Preview

The High Cost of High-Tech Foods

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The High Cost of High-Tech Foods
The High Cost of High-Tech Foods 1) What are the ethical issues in this case?
I think the main ethical issue in this case is the fact that food not approved for human consumption was allowed to be given to humans. Before humans are allowed to be given these foods, long term studies should be conducted. 2) Do you think either group, pro-GM or anti-GM foods, is correct while the other group is wrong? If so, what reasoning do you give for supporting the position of one group over the other? Is it possible for both to be right? What ethical concepts help you decide?
I believe both are right to some extent. I think that once approved for human consumption the upside of GM foods will be tremendous. GM foods can feed way more people per acre than organic food. Bugs and animals will eat less, leaving more for human consumption. GM foods are able to be grown in areas that other foods do not grow as well. The overall cost of food will go down, as are ability to feed a growing human population will go up. However, I do see a point to the anti-GM side for now. Not enough is known about possible effects of the food. If we started to introduce this food now, in five years half the human population could have cancer or some other side effect of these foods. After sufficient testing, I think GM foods are in the future for the world. 3) Is there any way to bridge the gap between these groups? If so, what would the advantages and disadvantages be?
I don’t believe there is any way to bridge the gap between these groups. Even if approved by the FDA for human consumption, environmentalist and other groups will still worry about things like cross breeding into organic plants and possible effects to the food chain. There would be great advantages if they were to work together, possibly developing a way to make everyone happy. Maybe they can alter the plant to produce more, but not produce natural pesticides or introduce certain genes from other types

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    However, if there is no intervention to try to stop the businesses from using GMOs from the government or for the community that are having this enormous problem, then the businesses do not have any motives to stop using it. Therefore, the author is trying to make this point stand out in the article. The author also recognizes other complications in which that the Organic Consumers Association states that, “Calves are born too weak to walk, with enlarged joints and limb deformities. Piglets experience rapidly deteriorating health, a ‘failure to thrive’ so severe that they start breaking down their own tissues and organs self-cannibalizing—to survive.” This is a logos statement which emphasizes on the author’s opinion on the persuasion of the search for the truth which is conversation. This with no hesitation apprehend the reader’s attention as it suggests that businesses only wanted to make a profit and how they can invest money, but how they do not care what the end result of their products is and what the long-term consequence of their product may have on individuals…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Food Inc.

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe people have every right to know what is in their food because of all the deaths that have happened. I think that companies do not want us to know what is in our food due to how cruel they treat their animals. Cheap preservatives like corn are being excessively added to our foods. People also have every right to know what is in their food due to contamination. In the film, a mother lost her little boy from e.coli contracted from eating a hamburger. This resulted from the cows being fed cheap filler food. The film also shows meat packers using ammonia to cleanse meat meant for human consumption.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the current arguments for the people for GM foods are that people shouldn't be worried until their research finds danger and we should continue to feed the hungry world. With this technology, we can multiply acre yields and at the same time reduce the need for herbicides and pesticides. The people against GM food argue that we are moving to fast by not researching the effects long enough. The science based arguments contradict both parties. Governments citing GM company studies say GM crops and non-GM crops are so similar the do not pose a threat to consumers. Interest groups disagree because they claim the studies are flawed.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first ethical issue I perceive in the case is that both parties, when discussing the subject, base their arguments more on feelings and assumptions than on scientific facts, which I find unethical when discussing something as important as health and alimentation. Also, there is the pro-GM vision, that claims that the “risks should be judged once scientific consensus has been reached.” I think that this argument in not ethical, since the fact that scientific groups haven’t completely agreed on the side effects of GM foods doesn’t mean that these risks are not present. On the other side, I also see that the argument of anti-GM foods to be vague, since deliberately slowing down research and progress “in order that society may digest innovations of past years” means to stop human development without a reason, which I find unethical. Another ethical issue present is the claim of anti-GM foods groups of the studies of GM-crops being biased and reaching conclusions without sufficient evidence. Also, it is very likely that companies producing pesticides and herbicide-resistant seeds exaggerate the benefits of their products while diminishing or hiding the side effects, in order to make more sales. Finally, according to GM proponents, “detractors often exaggerate environmental hazards, do not substantiate their claims with scientific evidence, and are simply reacting out of fear”, which is an unethical reaction to a field that might end world hunger.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One side, discussing about these GMOs is a progress for our humanity and our technology. The other side stating that these are unsafe and can cause harm to human health and to our environment.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Effects of Gmos

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two articles I have chosen are both peer-reviewed and have two different opinions about GMO’s. The first article, titled “GMO’s and Global Justice” by Kristian Toft, is against the use of GMO’s, explaining how they are bad for us as human beings and for our environment. Her biggest concern is that we do not know the extent of what these genetically modified foods are doing to our bodies because of the lack of long-term affect testing. When trans-fats were first introduced, corporations battled to get them onto our grocery shelves. It is only decades later that this once novel food has been proven to be extremely unhealthful. This could be a glance into the future of GMO’s. It is similarly a concern that GMO’s in food are causing an increase in allergic reactions. The process of genetically modifying a plant or animal adds new proteins that weren’t indigenous to the original plant or animal, causing an allergic reaction increase when ingested in the human body. Also, some GMO foods have had antibiotic features added to them so they are resistant to certain diseases and viruses. When humans eat them, these antibiotics features persist in our bodies and make actual antibiotic medications less effective. Toft goes on to say that GMO’s are banned in more than 60 countries around the world including, the European Union,…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GMO crops face a lot of criticism, but the facts are that they are more environmentally friendly than traditional crops, they have higher and more stable yields than traditional crops, and are safe to consume. Some critics claim that GMO crops are unsafe and offer no significant advantages over traditional ones. This however, is not true. GMO crops are as safe as and more effective than traditional crops in every way.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    GMO-Green Revolution

    • 2121 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Global commercialization of GM foods have been on increase with crops being produced on 282.4 million acres between 1994 and 2007 (Batisa, R and Oliveira M, M 2009). Despite this sustained growth of GM crops there have been concerns and controversies surrounding the use and consumption of GM foods and more fundamentally the social issue of acceptance of GM foods by people.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 2: It is hard to say whether one group is right and one is wrong in this debate. The two sides both have strong arguments and have valid reasoning behind their beliefs. As stated above, the pro-GM groups argue that the food can be grown in large quantities to supply the hungry with food. The anti-GM groups argue that we do not need to rush to disperse experimental foods without more research and testing. Even though the government states that GM crops are similar to non-GM crops and show no risk to the consumer, environmentalist groups think these conclusions are incorrect and there is not enough evidence to support these statements.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mega Foods Case Study

    • 1887 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the regional director for Mega Foods Inc., I foresee several ethical issues stemming from closing plant operations in Orchard, Georgia and moving operations to the country of Frostburg. The utilitarianism approach as mentioned in Northouse (2013) is behaving in a way as to create the greatest the good for the greatest number. Keeping operations in Orchard, Georgia may not be the most profitable option; however it allows the local economy to thrive by keeping operations local. Farmers are able to sustain as well as the local economy due to consumers having disposable income. From an economic standpoint consumers are able to afford normal goods. If production is moved families will be forced to cut expenses down to bare necessities. If production is moved Mega Foods is creating the greatest good for herself or himself as defined in Northouse (2013) as ethical egoism. Ethical egoism is common in some business contexts in which a company and its employees make decisions to achieve its goal of maximizing profits (Northouse, 2013).…

    • 1887 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapping out the interests of various groups will identify where tensions may arise. They need an open dialogue, to facilitate an open-minded discourse, on the issues most important to their cases. This will lead to a more thorough look at interests and bring out hidden interests, with less likelihood of conflict arising and halting the process.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking at the issue of labeling with a Kantian or Rawlsian perspective may bring about the best way to solve the issue. Kant’s theory discusses using humanity as an end as opposed to a means to an end. Opponents and proponents of GMO’s would agree to labeling if it were a discreet yet clear labeling and if it weren't used as a scare tactic to alarm consumers. We believe that everyone would agree to this. Through the Rawlsian perspective, this type of discreet yet clear labeling would reach an end that was mutually accepted by both GMO producers and consumers. This…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are two groups that shares different views about genetically modified food. One of the groups is the proponents of genetically modified food. This group believes that genetically modified food is not harmful and thinks that it helps to feed the hungry world. On the opposite are the anti-GM foods. Basically, this group deem GM food as a hazard and harmful to humankind and environment.…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Genetically Modified Foods

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Genetically modified foods have never been proven to be harmful to humans. “Genetically modified (GM) food has become so common in the U.S. that most people do not even know when they are consuming it” (“Update: Genetically Modified Food”, 2008). If the foods were harmful, people would be getting sick all the time since most of the time we don’t even know that we are consuming it. “The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared that GM foods were not ‘inherently dangerous’” (ProQuest Staff, “At Issue: Genetically Modified Foods”, 2013). The FDA is a huge association that regulates the purity and safety of foods, drugs, and cosmetics. If they say that the GM foods are safe, then they are definitely safe.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I was born and raised in a small rural town in western Kansas. I have learned hardworking values growing up on a farm. My family relies on farming and ranching as a way of life. So, when I hear people talking about how GMO’s are bad for people’s health and our environment, it makes me feel concerned about the information people are receiving. GMO’s don’t affect the health of people or the environment at all. Instead they help to improve crop yields by modifying the seeds according to where a person lives by being drought resistant or bug resistant for example. This helps farmers and ranchers such as my family to make more profit from a higher yield. This results in more food produced which can help in a world with an ever-growing population.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays