Preview

The Good Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Good Life
The good life is a condition in which a person will be the most happy. Both Plato and Aristotle see the good life as the state in which a person exhibits total virtue. Plato reasons that a person will exhibit total virtue when his desires have been extinguished, while Aristotle believes the perfect state will bring forth the virtue in men. Plato argues that the good life springs from love because through love, men can rid themselves of desires. That is not to say that every loving relationship creates the good, only that love is actually the quest for that good. Aristotle argues that the good life is different for each individual because it comes from living one's life according to one's virtues, and each person has different virtues. While both Plato and Aristotle agree that good life is the exhibition of perfect virtue, they disagree on the particular definition of virtue, and it's relevance to happiness, and therefore disagree on the means of attaining happiness. Plato sees the good life as being attained through the perfect love and lack of desire, while Aristotle believes that the good life is achieved through a perfect state which causes its citizens to act upon their virtues. The original Platonic view of the world is that it is a two tiered place, the upper tier being the world of perfection, the lower tier being the world of reality, and love falling somewhere in between. The theory is that the plane of reality is an imperfect copy of the plane of perfection. According to the Platonic view, humans only see glimpses of the good while existing in the plane of reality. Plato believes that love is the midpoint between reality and perfection, mortality and immortality. Love does not fall into the sphere of immortals and perfection because how could love be a god if he is not in possession of beautiful and good things? (Plato, 38). Since Love is the love of beautiful things, Love must have desires and therefore cannot be a god (Plato, 36). Yet Love is greater

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Everyone in society has different views on the best kind of life. Some people think that the best kind of life is one that is filled with family. Some may think that it is concerning living life without any regrets and being prosperous, healthy and having someone to share it all with. But this is not the case for Socrates. Having very profound views about what could be called the best kind of life for a human being. This paper is going to explore four areas that Socrates believes makes up the best kind of life for humans. The fist point that this paper is going too examine the values and how it was vital for Socrates. Secondly this paper is going to explore virtue. The Third point of this paper is the pursuit of happiness. And lastly…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because people only live once, they desire a happy and successful life, in other words, a “good life.” To complete this goal of a good life, a majority of society will do nearly everything possible to be comfortable and be happy. The extremes, which people go to in order to achieve what they think is necessary, are merely shadows, or illusions of reality that are believed to lead people to a good life. However, according to the prominent Greek philosopher, Plato, the good life is one in which individuals are not entirely comfortable and happy. The good life is one in which they are finding the ultimate truth and becoming open-minded, sometimes forcing them to oppose the norms of society, and escape the shadows. Though it is hard to do, people who abandon the “cave” of false reality and misinterpretation will live a true good life. The people who have escaped the cave have enlightened themselves by thinking…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Good Life Vivian

    • 2794 Words
    • 12 Pages

    “Are you sure this is what you really want?” asked Betsy. “Of course this is what I want to do!” replied Vivian as they walked into the local barbershop. Vivian was an idealist secretary at a local law office. Although she really liked her job, she dreamed of a better life of fame and grandeur.…

    • 2794 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato Form of the Good

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plato believed in two worlds, the material world and the world of the Forms. The Forms differ from material objects because they are perfect and pure; while material objects are a complex mixture of imperfect properties of the Forms. According to Plato the Form of the Good is the highest reality of all. As well as being individual forms, things like truth, beauty, justice and equality also reflect the Form of Goodness. ‘Goodness’ is a quality that all the individual Forms possess. The Form of the Good links all the other Forms together.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the quest to find out what is the ultimate human good, Aristotle dedicated Book 1 of the Nicomachean Ethics to provide an account of what is the ultimate human good, and what it consists of. This essay will examine why Aristotle thinks that eudaimonia (happiness), is the ultimate human good. Through this discussion, we will see Aristotle suggest four central views which are critical to eudaimonia being the ultimate human good. Firstly, one has to live a life according to one’s function. Secondly, natural, virtuous activity is required in order to live a life of happiness. Thirdly, one requires possessing external goods such as wealth, power and friends in order to be happy. Last but not least, in order to live a life of happiness, one has to live a whole life in accordance to virtue in order to determine if the person lived a happy life.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his writings he has describes two contrasting views of the important issue that is ultimately asking the question, why be moral? Plato and Thrasymachus represent the different and some-what opposing ideas on this topic of morality and self interest. Thrasymachus believes that the right thing to do is act unjustly or unmorally because one should always proceed to act in one's own self interest. He states, "Why should I be moral when it is not in my interest to be so?" This is called egoism proper. In his mind the perfect life would be to have a great reputation for living in perfect justice while being completely unjust. This would constitute a life of benefits, pleasure and rewards of injustices while still maintaining the reflection of a good…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Platos cave

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Have you ever wanted to find the answer to your problems and live in such a state without the misconceptions of reality? According to Plato everything in our world is just an image of the perfect object. In The Cave by Plato he describes how these people are chained up and they see these shadows on the wall. These shadows are an example of the objects we see in our everyday life (the visible world). Plato says that there is such a presence of “The Good” and that this Good rules this perfect spiritual world in which there is only truth and knowledge. I believe that the good that Plato is talking about is symbolic of God. God is the almighty ruler of the spiritual world, which Plato describes, but does not give any name to The Good. What Plato also does not do is provide us with how to get out of the cave. He tells us that outside the cave is this greatness and makes people want to reach it. Which brings up many questions including: How does someone escape the cave and reach the good? One must give up materialistic goods in order to live an abundant life because material goods only provide temporary happiness and distract from leading you to “The Good”.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this section I will explain Aristotle’s definition of eudaimonia and its relationship to happiness, morality and the virtues. Aristotle defines eudaimonia in the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics as “virtuous activity in accordance with reason” and that this is the highest good for human beings. For Aristotle, eudaimonia can be translated into a “human life of flourishing” since it occurs throughout a person’s life. This lifelong happiness is complete and sufficient in itself, meaning that a person lives it as an end in itself and not for anything else beyond it. An important aspect of reaching our own eudaimonia is to function well as human beings. Aristotle presents his concept of the human function by stating that what makes human function so distinct is not just to obtain nutrition and to grow because that aspect of life is shared with plants and it is also not perception because that is something shared with animals. Our ultimate human function therefore is reason and not just reason alone but to act in accordance to reason.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle uses politics and ethics together to explain the good life. People generally disagree as to the nature and conditions of happiness. Some people believe that happiness is wealth, honor, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle thinks that wealth is not happiness because wealth is just a monetary value, but can still be used to gain some happiness. Not directly of course, money can only buy a person objects that can bring them happiness for a short period of time. Just like wealth, honor is not happiness, because honor focuses more on the people, rather then the honoree. Pleasure is not happiness, because "the life of gratification" is "completely slavish", since most of the people in the polis decided to live their life based on the way animals live. The people are punished for things not accepted and reward for actions excepted. The last is virtue, and virtue is not happiness either, since one could be virtuous and not use it. Instead, Aristotle says that happiness is a combination of the four. Thus, Aristotle describes the good life by saying that, "the…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Epicurus developed a philosophy with human happiness as its goal. In his view, all humans desire to be happy. Sadly, humans are not very proficient at determining what will make them genuinely happy. Epicurus thought that all one really needs to be happy is to live a self-sufficient life without pain, surrounded by loving friends while not fearing God and/or death, in a peaceful society. Plato, on the other hand, believed that a person’s morality determined his or her level of happiness. A truly moral person would be happy and fulfilled.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found the idea of ‘good’ in Book 1 to be particularly interesting. Aristotle begins Politics by defining that a state is defined by its “view to some good” (1252a1). He later goes on to define that the state exists “for the sake of a good life” after its citizens have met their bare necessities. What does Aristotle mean by ‘good’? Does it mean happiness?…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both plato and Sophocles portray ethical ideals of the rational soul who's primary value is virtue. Plato believes that all humans are equal and that being morally good is the same for everyone and would criticize Sophocles for his portrayal of tragedy befalling selectively upon a single person at the whims of the gods. Not only is Oedipus essentially a good person given a devastating fate for no foreseeable reason but is unable to change it despite being morally disgusted at the the actions the prophecy depicts him to commit. In Plato’s philosophy everyone is able to pursue the perfect goodness found beyond the material world in the realm of the Forms in the hopes of their soul being at harmony and living a good…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aim of Man Notes

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Basically Aristotle explains the definitions of Good, Statecraft and the study of Ethics. Where the definition of Good is where all things are to be aimed for example health. Then comes the definition of Statecraft is where is the rate of infinity the desire to have it all. Finally comes the definition of Study of Ethics which talks about the pure excellence of justice which involves the disagreements and agreements of uncertainity and certainity. Arittole also talks about Happiness and where a certain point can be overlooked and how arguments can be led from first principles. Plato did infact question this and asked this alot. First principles came about in a variety of ways: by induction, direct perception, and habituation. The question then leads to where the sources of Happiness come from but a result of virtue of learning or some kind of training. Because the virtue of learning and the some kind of training is rewarded by a blessing that is generally shared but with the exception of the virtue being stunted. Happiness is built on no secure foundation almost like a Chameleon. But why is Happiness a Chameleon?…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays