The Debate over Retirement Age
1. Should all pilots have to retire at the age of 60? As I read the article it seems to be an interesting point that has risen. Several questions come in to play when considering if a pilot should retire or have the capability of remaining working. As one would see it on one side. There are pros and cons to either way you look at the situation. Looking at the history of implementation of pilots being forced to retire at age 60, it was first introduced back in 1959, (Hayes, 2012). With the increase in technology, it would make one try and research if this policy needs to be revised. First, if you were to agree with retirement at the age of 60; the article explains there are health issues that come up around this age. But, after further research doctors who has examined and tested pilots who are over the age of 60 call the retirement rule unjust, (Hayes, 2012). So, it really makes you think does the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) just want those individuals to retire due to possible liability issues? These are questions that need to be addressed. Those individuals who are in disagreement with the mandate of pilots retiring over the age of 60 feel that the FAA wants seasoned pilots when it comes to being in the cockpit. “Experience comes one day at a time,” says Rodney Russell (airline capital), (Hayes, 2012). So, in actuality the airline pilots are saying a seasoned pilot comes with experience in the field. In order to gain experience pilots need have the capability of working past the mandated age of 60. So, in terms of if I believe that pilots should retire at the age of 60, it would be wise for one to disagree. There have been no significant data or information that indicates pilots over the age of 60 have a decline in a pilot’s cognitive function or increase of sickness and illnesses. 2. How would you study this issue to raise the age to 65? Looking at the issue of mandating pilots to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document