Preview

The Execution Of Charles I 1649 Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Execution Of Charles I 1649 Analysis
The Execution of Charles I, 1649 In the article, The Execution of Charles I, 1649, Charles trouble as King started once he inherited the throne and he was the sole blame for his own death. His marriage to a Roman Catholic princess caused Protestants to question his rule and when “he attempted to impose an Anglican form of worship on the predominantly Presbyterian population” (page 1), this caused riots. Then he summoned Parliament to get funds to abolish the Scots uprising, but they denied it, and called on Parliament again on December 1640. Parliament and the King’s had their dilemmas, so the Civil War continued for six years. Finally, the King was charged and sentenced to death. His execution happened on 30 January 1649 and the account
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Man He Killed Analysis
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Man He Killed Analysis

    War is not only causes physical injuries, but emotional ones as well. Throughout history, soldiers returning from war have acquired emotional damage after enduring to the harsh conditions of combat. They suffer from illnesses such as PTSD or Post Traumatic Stress disorder, a disorder in which traumatizing experiences from the past still affect an individual to which they are unlike themselves anymore. Along with PTSD they suffer from moral injury, the pain that results from damage to a person's moral foundation. In All Quiet on The Western Front By Erich Maria Remarque and Thomas Hardy's’ “The Man He Killed” characters struggles with the emotional effects of war. Despite the internal struggle faced by Paul and the speaker from the poem, both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Can the Years 1661-67 Be Seen as Succesful for Charles
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To What Extent Can the Years 1661-67 Be Seen as Succesful for Charles

    In terms of finance, it can be argued that the situation was not successful. The Government managing it could not provide a stable financial settlement. Largely the King did not have much in the way of money, and Charles' excessive spending on pleasurable activities, at the beginning of his reign only exacerbated the disastrous financial situation. Initially, although Charles agreed to give up feudal dues that were revived by his father, he was granted an annual income of £1.2 million by Parliament. However, this arrangement had two drawbacks. Firstly, the financial settlement that Charles was given, was simply not adequate to his needs. Secondly, the hearth tax that was imposed to raise the money was highly unpopular to the people. It is hard to say a reign is 'successful' if the Monarch is unpopular, especially as the country at that time, was still suffering from the financial situation left behind by the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap American History Dbq
    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ap American History Dbq

    During the 1630 's, there was a religious civil war. This war was between the Puritans, also known as the Protestants, and the Cavaliers, also known as the Catholics. This relgious war lasted from the year 1642 until the year of 1651. During this time, King Charles I was the monarch of England. His father, James I was ruler prior. James did not change anything about England after Queen Elizabeth 's death. He did not change the government, nor the religion. Unlike his father, Charles believed that Catholicism must be enforced in England. Because of Charles and his changing of religion, the civil war in England took place.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How To Charles I's Decision To Impose A Prayer Book In Ireland
    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How To Charles I's Decision To Impose A Prayer Book In Ireland

    Charles’ decision to impose a prayer book on Scotland in 1637 proved to be an ill-advised move. It was due in part to Charles’ obsession with creating a unified Kingdom based on his strongly held Laudian religious ideas. Without understanding the Scottish plight he brashly introduced the prayer book, triggering a Scottish backlash against not only against religious reforms but Charles’ foreign rule. Rallying behind their National Covenant, the Scottish manoeuvred Charles into a position through the First and Second Bishops Wars where he was forced to call Parliament. This…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?

    One of the first things that Charles did once he had removed Parliament from the equation was to end the wars with Spain and France. This would stop him spending unnecessary money, and it would mean that he would not need Parliament to aid him in gaining any more, though he swiftly realised that he needed to find some new sources of income on his own. He went about discovering these using financial antiquarianism i.e. he looked back in history for ways to make money through taxes without creating new Acts of Parliament. One of the most famous of these was 1634 Ship Money. Ship Money was an ancient tax payable by those in coastal communities for their defence. Originally, it was only imposed on these coastal areas, though in 1636, Charles extended it to the whole country, with payment on an annual basis. Ship Money was a big earner – Charles achieved 90% of what he needed through each annual tax. However, opposition to these taxes was growing, and in 1637, and man by the name of John Hampden refused to pay. Hampden was taken to court and ultimately put into jail. This example of rebellion caused the opposition to strengthen even more, with the whole country being aware that it was Charles who imposed these rules. Another…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Charles The First Move Against Parliament
    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Charles The First Move Against Parliament

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Salem Witchcraft Trials Of 1692 Analysis
    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Salem Witchcraft Trials Of 1692 Analysis

    I think that there are multiple theories for why the events of 1692 took place. Superstition is the belief in the paranormal connection. In the articles "Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive." Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive. Web. 25 Apr. 2016. "Salem Witch Museum." Salem Witch Museum. Web. 25 Apr. 2016. "The Salem Witchcraft Trials of 1692." The Salem Witchcraft Trials of 1692. Web. 25 Apr. 2016. William Griggs, township physician, was summoned. He insinuated that the girls' ailments might have a supernatural source. His analysis was that the girls were bewitched. The people of Salem had a strong faith in the devil, groups among Salem Village partisans and opposition with a nearby Salem Town, a recent small pox epidemic and the intimidation…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Eurasian Rulers
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Eurasian Rulers

    Oliver Cromwell was a general for the Puritans during England's civil war. Cromwell captured Kin Charles for treason and had him executed. Cornwell now held power of England. He became a military dictator after ripping a constitution. Ireland then rebelled against him, so he sent an army to crush the rebels. 616,000 Irish died. After Cromwell's death the parliament appointed Charles II as ruler. Charles restored monarchy and brought back sports and theater.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    parliament frq
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    parliament frq

    After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fred Fernando Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fred Fernando Capital Punishment Analysis

    Fred Romano believes that the death penalty is not for revenge, but for justice. Romano found his newly-wedded daughter dismembered, abused, routed, and lifeless after she didn't answer his calls. Romano speculates that one day people will claim that the life without parole sentence is too severe, and a bill will pass that permits killers to get out of prison without parole. Romano strongly believes that the death penalty is justice for murderers. The death penalty reduces crime, wakes up society, and helps victims' families. The death penalty should be used to punished violent criminals.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Satyre On Charles II
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Satyre On Charles II

    This poem is one of the most difficult to establish a definitive version for. Here, I present the poem as Vieth published it in his 1968 edition of the Earl's poetry, along with Vieth's notes.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A King at War with Parliament
    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A King at War with Parliament

    The English Civil War began in 1642 between King Charles I and Parliament. Wealthy nobles, known as Royalists, supported the king. Supporters of Parliament included Puritans, who were led by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell eventually became commander-in-chief of Parliament’s army. A number of battles took place between the king’s troops and Cromwell’s army, some of which are shown on the map below. The first battle, which took place at Edgehill, did not gain ground for either side. After a series of victories, however, Cromwell and Parliament took control of London and, eventually, England. In 1649 Charles I was publicly beheaded, and Parliament alone ruled England.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolutism vs. Constitutionalism
    • 36747 Words
    • 147 Pages

    Absolutism vs. Constitutionalism

    Early modern Europe – defined approximately as the period between 1450 and 1750 – was a revolutionary era during which political, economic, social, and intellectual upheavals abounded. The late medieval period witnessed political struggles between monarchs and nobles and between church and state. Renaissance ideas and ideals stimulated political debate and furthered conflict between political contenders. The Reformations of the sixteenth century – both Protestant and Catholic – exacerbated political realities as religious movements required monarchs to defend a chosen religious status within their realms as well as to deal with religious issues and choices in adjacent areas. Financing many of the conflicts was an influx of wealth taken from non-European areas during the Age of Exploration and Conquest. This money allowed some monarchs – and encouraged others to attempt – to establish increasingly effective and authoritative central governments. The influx of specie also led to a more relevant middle class, a relatively less powerful upper class, and a price revolution, all of which added to the turmoil.…

    • 36747 Words
    • 147 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics