Preview

The Missouri Compromise Was To Outlaw Slavery

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Missouri Compromise Was To Outlaw Slavery
The Missouri Compromise outlawed the growth of slavery and involuntary servitude above the Mason Dixon Line which is located north of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes, north latitude. Since slavery was outlawed in the north it limited the growth of slavery across the country. The North did not like idea of slavery because they had the same idea of abolitionist. There was also a greater consequence for having slaves. The idea of abolitionist was to outlaw slavery because the need for slaves was very low in the northern part of the country. The South did not find a problem in slavery because the slaves saved the south a lot of labor and money. The Missouri Compromise was a big step in our countries process in outlawing slavery. Many southern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Give two ordered pairs that are solutions and two ordered pairs that are not solutions.…

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fugitive Slaves Law legalized officers of the law to arrest any runaway slaves. The first major compromises reached between the slave states and the Free states to create and preserve the Union are the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act. In 1820 the Missouri Compromise was established and the unequal balance of slave states and Free states were solved by making Missouri a slave state and Maine a Free state, this compromise also divided the rest of the Louisiana Purchase into slave and free land.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the war with Mexico, the North and South were having some issues with slavery and the more or less under control of slavery. With the Missouri Compromise they had settled which areas would have slavery and which they would not. And of course, there was still tensions between the North and South about slavery. With the war with Mexico the change with what to make of slavery was making tensions the were much more intense. The war with Mexico led to the taking of huge amounts of land, by the saying that the US had decided that the status of slavery in the new territories that was Mexico’s land.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like I said before the South broke compromises to keep slavery going (Doc 1). The South felt like they had rights and powers the government could not deny (Doc 5). The South felt overpowered by the government and that is why they overridden compromises and led to states seceding from the Union. Southern states did not want follow the rules of the government so it could start a war and make them want to…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court in this case, essentially threw out the Missouri Compromise, which was essentially only legislation keeping the battle between free states and slave states at bay. The Missouri Compromise was the only remaining bandage left covering the wound between the northern and southern states, due to the division of slave ownership. The reason behind labeling the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional is due to the fact that congress has no power to pass any legislature concerning personal property, and by doing so would infringe upon individuals personal rights. However, if all of the above was not enough to frighten the state rights fighters, then the fact that this Supreme Court decision essentially stripped states the right to decide whether or not they wanted to allow or ban slavery would most likely be the cherry on top. Due to the fact that the Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional, the federal government could no longer ban slavery in certain states, therefore allowing for any state to support or ban slavery at will. The problem with this initiative was the fact that there would not be an imbalance in the house and senate due to the unequal influx of free and slave states, which means less state representation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ap history frq

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri compromise: Unable to stop the spread of slavery altogether, abolitionists at least were able to restrict its spread.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States Congress, involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territories. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri. The 1820 passage of Missouri Compromise took place during the presidency of James Monroe.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Virginia newspaper entitled The Franklin Repository stated that the American North and South were clashing with, “irreconcilable differences of principle, and bleeding from wounds within their own household” on June 13, 1860, only a year before the civil war commenced. Compromises worked to diffuse tensions early on; however as ideas like popular sovereignty came into play, compromises were no longer effective. Cultural and economic differences between the North and South continually intensified until finally reaching a climax in 1861 when the civil war started in earnest.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays