Preview

The Hammurabi Code

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1232 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Hammurabi Code
A civilization can be defined as “The stage of human social development and organization that is considered most advanced”. Babylon was an important step in the development of human societies. Many of Babylon's inventions continue to influence lifeways today. Babylon developed the world’s first written legal code and caused profound changes and advancements in astronomy and math. Through Babylon’s many inventions and superior control over its people it gained power and wealth as a city, and as a result grew more advanced. Babylon can be considered a civilization that is advanced and organized because of its great progress in justice systems, social hierarchy and improvements in women’s lives living in ancient Babylon.
Babylon’s justice
…show more content…
Social hierarchy helped ensure organization and order within the civilization of Babylon. The population of Babylon consisted on three classes: “the amelu, the muskinu and the ardu” and each class had its own privileges and role in society. The amelu consisted of the King and court, higher officials, professionals and craftsmen. The muskinu consisted of a free man who was landless. Finally, the ardu consisted of slaves. This system was regulated by Hammurabi’s code of laws that distinctly laid out the expectations and consequences for each class therefore causing an advanced and intricate system for all people to follow. However, each class was not equal, for example if someone of a greater class hurts someone of a lower class, instead of receiving the same, they may pay a fine. Hammurabi’s code of laws ensured social order or consequence and held people accountable for their actions. Now that the expectations for social order were clearly stated within Hammurabi’s code of laws, people could now move onto more important items for which to advance Babylon, further characterizing it as a civilization. Hammurabi’s code also reinforced social stratification and the organization of Babylon that further advanced the civilizations ways and separated itself from previous …show more content…
Women’s rights were now protected by the Hammurabi code, when previously any rights women had were not protected by a written code and could easily be challenged or put up for interpretation. Hammurabi’s code left no room for interpretation. Although the main role of married women living in ancient Babylon was to have children, especially boys to be heirs, they did enjoy rights granted by the Hammurabi code such as the right to divorce their husband, a revolutionary right at the time. During the Babylonian civilization women were not completely independent from men and did rely on men for support, however they had full power to remove themselves independently from a bad relationship, if found blameless for the marriage failure. Women and men almost experienced equality during the Babylonian civilization, however this equality would prove to be short lived and by the end of the Babylonian empire and the rise of the Assyrians women had lost almost all of their rights. Women were no longer allowed to attend schools or hold positions of authority. This loss of rights directly relates to the rise of Assyrian monotheism. As societies grew more complex, it can be argued that women’s roles in them grew less and less important for business and society

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The year is 1700 BC in Babylon and a new age has just began. A leader by the name of Hammurabi has introduced one of the oldest recorded set of laws. Hammurabi was a powerful military leader. He led Babylon to take control of most of Mesopotamia. He wrote the laws after being instructed to write them by many powerful gods including Shamash, the great god and judge of Heaven and Earth. Hammurabi’s Code includes 282 laws with punishments for each law. Hammurabi’s Code was described in the bible as “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”. Hammurabi’s Code was just because it protected the weak, promoted the social welfare, and came from a higher power.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you know who was the king of Babylon and what he did? About 4,000 years ago, Hammurabi, a king in Babylon, created a code of 282 laws to protect the weak. I think that his laws were fair.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest and the oldest ancient civilizations of the world. This civilization flourished around 3000 B.C. on the piece of fertile land, now known as Iraq, between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. Before 1792 B.C., the city-states of ancient Mesopotamia were not united and constantly clashed in turmoil and warfare. In 1792 B.C., King Hammurabi conquered and merged the neighboring city states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire and becoming the sixth king of its capitol city, Babylon. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order and funded irrigation, defense, and religious projects. He personally took care of and governed the administration. In fact, in 1786, he wrote two hundred eighty-two laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, ethics, business, prices, trade, and every other aspect of ancient life—this set of laws became known as “the Code of Hammurabi.” Carved upon a black stone eight feet high where everyone could read them, this Code was an improvement from previous lawless dynasties. However, these laws—compared to some other ancient laws such as the Mosaic Law and Roman Justinian Code—were unfair, unjust, and based on the social classes.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Which of the following pairs correctly identifies the subjects illustrated on the Royal Standard of Ur?…

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine this: you are walking around in an outdoor market when you feel someone take your wallet. You turn around and you see a person. You accuse them of stealing your wallet and it gets taken to trial, when right in the middle a person comes in and confesses to the crime. Suddenly, the current trial ends and a new trial begins: against you. The judge decides to cut your hands off for falsely accusing someone while the thief gets away scot-free (Journey Across Time). I bet you’re thinking that it would be totally unfair to get your hands cut off while a thief gets away with stealing your wallet, just because you thought someone else stole it, then you are completely correct. However, if you lived during Hammurabi’s rule, then this situation might have actually happened. Hammurabi was an ancient king who ruled a small city-state in Mesopotamia, called Babylonia. Hammurabi ruled for 42 years from 1792 BCE (Before Current Era)-1834 BCE. Around Hammurabi’s 38th year of rule, he created a law code which he carved on a large stone column called a stele. Now you know a little background, we can start answering our main question: Was Hammurabi’s Code just? I don’t think so and here are three reasons why.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If loss of egalitarian values were a detrimental factor in the formation of river valley then the scale of hierarchy, patriarchy, and monarchy in the second wave empires could be considered ruinous. This unfair treatment of human beings was an unfortunate trait that both civilizations and empires shared. Hierarchies of class came about as one of the major turning points of human history in the first civilizations though unequal distribution of wealth and resources, ant were solidified by laws that kept them in place. In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi declared that if a commoner was strike to a man of his rank he would only have to pay a small fine, but if he dared to touch a man of a senior rank he would be reprimanded severely by being publicly whipped. Likewise, class differences played an important role in second-wave civilizations. In the Mauryan and Gupta empires, the caste system was an indicator of spiritual development, one 's position, and whether or not they were pure. Additionally, under Qin and Han dynasties there was sever class hierarchy with dominance of bureaucratic elites which gave rise to peasant rebellions. Patriarchy was also present in both river-valley societies and second wave empires. What started out as men and women playing equal roles in society soon turned to women staying at home and taking care of children while men went out to farm and fight in wars. This led to ideology that men were to be regarded as higher than women in society. Evidence of this can also be observed in Mesopotamian laws which dictated that men could hold certain privileges while women could not, such as being considered as a victim of rape. This way of thinking can also be found in Roman society. Centuries of empire building and warfare led to idea that a man could hold absolute control over his wife and had the right to kill her…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Code Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is much to be learned about societies throughout history just from reading the texts that originated from them. Hammurabi’s Code, Zarathustra’s teachings on Good and Evil, Laozi’s Living in Harmony with Dao and Ibn Battuta’s text on Customs all provide a narrative on different aspects of culture including religious practice, governance, architecture, and societal structure.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Hammurabi Dbq

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Babylonia was a patriarchal society, having no equality between men and women. With laws restricting women to money, work, and marriage, they had little to no rights at all. Women’s role in society consisted of taking care of their children and the house. Women were mostly inferior to men when it came to marriage rules. A women at that time was property to her husband, meanwhile the husband controlled every aspect of the marriage, and could do whatever he pleased.(Mary Deering, Study.com) An example of this in Hammurabi's code is rule number 129; “. If a man's wife be surprised (in flagrante delicto) with another man, both shall be tied and thrown into the water, but the husband may pardon his wife and the king his slaves.” But on the other hand, rule number 138 states a man can leave his wife freely without getting throwing into any water, “if a man wishes to separate from his wife who has borne him no children, he shall give her the amount of her purchase money and the dowry which she brought from her father's house, and let her go.” The inequality between men and women are clear and defined by Hammurabi’s…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabis Code

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Codes of Law were broken into certain categories. These categories are not definitely known, but the majority of historians believe them to be: family, labor, personal property, real estate, trade and business. Many think the codes were too strict and the punishments too harsh. Hammurabi just believed that the punishment should fit the crime and that the strong should not dominate the weak.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunter Gatherer

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code of Laws is often described as an important new “technology” of rule because it established clear expectations of rights, obligations, and possible penalties for all Mesopotamians, thereby making delegation of ruling power easier while also providing people with the stability if knowing what to expected of them. The codes also give modern-day people a clear picture of Mesopotamian values as well as their social and gender differences. Summarize the limitations and rights that Mesopotamian women have.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi's Code

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “If a man strikes the slave girl of a free man and causes her to lose the fruit of her womb, he shall pay two shekels of silver.” A non slave would be paid ten shekels of silver. Isn’t that unfair? Hammurabi was the king of Babylonia in the 18th century B.C.E. He is very important. He wrote one of the world’s oldest sets of laws, which now is studied by many people. I feel Hammurabi’s code is unjust because of its Property laws, Family laws, and Personal-Injury laws.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the most part in the modern world, all people are thought to be created and therefore treated equally. It is instinctual for humans to act in a moral way towards others, and the law in theory protects innocent people from crime and civil injustice. But in ancient Babylonia these standards of society were not present. Hammurabi’s Code, was not in correlation with the modern sense of morality. There is a distinct difference between what is right, and what is the law. But because the government has authority over its citizens, then most people will feel an obligation to act in accordance with whoever it is in the position of authority. A very prevalent theme in Hammurabi’s Code is that of “An eye for an eye,” or the concept that if someone causes harm to another person, then the perpetrator should receive an equal punishment. In the case of a robbery or a minor crime, this concept would seem reasonable. But there are many instances where this idea becomes immoral. For example, if a man’s house collapses and then kills him, the builder or architect of the house would be sent to death as well. Hammurabi’s code does not account for coincidences or mistakes.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Babylonian Empire, under the rule of King Hammurabai, created laws to unify his empire and preserve order. This set an example for the rest of the world’s civilizations to copy. He achieved this by developing his code of laws. Through these laws, he also gave certain rights to the under-represented citizens of Mesopotamia, the women and slaves. These were the first set of laws to apply to everyone so that all people would know their rights and responsibilities. This united the people of his empire and Babylonia thrived. They built roads and created a postal service. They kept irrigation systems working properly for agriculture and this provided plenty of food. Its location on the Euphrates River made Babylon an important center of trade and helped the empire’s economy. The arts flourished as the citizens now had their basic needs met and they could pursue leisure activities.…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Hammurabi's Laws

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Babylonian people’s laws focused upon their society, economy and religion because they had strong morals that influenced their decisions surrounding these three things. These three aspects of the Babylonian Civilization seemed to not only be things that shaped the Babylonian laws, but also their culture. Successful farming, being high up on the social pyramid, and following the religion of the group were things that enhanced a person’s life and in the end may have determined their survival. Hammurabi used the concept of religion to reinforce his power. The text says, “Then Anu and Bel [gods] called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land…” (Doc. A). The Babylonian people…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although our society today may want to be under a stricter rule of conduct, the laws we are under today are shaped to fit us in the best way. A Babylonian document, Hammurabi’s Code of Laws, consists of a set of laws enforced to discipline people. The laws are most based on social classes in which people were in. For example in The Code, one of the law states, “If he be a freeman, he (the physician) shall receive five shekels.” Basically meaning if he be a slave, or lower class man, he will not be paid if done a physician’s job. But he was a known physician and isn’t a freeman, he’d be paid five shekels. So are we better off with our present set of laws? Or is it in the best interest for our society to follow Hammurabi’s Code?…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays