Preview

The Importance Of Nuclear Power In The United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Nuclear Power In The United States
Illinois has eleven nuclear power plants, which is the largest one out of thirty-one states. According to Encyclopedia of Energy, Alok Kumar, “There are one hundred and four operational nuclear power plants in the United States, providing nineteen percent of the total electricity, which amounts to approximately 100,000 mw.” Since there are a few states left that do not have power plants, maybe they could raise money and build some nuclear power plants and then that would also help the U.S. in reducing the dependency on foreign oil. The power plants, which use a nuclear fission process to produce the heat to boil the water, and then using a turbine, it produces the electricity, which can help the U.S. in helping reducing the dependence on foreign …show more content…
According to Nuclear Energy Institute web site, NEI is a policy organization of the technologies and nuclear energy industry. They participate in global policy making process and in the national. It is to make sure that the policies of formation and promote technologies and nuclear energy around the world and the United States. “Nuclear Energy generates 63% of America’s carbon-free Electricity (which is 2/3 of the power), Hydro Electric has 20%, solar, wind and thermal has 17.1% of the energy. The U.S. needs nuclear energy because it is reliable, affordable, and is clean air energy. It also has economic growth, job creation, and has value of electricity diversity. According to Economic Times, The government will be taking some major policy initiatives to help pick up hydro power generations, improve and speed up the current use of the energy-efficient LED bulbs. “They have been selling in such large volumes, that their prices have went below Rs 60, coal, powered and renewable energy” minister Plyush

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The way a reactor works is in a nuclear power plant water is turned into steam, which drives turbine generators to produce electricity. At nuclear power plants, the heat to make the steam is created when the uranium atoms split which is called fission.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Carter Oil Crisis

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    For thirty years Americans have watched as our Presidents have debated over the foreign oil dilemma. Throughout those thirty years little has been accomplished. Research has been done and we have finally gotten the hybrid car on the market, but the use of foreign oil is still a drastic measure and keeps rising each year. There are many options America could use to end this war on oil. Some of them include the use of ethanol, hybrid cars, and nuclear power plants. We do use some of these, but perhaps we need to expand their use instead of looking to the Middle East to continue to supply our needs. However, we have not taken the time, nor initiative to research some of these ideas further. For instance, ethanol as a fuel is available in some…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power is produced through the use of nuclear reactions to produce nuclear energy that can then be harnessed to generate heat and create superheated steam to drive turbines. The most common nuclear reaction is that of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom’s nucleus into smaller nuclei. Nuclear reactions are incredibly energy dense and thus allow nuclear reactors to make a tremendous amount of electricity. There are only 61 nuclear power plants in the United States, but they account for 19 percent of the entire country’s electricity production. [8][14] There are 7,304 total power plants in the United States, so nuclear plants on average produce over twenty-eight times as much energy as another plant in the U.S.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After researching and studying several types of energy and thinking about North Carolina, it seem that the best option for North Carolina is nuclear energy for many reasons. There are pros and cons for nuclear energy. However, all of the energy sourced that were researched had pros and cons. Nuclear energy is already being used successfully in North Carolina.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the solution to the United States dependency on foreign oil is not with tapping our own supplies of fossil fuel, but with our own supplies of coal. Technology developed in the 1930’s allows the production of oil from coal (Strong). Jonathan Strong advocates that “Coal is one of the most abundant fossil fuels in the world and can be mined relatively easily. Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Montana have huge reserves of coal (Strong).” Strong states that Governor Brian Schweitzer of Montana believes that his state “could produce oil and other petroleum products from the millions of tons of coal reserves it owns in southeast Montana (Strong).” The cost to produce a barrel of oil via coal liquefaction is…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Energy Policy

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages

    Nuclear energy issues facing Congress include federal incentives for new commercial reactors, radioactive waste management policy, research and development priorities, power plant safety and regulation, nuclear weapons proliferation, and security against terrorist attacks. Significant incentives for new commercial reactors were included in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58). These include production tax credits, loan guarantees, insurance against regulatory delays, and extension of the Price-Anderson Act nuclear liability system. Together with higher fossil fuel prices and the possibility of greenhouse gas controls, the federal incentives for nuclear power have helped spur renewed interest by utilities and other potential reactor developers. Plans for as many as 31 reactor license applications have been announced, although it is unclear how many of those projects will move forward. In his January 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama called for “building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants” as a key component of his “clean energy” program. Financing for new reactors is widely considered to depend on the loan guarantees authorized by EPACT05 Title XVII, administered by the Department of Energy (DOE). The total amount of loan guarantees to be provided to nuclear power projects has been a continuing congressional issue. Nuclear power plants are currently allocated $18.5 billion in loan guarantees, enough for three or four reactors. President Obama’s FY2011 budget request would nearly triple the loan guarantee ceiling for nuclear power plants, to $54.5 billion. However, opponents of nuclear power contend that the Administration’s proposed increases in nuclear loan guarantees…

    • 16160 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As opposed to an either/or approach, use your thesis statement (place it as the last sentence of the introduction) to clearly select either nuclear or coal and then use the arguments in your paper to support that position.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the severity of the global warming threat attains universal recognition, the United States must look for ways to decrease its reliance on fossil fuels for electricity production. The combustion of fossil fuels such as oil and coal to generate electricity produces carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that lead to a variety of environmental problems. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a comparatively clean source of energy. Though still widely employed, concerns over security of stored waste and a public distrust of reactor safety—fueled by the incidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986, and the paranoia behind the sensational but popular film The China Syndrome—have led to calls for the decommissioning of older plants in current operation. However, it makes little sense, economically and in terms of energy capacity, to decommission plants currently in operation. Conversely, the environmental superiority of renewable sources of energy, the problem of storage of nuclear-waste, nuclear energy’s risks and dangers, and the high expense of nuclear power due to high construction costs and enormous funding for incremental research make the construction of new nuclear power plants an impractical means of decreasing the United States’ reliance on fossil fuels for electricity.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I belive that we should own nuclear wepons. Hoever, I also belive that we shouldn't keep wasing millions of trillions of dollars on them. Our country is very loved, but aslo very hated. With these weapons we can keep us safer and also we can help keep allies safer with advanced weapons. With the amount of nuclear weapons we do have we could blow up the world. It would only take roughly around 200 of these bombs to destroy the largest county in the wrold which is Russia. With the creation of the nukes comes the threat of using them. Only two nuclear weapons have actully been used, both being by the United States during WWII on the Japanesse. After we dropped these bombs we sent shockwaves through the counties, and a new trend of havin nuclear weapns began. Shotly aftermany counties began designing, and making bombs.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there is no doubting that solar and wind will create jobs and bring in its own income, ultimately nuclear power will be more beneficial for the United States. In order to bring wind generated energy production up the tax payer will pay a heavy price, to raise the wind energy production level from just 1.5% to 4% over the next ten years it will cost at least $29 billion in federal subsidies (Alexander). Nuclear power is better suited for the economy as it is a cheaply produced source of energy, yet the United States is not capitalizing on it. This lack of nuclear energy investment on the United States is resulting in other countries to capture the benefits of this cheap energy source; China, Russia and Japan are all cashing in on nuclear power for its cheap energy. The benefit of cheap energy is that energy intensive industries have an incentive to set up sites using nuclear energy for the lessened power bill they have to pay. If other countries continue to produce cheap energy American industries may want to consider moving to these countries with lower energy costs. If businesses move over seas the United States losses jobs to other countries and we are no better…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global warming is a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere, creating the greenhouse effect, caused by the increased of Carbon dioxide, Chlorofluorocarbons, and pollutants that was made by us humans. For centuries, the argument of Global warming has been about it being a myth or a fact, but scientist today has proved the existent of Global warming and there is no way to stop it. The one and only thing we human can do is to slow Global warming down. Many argues that Nuclear Power is a near perfect substituted in the place of burning fossil fuels because Nuclear Power does not create nearly as much Carbon dioxide, while others argues that the government have no actual plan for Nuclear Power Plant, and even if they did, the Nuclear Power Plant would be a massive target for terrorist attack. As the argument rages on, one might think that ‘Is Nuclear Power really the solution to Global Warming, or the actual solution is completely something else’.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many methods of power production are used throughout the power industry. One form of power production is nuclear power. The construction of a nuclear power plant would provide jobs in the Port Augusta community, this method of power production is also a reliable source of energy. However, there are disadvantages of having a nuclear power plant such as the environmental impacts it may cause and the threat of a nuclear accident. This essay will depict if a nuclear power plant should or should not be constructed in Port Augusta.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays