Preview

The Happenings Outside of Europe Africa and Atlantic World

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Happenings Outside of Europe Africa and Atlantic World
The Happenings outside of Europe
Africa and Atlantic World
The African leaders responded to European traders by working together with European colonialists firstly because they thought this would protect their freedom. They did not think the Europeans would deceive them and take away their freedom when they signed the treaty. The Africans thought the Europeans wanted to protect them from others or to help trade between their countries and Europe. The African leaders were uneducated and treaties were read by missionaries and traders who talk them into signing. Many Africans join forces because of services weakness. They recognized that Europeans had better weapons for fighting. They were fearful that fighting the Europeans would put their freedom at risk. Several had seen the outcome of other people that resisted. Some Africans teamed up because they wanted to become rich. They like Europeans goods because they seem better. I ask myself, what chance did the Africans have when trying to keep their independence? I came up with they did not stand a chance. I feel that many Africans had no choice on what they wanted to do. They were uneducated and the traders took advantage of that. Many believed that by joining the Europeans they would live the lavish life, while others believe that if they join there would be some kind of protection. The Europeans manipulated the Africans and everything they stood for. The Africans really believed that the Europeans were for them and the one’s that second guess the situations were really scared to say no. They took their illiteracy and control the entire mission.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Instead of completely giving up, the Africans would fight back in war even though they were killed every time (Doc 4). An African was lucky if he had an old rusty gun, but they were going against rifles and machine guns. Samuel Maherero, a leader of the Herero people sends a motivational letter to another African leader. In the letter he tells the other African leader “not to hold aloof from the uprising, but to make his voice heard so that all of Africa may take up arms against the Germans” (Doc 7). He wants to see his people fight for themselves and die fighting for them. *** During the Maji Maji Rebellion in German East Africa, the chiefs gave magic medicine to a medicine man. This “medicine would give invulnerability, acting in such a way that enemy bullets would fall from their targets like raindrops from a greased body” (Doc 8). Africans were still fearful but on some accounts did try to better their…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Berlin conference in 1884, imperialism was introduced. European countries conquered areas of Africa, and then took advantage of its people and land. All but two countries were colonized. The colonized countries of Africa each reacted differently to European actions during the scramble for Africa. African countries began to counter-claim these threats with violent, non-violent, and diplomatic tactics.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ethiopian painting of the Battle of Adowa in 1896 where Ethiopians were victorious over Italian troops is also not clear on why the Ethiopians fought back (doc.5). Another document on why the Ethiopians fought back so vigorously would be more helpful. In a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed on the Congo River in 1877, Mojimba, an Africna chief, describes how the British had overcame Africans with guns n a lette On the other r written from an African leader to another African leader, he describes how German invaders killed one of his men everyday and it is obvious that change ropean intruders as a much stronger force than themselves and lost all their ties to older tradition through fear. In 1886, the British government commissioned and administered the development of the which was signed by many African rulers (doc.1). These Africans gave in but the document does not specify if they gave in because they lost sights of the nation they were once before. Another document of the reason why these Africans gave in would reveal if they saw the European threat as a to their…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the Berlin Conference in Europe, the scramble for African land ended up colonizing inhabited areas in Africa, destroying native nations and their traditional culture. During this time, African natives had many different reactions. Some wanted to cooperate peacefully, others wanted to withstand European pressure, but most of all, most Africans wanted to react violently and rebel against the Europeans.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scramble Dbq Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1884, the European government colonized areas in Africa which was known as the European Scramble for Africa. There are various ways of actions and reactions of the Africans in response to the European Scramble for Africa. Some are Peaceful Cooperation, some are violent, some are based on increased religion, and some are total rejection. These reactions are shown in Documents one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine. Each document has a person’s point of view and a date (1800’s-1907).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Berlin Conference from 1884-1885 the European powers divided up the continent of Africa in order to avoid wars amongst the European powers. However, not a single African leader was invited to the Berlin Conference. The leaders of the native African kingdoms reacted to European imperialism by clearly expressing their opposition to the European officials, highlighting how strange and hypocritical European culture was, and implementing any means available to fight the Europeans.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why africans? Well according to document B the english had made a settlement on Africa forty years before the trading so they knew what type of people they were dealing with. “English observers in west Africa in west Africa were sometimes so profoundly…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We can see in Document 1; the contract from the Royal Niger Company, that the Europeans wanted to make it seem as if they were giving the African Leaders a choice to give up their land. Leaders of these tribes would have believed that signing wasn’t an obligation and could refuse if they wanted. This shown in Document 2; The letter to Britain from the Ashanti leader, Prempeh I, where he states,” My kingdom of Ashanti will never commit itself to any such policy”. He declined in a respectful honorable manner, expecting the Europeans to leave them be. From Prempeh I’s point of view, he most likely believed that they were in charge of their own fate, but Europe did not just step back. An additional document that would support this would be from an African leader who signed the document, to see how they were treated in comparison to those who refused to…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes it was how the Europeans presented their colonization. In document one Europeans offered money to Africans for lands. This document, a drafted contract, showed that at least some were willing to cooperate with Europeans (Doc 1). Another African kingdom, Ethiopia, embraced European settlement because they shared religion in common. One of the only christian states in Africa, Ethiopia proposed their cooperation in European colonization if Europeans would grant them seaports (Doc 3). They felt confident enough to ask for land because they thought they were more similar to Europeans than other Africans in some aspects, like religion, which they hoped would overlook their race and skin tone. It would be informational to see a document accounting the reactions of previously aligned African countries if one of them sided with Europeans and the other did not. It could possible show if there was a feeling of betrayal amongst Africans as a whole, instead other the Africans vs Europeans view that is expressed through most of the documents. As shown, it was possible for Africans to react positively to European settlement but overall the reaction and actions were against…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary reason European countries were imperialistic in Africa were for economic reasons. Countries such as Germany, Great Britain, and France imported resources from Africa that they could not produce in their home countries. Large countries, such as Great Britain, had many colonies that they imported…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Berlin Conference all the participants signed a notion that said they could not have colonies unless they have full control of the territory they encompassed. The European powers had to send expeditionary forces to pacify what were called their African “spheres of influence.” This process was bloody and ugly due to the amount of Africans fighting back. These pacifications lasted all the way up to World War 1. These uprisings caused anarchy in some places in Africa. Only Ethiopia successfully kept their freedom militarily. But all across Africa, hundreds of polities large, and small fought to destroy these superimposed boundaries.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During that centennial, they were guilty for the conveyance of at least 2-3 million African slaves. The bulk of the slaves captured for the transatlantic slave trade were from the west coast of Africa. The trade revolved around the exchanges between the African sellars and the European buyers of the captives. Regarding the trade, it would have been impossible without African involvement. The Europeans would not have been able to venture into Africa and procure African captives without the Africans themselves.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 19th and early 20th centuries European imperialism caused its countries to divide up the rest of the world, each country claiming bits as its own. Due to its large amounts of resources, Africa was one of the main areas European nations invaded in the cause if imperialism. In Africa, there were positive and negative effects towards the Africans and the invaders. Some positive effects on Africans were that they were provided with security by their rulers and new technology was introduced to them. Some of the negative effects were that the Africans lost their natural rights such as freedom, the beginning of slavery, and the loss of their land and natural resources to the ruthless colonizers. Some positive effects on Europeans were that they were able to make vast amount of money from Africa's natural resources and were able to further their financial growth because they were no obliged to pay the African laborers. A negative effect for the white's was that they lost vast amounts of money in order to obtain and keep the colony in order. Imperialism had both gains and loss's in both the Africans and the Europeans.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The importance of studying history lies in the fact that by analyzing past events, one can gain insight on how something came to be. The fact that many countries in Africa today are underdeveloped for example, can be explained by European colonization and exploration in the past. Some historians would disagree with this view and assert that European colonialism actually served a moral purpose and was mutually beneficial to both parties. They argue that European influence in the area led to political centralization and an overall improvement in infrastructure. Also, defenders of this view tend to underestimate the impacts of the Atlantic slave trade by mentioning that slavery was already a part of Africa prior to European arrival. This essay will analyze the impacts of European colonialism on African economy and society in order to assert whether or not European involvement has helped or has hurt development in the area. Furthermore, this paper will attempt to propose ideas to improve negative effects left behind due to European exploration in Africa.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays