointed military mustache. Russians being strong enemies to the West, this begins to demonstrate elements of good vs evil. Commercial fiction is also expected to have a defined plot, majority of the time people refer to this specific plot as “page turner”.Rainsford built a Malay man-catcher and a Burmese tiger pit to try and escape Zaroff. After these traps have been set, the reader can’t help but wonder whether it is going to serve its purpose and work in his favor. After finding out the results of the traps, you can’t help but wonder what will happen next. Towards the end of the hunt, Rainsford “leaped far out into the sea.” As the reader reads this, they can’t help but wonder what Rainsford was thinking and what was going to happen to him.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays