Preview

The Fairness Doctrine: United States Federal Communications Commission

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fairness Doctrine: United States Federal Communications Commission
Introduced in 1949, The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that required broadcasters who expressed opinions about controversial issues to give airtime to the other side. Its intent was to provide balance and increase the amount of opinion available to the public.
The FCC eliminated the Doctrine in 1987. The FCC formally removed the language that implemented the Doctrine, in August of 2011. In practice, opponents argued the Fairness Doctrine stifled free speech by intimidating broadcasters and driving up the cost of broadcasting editorials, and it served as a handy weapon against political opponents.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Date of Decision: June 28th, 1996. The portion of the regulations, which permitted cable operators to restrict offensive or indecent programming on leased cable channels, was constitutional. However, those portions of the regulations, which allowed the operator, tore strict such programming on public access channels, and which required cable operators to put patently offensive programming on separate channels, which cannot be received unless a viewer requests to have the channel "unblocked," were unconstitutional restrictions on free speech.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court’s controversial decision in its 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision to ban limits on independent political expenditures by corporations incited a massive national dialogue over the issue of corporate personhood and corporations’ rights to free speech. Though politicians, including the President of the United States, and political commentators have referred to the decision as a shocking affront to democracy, the decision stands upon jurisprudence extending back nearly 150 years. The essential question that campaign finance issues beg is whether or not money should be considered speech. In this paper, I will argue that it is impossible to separate speech from the money that enables its dissemination. Further, I have developed…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 5 Govt 1

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Objective 2: Describe the different standards by which the Supreme Court has determined whether restrictions on freedom of speech are acceptable.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Thomas Sowell’s article, “The Fallacy of Fair”, he makes it clear that he believes many of the people who utilize the term fair in politics do not truly understand it’s meaning. He urges the idea that society is often blamed for the results of the handicaps that life bestows upon groups or people, leading society to attempt to level out the playing field for those on the bottom end of the totem pole. This concept in itself portrays the real injustice considering it skews the reality of a group's true situation, causing said group to think they are better off than they are. Evidently, this robs them of the incentive to identify the true problem and to improve (Sowell, 2010).…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the thesaurus the phrase disparity is defined as being different, a lack of equality. Disparity refers to a difference in treatment or outcome, but one that does not necessarily result from intentional bias or prejudice. So in that we could conclude that one person’s skin and complexion is a disparity to another. The texture or color is different.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richards, David A. J. “Melville B. Nimmer Symposium: Article: A Theory of Free Speech” UCLA Law Review, 1987…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inmates Rights Paper

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Awarding individual rights to violators of the law created concern for public order advocates. In 1974, the courts developed a principle known as a balance test. A balance test is,…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herbeck, Tedford (2007). Boston College: Freedom of Speech in the United States (fifth edition) Zacchini vs. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company 433 U.S. 562 Retrieved on March 2, 2008 from http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/zacchini.html…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The exclusionary rule was first introduced in 1914 during the case Weeks v. United States. . In this case a federal marshal conducted a search without having the proper warrant and seized illegal lottery tickets. The Weeks Court felt that the only effective way to enforce the Fourth Amendment right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures was to adopt a rule that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the case of the Federal Communications Commission vs. Fox Television Stations Inc., I will discuss the background and the role of the FCC in the United States, the history of Fox Television Stations Inc. and analyze the arguments of both sides. Based on those arguments I will answer the question did the Supreme Court get it right on the decision of this case.…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equal Opportunity Rule

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Equal opportunities rule is sometimes confused with the fairness doctrine because this doctrine, "never said that opposing views were entitled to equal time," (366), as the Equal opportunities rule mandates. The Fairness Doctrine was a regulation of the State 's Federal Communications Commission which required broadcast licensees to present controversial issues of public importance, and to present such issues in an honest, equal and balanced manner. The, "equal {opportunities} rule {basically} require {d} equal air time for all major candidates competing for political office. It was preceded by the fairness doctrine, abolished in 1987, which required radio and television broadcasters to air contrasting views on controversial public issues," (http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/society/A0909692.html).…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diversity is all about recognising and valuing individual differences and raising awareness about them. Diversity is the inclusion of people from all backgrounds to encourage everyone, respect differences and ultimately to achieve better results by using the talents of all. It means to recognise and appreciate the variety of characteristics that make individuals unique, you have to promote and celebrate individual and collective achievements.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government should not be able to compel commercial speech without showing substantial government interest, supported by the Central Hudson test because a less strict protection of compelled commercial speech would not only give more power to government but also violate the First Amendment. Moreover, the Zauderer standard fits under the Central Hudson test and thus should not be treated as a separate test. The Court has started to award a higher degree of protection to commercial speech with passing time (explain how I agree with the court’s higher protection and why). [THESIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS BUT MORE OR LESS THIS IS THE THESIS IDEA].…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment means unequal behavior toward someone because of a protected characteristic, and it is protected under Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act. A disparate treatment violation occurs when an individual of a protected group is shown to have been singled out and treated less favorably than others in a similar situation on the basis of a characteristic that is protected under Title VII. For a disparate treatment claim to be upheld in court it must be plausible and shows that the employer intentionally discriminated.*** The issue is whether the employer’s actions were motivated by discriminatory intent. Discriminatory intent can be shown either by direct evidence, or through indirect or circumstantial evidence, but it must be…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays