The Lamp At Noon Analysis
When a person’s perspective about the world changes, they are able to see the world through ‘new eyes’. These new eyes could allow an individual to see the world the way another person does, enlightening them with a new understanding of that individual’s life and personal experiences. In “The Lamp at Noon” by Sinclair Ross, the relationship between Paul and Ellen is strained. They are mentally isolated from each other. Paul becomes accustomed to this isolation and does not understand Ellen’s need for companionship and purpose. In order for Paul to understand Ellen’s world, he must first overcome the barriers set between them.
The wind is used to represent the characters’ conflicts; both within themselves and with each other. The wind continues …show more content…
He wishes to provide for his family on his own but does not realize, with his current perspective, that he cannot. “Paul ran his hands over the ribs, and felt a sudden shame, a sting of fear that Ellen might be right in what she said. For wasn't it true- nine years a farmer now on his own land, and still couldn't even feed his horses? What, then, could he hope to do for his wife and son?” This quote shows the moment that Paul begins to question his choices. He thinks about what his wife had to live for “She looked forward to no future. She had no faith or dream with which to make the dust and the poverty less real. He understood suddenly.” He gains a new viewpoint on life at this moment. He now understands Ellen's feelings about their living situation. “...working the soil till it was lifeless dust - but he would do better now. He would plant clover and alfalfa, breed cattle, acre by acre and year by year restore to his land its fibre and fertility.” This new worldview would allow Paul to mend his relationship with his wife and possibly consider accepting help in the future with his farm and family. “‘You were right, Paul…’ her voice came whispering, as if she too could feel the hush. ‘You said tonight we'd see the storm go down. So still now, and a red sky - it means tomorrow will be fine.’” This quote demonstrates how Ellen understands her husband’s change and is willing to work with him now. As the storm has calmed, this shows that
The wind is used to represent the characters’ conflicts; both within themselves and with each other. The wind continues …show more content…
He wishes to provide for his family on his own but does not realize, with his current perspective, that he cannot. “Paul ran his hands over the ribs, and felt a sudden shame, a sting of fear that Ellen might be right in what she said. For wasn't it true- nine years a farmer now on his own land, and still couldn't even feed his horses? What, then, could he hope to do for his wife and son?” This quote shows the moment that Paul begins to question his choices. He thinks about what his wife had to live for “She looked forward to no future. She had no faith or dream with which to make the dust and the poverty less real. He understood suddenly.” He gains a new viewpoint on life at this moment. He now understands Ellen's feelings about their living situation. “...working the soil till it was lifeless dust - but he would do better now. He would plant clover and alfalfa, breed cattle, acre by acre and year by year restore to his land its fibre and fertility.” This new worldview would allow Paul to mend his relationship with his wife and possibly consider accepting help in the future with his farm and family. “‘You were right, Paul…’ her voice came whispering, as if she too could feel the hush. ‘You said tonight we'd see the storm go down. So still now, and a red sky - it means tomorrow will be fine.’” This quote demonstrates how Ellen understands her husband’s change and is willing to work with him now. As the storm has calmed, this shows that