Preview

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Assignment One
Assignment One
LAW 107 – TRIBUNAL LAW
LAW 107 – TRIBUNAL LAW
ANSWERS:
1. The enabling statute for the Immigration and Refugee Board is the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

2. The Ontario Statutory Powers Procedure Act (SPPA) does not apply to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

3. The Immigration and Refugee Board is subject to a right to statutory appeal as per section 62 and section 63(1)…..63(5) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

4. The procedural steps or facts about the determination of inadmissibility as per the Immigration and Refugee Board is as follows:
Inadmissibility
Rules of interpretation
33. The facts that constitute inadmissibility under sections 34 to 37 include facts arising from omissions and, unless otherwise provided, include facts for which there are reasonable grounds to believe that they have occurred, are occurring or may occur.
Security
* 34. (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for * (a) engaging in an act of espionage or an act of subversion against a democratic government, institution or process as they are understood in Canada; * (b) engaging in or instigating the subversion by force of any government; * (c) engaging in terrorism; * (d) being a danger to the security of Canada; * (e) engaging in acts of violence that would or might endanger the lives or safety of persons in Canada; or * (f) being a member of an organization that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c). * Exception
(2) The matters referred to in subsection (1) do not constitute inadmissibility in respect of a permanent resident or a foreign national who satisfies the Minister that their presence in Canada would not be detrimental to the national interest.
Human or international rights violations * 35. (1) A permanent resident or a foreign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kanthasamy Case Summary

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page

    This case is on appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal, where the decision to dismiss had been unanimous. The appellant Jekayannan Kanthasamy is hence, appealing the decision dismissing his application for judicial review of the denial of his request for humanitarian and compassionate relief under s.25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The respondant in this case is the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. This appeal was supported by intervenors including the Canadian Council for Refugees, Justice for Children and Youth, Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic, Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture, Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers and Parkdale Community Legal Services.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada, after a failed appeal in the Court of Appeal, issues concerning whether the non-universal proclamation of S. 234.1 of the Criminal Code infringed on the right to equality before the law, as outlined in S. 1 (b) of the Bill of Rights, the second issue raised in the lower courts was whether the random stopping of cars by police officers infringed on the right not to be arbitrarily detained described by S. 9 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and another major issue raised in the lower courts was whether Mr. Hufsky’s rights were infringed upon…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jane Mcadam Summary

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reform use information gained from the High Court decision in the case Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar (2002) 210 CLR 1. The reforms mainly focus on the reforming of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) where the ALRC recommends that the Minster for Immigration and Citizenship should issue direction in relation to family violence in refugee assessment determination. The report is useful to my research topic, as ALRC identifies issues in the assessment of refugees as well as provides recommendations for reforms in order to protect the human rights of the vulnerable group. Main limitation of this report is that it primarily focuses on the family violence issues suffered by refugees but does not expand to any other problems suffered by refugee. Despite this, the report still suggests recommendations that are intended support the victims of family violence under the Refugee Convention. This article will be included in suggesting and influencing other reforms put out in my essay in order to enhance protection of human rights of the vulnerable…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Read each step carefully. Incomplete appeals, including those submitted without completing steps 1-4 or without supporting documentation, WILL BE DENIED.…

    • 768 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is the deliberate and planned breach of policy or law by an individual or group of people.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    With conflict around the world rising exponentially, more and more people are fleeing torture and persecution, sacrificing their identity, in the hope of living a new and safe life in Australia. The Migration Act 1958 requires people who are not citizens and are unlawfully in Australia to be detained. This legislation ensures that asylum seekers arriving in Australia can be detained for unspecific and prolonged periods of time. No one wants to be a refugee: they just want to live a normal life like everyone else but they are powerless to change the situation in their country, to change their circumstances.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treatment of refugees is a contemporary human rights issue that has caused a lot of debate within Australia’s government. There are legal and non-legal domestic and international responses to the issue on the treatment of refugees. The legal domestic and international responses…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Canadians have long valued their traditions of democracy, freedom and tolerance. The rights and values so important to all Canadians are enshrined in The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, The Bill of Rights and provincial human rights codes. Along with these rights come certain responsibilities, such as respecting the rights and…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the events on September 11th all immigration policy and enforcement was handled by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) under the Department of Justice. However once the Department of Homeland Security was created, the INS was absorbed and broken down into seperate offices. Two of these offices include the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Immigration and Customs enforcement…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Baker V. Canada

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Baker, moving the case further, the supreme court of Canada reversed the decision, it stated that procedural fairness expected the immigration officer to consider the human rights of the appellant children in decision making.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There have been numerous legal responses to asylum seekers in Australia, all of which have been ineffective in achieving fair outcomes for both Australian citizens and refugees seeking asylum in Australia. The basis for all legislation regarding refugees in Australia is the Migration Act 1958, which outlines powers such as being able to cap the number of refugees accepted into Australia each year, and defines a refugee as somebody “being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion”, which is written according to the United Nation’s definition.12 Since then a number of amendments and additions have been made to this act, including the Migration Amendment Act 1992, Pacific Solution, Migration Amendment (Abolishing Detention Debt) Act 2009 and the Regional Resettlement Arrangement (RRA) Australia and Papua New Guinea. All of these legal responses to the issue of asylum seekers in Australia have proven ineffective as they fail to achieve fair outcomes for either those seeking asylum in Australia or the present citizens of Australia.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule is an extremely important subject that has been highly debated with regard to criminal law and the constitution. Supporters of the Rule believe that it is necessary to ensure that the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, does not protect alone in the Bill of Rights. A controversial topic, having opponents of the Rule,…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 19, 2000 Lazaro Gonzalez, plaintiff filed this lawsuit, alleging that the INS lacked the authority to reject the asylum applications and was required by federal statutes and regulations to accept and adjudicate those applications. Defendants urge this Court to dismiss the action or, alternatively, to grant summary judgment. Defendants attack the Complaint on various grounds, each of which is addressed below. Having carefully studied this matter, and mindful of the limits on this Court's authority, the Court concludes that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss or Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment must be granted.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, the cases before Refugee Appeals Board, the composition and organization of the Board can lead to conclusion that the proceedings are narrowly focused on domestic legislation. It appears that the decision making procedure has a little transparency and much political focus on its activities. This means, that this administrative body seems to be less favorable to internationalization. It needs to be taken into account that Denmark has strong traditions of dualism regarding the sources of law and the legal reasoning in the courts…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays