Preview

The Day Commmodus Killed A Rhino Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Day Commmodus Killed A Rhino Analysis
In Jerry Toner’s book The Day Commodus Killed a Rhino: Understanding the Roman Games, the reader is introduced into the violent, blood thirsty society that is the Roman Empire. In the prologue to the book, Toner writes “One modern writer described these ‘bloodthirsty human holocausts’ as ‘by far the nastiest blood-sport ever invented. He claimed that ‘the two most quantitatively destructive institutions in History are Nazism and the Roman Gladiators’.” The Roman Empire, as a whole, was a violent society. Their violence though, was something that was celebrated and embodied by Romans. In Jerry Toner’s book The Day Commodus Killed a Rhino: Understanding the Roman Games, it becomes evident through the Romans “bread and circus” society, that being …show more content…
Likewise, being violent natured was simply who they were as a society.
When reading about the Roman gladiator games as well as the chariot races and theater events, it can be quite difficult to truly envision what it was like for the participants and the spectators of such events. The participants in such activities were overall viewed as low-class citizens. Gladiators, charioteers and actors in the theater all “had little more status than slaves.” The participants of the games were meant to entertain the spectators, and nothing else. Besides the fact that the participants were seen as low class, they also faced very brutal conditions in the games. The gladiators and charioteers were susceptible to violent, gory deaths. For gladiators, often times their throats were cut and the knives eventually made their way to the gladiator’s hearts. Another possible outcome for gladiators, was being ripped to pieces by various animals. Whether their death came by combat with another gladiator or by animal, it was nothing short of gruesome. This gruesomeness though, was enjoyed by many. Chariot
…show more content…
Coordinating these games on such a large scale was no easy task. Likewise, is important to note the different resources that it took to pull off these games. Perhaps the most important resource that was required to pull off the games was money. Without funding, the Romans would have never been able to quench their thirst for bloodshed. While Commodus’s games themselves only cost 12,000 denarii, the emperor Symmachus spent as much as 20,000,000 denarii to put on his games. Two other resources that were crucial to the games development were animals and arenas. In many emperor’s games, thousands upon thousands of animals were killed. The animals that were showcased in the gladiator aspect of the games, the chariot races and the theatrical aspect of the games included: lions, tigers, leopards, ostriches, elephants, rhinoceros, and giraffes. All of these animals were used at the Roman’s expense. Without them, the games could not have taken place. Lastly, another resource that was important to the development of the Roman’s violent games, were the arenas. Arenas had to be built for the gladiator games, the chariot races, and even the theatrical performances. Arenas that were used for the games began to be built as permanent structures as the games became a more important part of the Roman society. On page 50, Toner writes “Amphitheaters had originally been made of wood but now huge permanent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    tell me ab julius caesar

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages

    gladiators. This made Caesar extremely popular with the people, and at the height of his popularity…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blood thirsty, competitive- The Romans were competive with their plays, like today Americans are competitive with their sports…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Coriolanus, Shakespeare to a full extent questions the value of the Roman warrior code and sees the difficulties that it causes. Firstly I discuss the warrior code that is valued and held in Rome. Secondly I analyze Coriolanus inability to infringe the warrior code entirely. Thirdly I explore the consequences this has on Roman society.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The awning system was controlled by a series a poles that could be used to open and close the awning. The place where you were seated depended not on the price of the ticket, but on your social class.The building of the Colosseum helped create a place for leisure and showed the wealth of the Roman Empire. Also, the Colosseum was used to showcase the variety of exotic animals that they used to fight the gladiators. At the Colosseum, wild beasts fought in the morning, and the gladiators fought in the afternoon. Gladiators used a variety of weapons such as the oblong shield, a visored helmet, and a sword. Gladiators usually fought until one was killed. However, the life of the loser could be spared if the spectators waved handkerchiefs. Most gladiators were prisoners of war, slaves, or criminals who were required to fight in these contests. However, some free men fought for money and fame. Successful gladiators became famous in Rome. Gladiators were carefully fed, and they received medical care. They were generally housed in barracks. Most of the contests after that were held at funerals or celebrations, and were under state control.These cruel battles prepared the Roman citizens for the sight of human bloodshed, so they could endure war…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiator Movie Analysis

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By currently taking this History & Philosophy of Sports class, this film “Gladiator” establishes the whole scenery during the time period of ancient Rome. In the film, it introduced Gladiator battles. These Gladiator battles reflected as entertainment to society, as well as, being a survival setting between life and death. Not only they would compete for survival, but they would compete to become the best. By this time, Commodus, is the new Roman emperor and he fears that Maximus could use his heroic ability to dethrone him and become emperor himself. Maximus would use his fame and popularity as a gladiator to invoke further damage to Commodus' insecure dominance of the devoted Roman people, hoping to influence them to restore their lost values and overcome the corruption that…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiator Research Paper

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The end of the Gladiator games was coming, the violent games would not be forever. When Constantine came to power and made christianity the state religion people started to lose interest in the savage games. Constantine attempted to banned the games along with Theodosius and Honorius. The last known gladiator fight in the colosseum was in 404 AD, but gladiator fight were finally banned in 438 AD. However sad is may have been for some the other games such as racing beast hunts were still around to entertain the Romans.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TouchdownTouchups

    • 1417 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gladiator [glad-ee-ey-ter]: a person, often a slave or captive, who was armed with a sword or other weapon and compelled to fight to the death in a public arena against another person or a wild animal, for the entertainment of the spectators. Now consider the description of a football player [fo͝otbôl plāər]; a person, often a male, who is armed with large muscles as weapons and compelled to fight brutally until victorious in a public arena against another team, for the entertainment of the spectators. Football is essentially a modern form of gladiator sportsmanship, pinning two teams against each other without constraints or restrictions about contact and injury for the mere entertainment of the audience. The effects of this game are both physical and mental, impacting the lives of the men who have bravely sacrificed their longevity for their fans.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of armed men fighting to the death originated in Etruria, in central Italy, probably as a funeral sacrifice. The first gladiatorial exhibition in Rome was in 264BC, when three pairs of gladiators fought as part of a funeral celebration. By 174BC, at a 3-day spectacle, 37 pairs participated. Julius Caesar's large-scale exhibitions (300 pairs on one occasion) prompted the Roman Senate to limit the number of contestants. The largest contest of gladiators was given by the emperor Trajan as part of a victory celebration in AD107 and included 5000 pairs of fighters. The emperor Domitian in AD90 presented combats between women and between dwarfs. Mostly males, gladiators were slaves, condemned criminals, prisoners of war, and sometimes Christians. Forced to become swordsmen, they were trained in schools called ludi, and special measures were taken to discipline them and prevent them from committing suicide. One gladiator, Spartacus, avenged his captivity by escaping and leading an insurrection that terrorized southern Italy from 73 to 71BC. A successful gladiator received great acclaim; he was praised by poets, his portrait appeared on gems and vases, and patrician ladies pampered him. A gladiator who survived many combats might be relieved from further obligation. Occasionally, freedmen and Roman citizens entered the arena, as did the insane Emperor…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fighter, will only have one thing in mind when fighting, and both know what they are thinking. All they are thining about is to stay alive. So when fighting, there is no mercy, a gladiator will do anything too win the fight, because if he doesn’t, he will most probably die. Gladiators, are usually prisoners, from other countries, or slaves, so they have nothing to lose. Dying sometimes could be a good option for them, so they go all out not caring. Dying in an arena is almost always a brutal one, either dying from blood loss, or a slash to the head, or a cut that gets infected, it is not a nice one, thus creating another reason to why they have no mercy, and are vicious when attempting to survive.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximus was the general of Rome and a really good general at that. He lead Rome to many victories. He was so great and loyal that in the movie, Marcus Aurelius actually asked him to succeed him in the throne. When Commodus heard this from his father, he killed him and sentenced Maximus to death. When Maximus escaped, he was picked up by a group of men and sold as a slave to become a gladiator. As a gladiator, he fought many different types of gladiators. Quicker ones had nets with tridents and slower ones had curved swords with shields. There were some gladiators that even had chariots. In the actual history of Rome, there really were different types of gladiators. The gladiators with the net and trident were called the retarius. The gladiator with the curved sword and shield were called the samnite. I'm not too sure if there were gladiators that used chariots as their weapons but it sounds likely since it is thought that the colosseum was filled up and used for boat wars. Using chariots would be easy for them and entertaining for the crowd. There's a scene in the movie where it's a one on one battle between Maximus and a champion gladiator. Maximus is barely armed and protected. All he has is a sword and shield I believe. The other man has two swords, a mask for protection, and heavy armor. This shows how each type of gladiator was to fight a different kind of gladiator so the match would be even and fair.…

    • 845 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiators were not always popular, but weren’t always the ones already marked for death either. The gladiators were given prizes for pleasuring the audience with a remarkable show because they were everything in the Games. Similarly, the tributes of The Hunger Games came from various districts with different standings—the smaller the number the smaller the standing—in the country. Their presence leads to fear. Their death brought agony. Their victory brought suffering. Their defiance brought…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The seating and thoughts on the entertainment of Roman gladiators is similar to the audience experience of the Hunger Games. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games happily while people in the Districts watched painfully as young people from their district died. The Capitol watched the Hunger Games from their homes, seated and in plazas, which was much more luxurious than the Districts sitting in their homes and outside on outdated televisions and the projector. Much like the seating at the Colosseum, the Districts did not have the privilege of comfortable seating compared to the people in the Capitol. The audience experience of Roman gladiators and the Hunger Games were similar because the admission fee for both was free. This was because the leaders wanted to control the people watching the gladiatorial…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Livy's The Rise Of Rome

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With a history of people who showcase bravery, honor, and loyalty in the name of their city, the people of Rome are encouraged to act in the same way so they remain connected to Rome in every aspect of their lives. Romulus bravely founded Rome, even though it meant killing his brother. Lucius Tarquinius Superbus is a negative example of how some people in history did not show loyalty to Rome but to themselves. In his actions, Romans are able to learn that they should always be loyal to Rome first. And finally, Lucretia represents honor; her suicide allowed her to remain honorable and to avoid disgrace due to the actions of Sextus Tarquinius. Livy’s work not only details the history of the beginning of Rome but serves also as a guidebook on the ways a Roman should act when faced with challenges. These historical figures exemplify what the ideal Roman is and is not to be. By holding these figures, and many others, up as examples, Livy shows how important image and actions were to the Roman people when Rome was only Romulus’s idea and also through the reign of the kings that…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of enacting brutal acts of violence for the “pleasure of the audience” has been prevalent in human history since the time of the Romans, the only “advancement” that has been made since then is that instead of having gladiators fight to death, the subjects of torture are now animals. It is surprising that anybody gets pleasure from watching cockfights and dogfights, for the common man finds these acts atrocious and immoral and they have a sense that these acts are not only brutal, but they are also immoral and erroneous. George Will in his “The Barbarity of Boxing” discusses how these acts have magnified in severity over the years, yet not much action has been taken to fix it.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics