Preview

The Melian War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Melian War
Throughout the Peloponnesian war, the island of Melos had managed to remain neutral, while refusing to become a subject of Athens. However, as the war progressed, Athens closed in on the island, which responded with hostility. The Athenians the in a frank manner suitable to their bold nature, offered the Melians an ultimatum that was essentially to surrender and pay tribute to Athens, or be conquered and destroyed. Throughout the dialogue that commenced between the Melians and the Athenians, the subjects of power, justice and prudence are addressed and debated while the theories of human nature and the relationships of states come out in the conclusions of the previously mentioned subjects. Power is a prominent and key player in the discussion …show more content…
In response to the Athenians, they say, “Here again, since you have driven us away from a plea for justice and are telling us to surrender to whatever is in your interest, we must show you what would be good for us, and try to persuade you that your interests coincide with ours” [98]. In an effort to act and care for the future, the Melians persistently try to convince the Athenians that they are acting in a manner that is best for the self-interest of Athens. However, the results come down to the Melians having to concede or fight. They instead put their trust in assistance from chance, the gods and he Spartans… all of which let them …show more content…
They demonstrate courage and a love for their country, and simply do not wish to lose their freedom. In spite of the fact that they are militarily weaker than the Athenians, they are prepared to defend themselves. The majority of their appeals to the Athenians are based on the concept of justice, with which they associate with fairness, thus regarding the Athenians as “unjust.” They put their faith in the Gods that they believe will support their cause and compensate for their weakness, and trust that their allies, the Spartans, will help them. Hence, it can be deduced that the elements of the speech of the Melians are those of the idealistic or liberal world views: the belief that nations have the right to exercise political independence, that they have mutual obligations to one another and will carry out such obligations, and that a war of aggression is unjust. Nevertheless, in the end, no matter the amounts of hope, the Melians lack the resources and foresight to defend themselves. As the Athenians forewarned, “People who put everything they have at risk will learn what hope is when it fails them, for hope is prodigal by nature; and once they have learned this, it is too late to take precautions for the future”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pericles, being the man of approved “wisdom and eminent reputation,” was chosen by the state to administer an appropriate eulogy. He begins his Oration by commending all those who contributed their lives to defending the Athenian Empire. Quickly after his appraisal, Pericles transitions into glorifying the democratic institutions in which Athens was founded upon. “And if our more remote ancestors deserve praise, much more do our own fathers, who added to their inheritance the empire which we now possess, and spared no to be able to leave their acquisitions to us of the present generation.” (2.36, PG. 112) Pericles continues by describing how democracy not only exhibits freedom in government, but also in ordinary life, which in turn allowed the public to pursue means of…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta's Decline

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After a long endeavor, Sparta arose victorious. Having crushed its rival Athens, Sparta took hegemonic control over most of the other Greek city-states. Rather than rule as an empire, Sparta chose to “exercise considerable influence over the domestic and foreign decisions of these independent states” (Hooker). The other city-states hated this as Sparta tended to uproot a lot of what the other cities had worked so diligently to build. In the case of Athens, Sparta “pulled down the democratic government and established an oligarchy” (Hooker). Not only were they sulking in the shame of their defeat, but they were subjected to what they would have considered a backwards and insulting form of government. Richard Hooker, in his article “The Spartan Hegemony,” says that this oligarchy ruled “with an iron fist, often ordering summary executions of political opponents,” and the local Athenians ended up dubbing them “the thirty tyrants.” This is the most extreme example of their broad mistreatment, but their hegemonic influence caused many of the other city-states to greatly resent them. Inarguably, Sparta’s controversial foreign policy decisions cost them many key allies and made them many…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides, a known historian during the time, described and analyzed the motives of the infamous Peloponnesian War. The war was between two powerful city-states: Athens and Sparta. The conflict arose due to excessive power. The Athenians were optimistic that they were the driving force that led Greece and all of its city-states. Specifically, the historian focuses on the funeral oration presented by Pericles. Pericles, ironically, doesn’t display sorrow but displays comfort and proud of what each individual has contributed to Athens. For Pericles, it wasn’t about the tragic fatalities but about courage and patriotism. Pericles believes in Athens and knows that this city-state possesses many freedoms and opportunities for success and peace.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "I doubt seriously whether a man can think with full wisdom and deep convictions regarding certain of the basic international issues today who has not at least reviewed in his mind the period of the Peloponnesian War and the Fall of Athens." George C. Marshall. The Peloponnesian War that took place from 431 B.C. to 404 B.C., as George C. Marshall said, is one of the most important wars in the last 2,500 years of history. The war changed the expansion of democracy for the rest of history and forced the remaining Greek states to adapt a form of Oligarchy government instead of Democracy. At the end of the Peloponnesian War, Sparta's army defeated the Athenian navy due to it using its overwhelming strengths and overcoming its weaknesses. Sparta…

    • 2301 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ammon's War

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    Athea used to be part of Egypt until in an unknown year when an unknown disaster broke off part of Egypt where the ruler at the time was loosing power. The citizens there were unharmed, but shocked and didn't know what to do. Then a man name Ammon brought them all together and told them what to do. When the ruler of Egypt heard that part of his country broke off and are ruling themselves he was frustrated so he declared war to get it back. Ammon was appointed General and all able bodied men to fight. The war lasted 10 years when Egypt lost, everyone was in shock, but the ruler of Egypt didn't have enough money to support the soldiers. The General became king and ruled the country with love and care. After the war so many flowers and weeds…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens and Sparta were two Greek poleis that coexisted between 750-c. 500 B.C.E. (Duiker 119). Even though these two city-states were similar in a few ways, they were different in many more ways, so they didn’t particularly get along very well. Almost every aspect of their lives was different, from their government systems, to their views on men and women, and finally to their lasting effects on Greek history and culture. Despite their differences, they both influenced Greece and the Mediterranean areas.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They also fell noticeably short of their own military ambitions and perceptions. They boasted that they were more than strong enough to hold their own and that their “diplomacy” of promising freedom for those who submitted to their rule could win over any hostile outsiders. Yet, in their attempted “negotiations” with the Melians, the Athenians essentially admitted they could not accept neutrality because they were afraid of looking weak in the eyes of their subjects. In a sense, the Athenians admitted their shortcomings right to their enemies’ faces. A stable empire with a truly strong military would not possess such a fear, at least not to the extent that its policies would revolve around that fear. Furthermore, the Melians pointed out that the Athenians’ rationale and strategy were fairly absurd: they should instead allow the Melians and others to remain neutral. By being aggressive conquerors, the Athenians will only create more bitterness, anger, and resentment among their subjects, and thus invite more hostility from their subjects and outsiders. The Athenians, letting their pride come first, rejected this argument and refused to consider the possibility of a friendly yet neutral…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whenever there is an argument or war there is always differences between both parties involved. In order to understand the causes of the Peloponnesian War, we must look at their differences. One of the main differences that the Athenians and the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is due to them, that the struggles of war have commenced. Recently we have dispatched envoys to the island of Melos with the supposed intentions of negotiations. These citizens of Athenian convictions have reported to us the intentions of the Melians. I quote the segment of their speech that detailed their reasoning of the negotiations with the Melians concerning power “of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An account of the Athenian Mitylenian Debate from Thuycidides’s History of the Peloponessian War illustrates how the democratic process impedes decision-making in…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Machiavelli and Odysseus

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages

    This text contains a thorough history of ancient Greek political thought. It examines different kinds of ancient text (e.g. The Odyssey) in order to clearly demonstrate the political thought and structure of ancient Greece during its time. It also studies the connection between politics and ethics in ancient Greece. Part of this text studies the tendencies of the noblemen to revolt against a ruler. Balot stated that the aristocrats often sought for political connection outside a king’s monarchy to gain additional political connection that could possibly help them attack their own government. It also contains Balot’s view of the situation in Ithaca when Odysseus power is inexistent. Balot stated that Odysseus existence as a king is the only thing that hinders the “less-restrained” aristocrats from doing what they wish to do in his land.…

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trojan War

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most wars take years and years to get into full motion that is why the Trojan War is so different from all the other wars. On January 1st is when the wedding took place, the 2nd Paris place judgement, the 3rd Paris went to visit the king of Sparta and while he is there he steal Helen and by the 5th of January the king of Sparta realizes that his wife is missing so he starts to search for her. When he found out on the 6th he had a army put together the next day. On January 7th Greeks declared war on the Trojans. Ships set sail and they begin their first fight against the two countries on the 10th. It had all happened in less than a week for both sides to have army's ready and have enough supplies and warfare to last them through the war. Since…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Trojan War

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    married to Kin Menelaus of Sparta but when visited by Paris, she fled with Paris…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the conquest of neighbouring Messenia in 640BC, and the enslavement of the entire population, the Spartans found themselves outnumbered 10 to 1 by a hostile population. As a result, they developed a society revolving around the military as a necessity to keep these helots under control. Although widely held, this view is disputed by P. Cartledge who points to the emergence of hoplite warfare as [“the cause”? of] this social and political change. Nevertheless, the freedom from labour allowed the Spartans to pursue this way of life.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays