Preview

The Law Relating to Companies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Law Relating to Companies
City University of Hong Kong School of Law LW3902 The Law Relating to Companies Mid-Semester Coursework Assignment Semester B, 2010/2011 Instructions to Students:
1. The assignment is worth 50% of the overall mark for this course. The total word limit is 2,000 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography. You must do a word count and indicate the number of words on the cover page. If a paper exceeds the allowable word limit, only the first 2,000 words will be read and marked. You must type the answers in a 1.5 lines spacing format printed on just one side of a standard A4-size white paper. The font size of the characters should be “Times New Roman” and “12 point”. You must write down the course code and title, your name, student number, seminar section, cohort and tutor’s name on the cover page of your assignment. You must upload a soft copy of your individual assignment onto the Blackboard and drop a hard copy of it into a designated collection box in front of the General Office of the School of Law located on 5/F Purple Zone of Academic Building, from 21st March 2011 (Mon) to 23rd March 2011 (Wed). You must strictly adhere to the policy of City University of Hong Kong on plagiarism, which is a serious academic offence. Suspected plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action. You may discuss your work with others, but you must provide your own answers. In case of doubt as to what amounts to plagiarism, please consult your lecturer. Any sources for your answers should be footnoted in the paper. You should cite authority (i.e. cases and/or statutes) to support your legal arguments, but again these sources should be noted. Example of proper format of citation: Case: Book: Liu Hon Ying v Hua Xin State Enterprise (HK) Ltd [2003] 3 HKLRD 347 Srivastava, D.K. (2007), Business Law in Hong Kong (2nd ed), Sweet & Maxwell, Hong Kong, pp.478-479 Statue: s.275(1) of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) 8. Extension to the deadline for submitting the assignment may be granted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue: the issue about company’s constitution and whether the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Pamela Hanrahan, Lan Ramsay, Geoff Stapledon,(2013), Commercial Application Of Company Law,14th Edition, Publisher McPherson’s Printing Group.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Consider comparative advantages and disadvantages of each form of association in the light of facts given.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bisacre, J. R. and McFadzean, C. (2011) Company law, Law essentials, Dundee: Dundee University Press.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Lipton P., Herzberg A., 2006. Understanding Company Law. 13th ed. Sydney: Thomson Lawbook Co.…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 2 ]. Commercial Applications of Company Law, CCH Publishers Australia, 2012, 13th Edition, Pamela Hanrahan, Ian Ramsay, Geof Stapledon…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Students’ Answers in this document are for the questions in the below textbook (which can be borrowed in Beanland Library):…

    • 41100 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The information revolution and the advances in technology during the past decades has brought to fore many challenges and issues to both governments and businesses, the age-old crime of espionage or the practice of spying to gather secret information is one the most potential issues facing information-based societies. Although, much has been documented as fact and fiction concerning the traditional foreign agents and spies, in today 's world of multi-national, multi-billion dollar corporations, and industrial espionage is a growing danger. Furthermore, this is aggravated by the fact that many large businesses are physically disseminated which has distributed management and administration, and more job specialization.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. There was clearly no dissolution. The agreement provided that the partnership may only be terminated “by mutual agreement”. Hence, Morrissey’s unilateral action (resignation) is insufficient to dissolve the partnership: Moss v Elphick. Section 26 of the Partnership Act (“PA”) is applicable only when the partnership was silent on the duration of the partnership. In this instance, the agreement was for the partnership to enure for the joint lives of the parties (unless terminated by mutual agreement). Section 32(1) (c) is also inapplicable since the parties had indicated that the partnership was to be determined by “mutual agreement”, hence subjecting it to a contrary intention. Thus there was no dissolution of the partnership…

    • 4353 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corporate Law Case Study

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Capital Pty Ltd is inquiring into the Commissioner of Tax’s notice disallowing the tax deduction for bad debt. The Commissioner based the argument on the premise that Capital Pty Ltd is a mere appendage of Eastfield Ltd. This being the case, it is necessary to examine the exact relationship between Capital Pty Ltd and Eastfield Ltd and determine the likelihood of the courts lifting the corporate veil.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanrahan, P., Ramsay I., Stapledon G., Commercial Applications of Company Law. CCH 11th edition 2010…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors Duty

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hanrahan, P., Ramsay, I. & Stapledon, G. 2011, Commerical Applications of Company Law, 12th ed, CCH Australia Limited, North Ryde, NSW.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Law

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic, Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Adelaide.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays