Preview

The Crucible Mob Mentality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Crucible Mob Mentality
Mob mentality happens when people come together because they are emotional and or angry about something. It can take just one act of violence to turn a crowd into a fury. One of the main factors that contributes to mob mentality is having the same feelings or views on an issue, such as something that is political or religious. Another factor of mob mentality is distribution of responsibility. Also, emotions are a key factor in mob mentality.
The main factor that contributes to mob mentality is having the same views on an issue. Usually when a riot or mob breaks out the people rioting have the same belief. In Goodnight and Goodluck, Murrow and Friendly decided to expose McCarthy for the fear monger he is. Both Murrow and Friendly believe McCarthy is guilty and that is why they decided
…show more content…
Not only is supporting the same idea a factor of mob mentality, but so it distribution of responsibility.
Another major factor that contributes to mob mentality is distribution of responsibility. People start to lose their individual values and principles and start to gain the mob’s values. They also believe that they can not be held accountable for their actions in a group because “everyone did it.” Most people would not engage in some of the actions that the mob does when they are alone. In The Crucible, when someone is accused of witchcraft all the young girls pretend to see the Devil, so the person accused gets hanged. They all just go with it and Mary Warren even pretends to faint. Danforth asks Mary Warren, “And you, Mary Warren, how came you to cry out people for sending their spirits against you?” Mary replied, “It were pretense, sir.” Danforth then replied, “Ah, And the other girls? Susanna Walcott, and--the others? They were also pretending?” Mary Warren confessed, “Ay, sir (Miller 210).” The girls do not see anything, they are all just acting out and truly believe since everyone is doing it they will not get caught. In an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Groupthink is when a group of people makes irrational decisions with the desire of peace and harmony.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people in Salem had no manners or respect for others. The impact of poor behavior is exhibited throughout “The Crucible”.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In both sports crowds and lynch mobs, the ‘psychology’ of the groups seems to ensure that the action is carried out with great emotion and loyalty to a cause. For example, in the last decades of the nineteenths century lynching of black people in the Southern states of USA was at an all-time high. Lynching became an institutional method used by white people to terrorise black people to maintain white supremacy. Therefore, it is clear that lynching was carried out as a result of loyalty to a cause and great emotion. This is supported by Blalock’s (1967) power-threat hypothesis which suggests that groups that pose a threat to the majority are more likely to be discriminated against and to be the subject of violent action. Lynching was an extreme form of discrimination, motivated by perceived racial threat. Similarly, Patterson (1999) claims that lynch mobs were more active during the 19th century because it was a time of major social transition, following the collapse of slavery, where the entire community felt at risk. When groups feel at risk, it becomes evolutionarily advantageous to put survival first, and as Ridley (1997) shows that cooperative group defence and antagonism to outsiders go hand in hand. This explains why, when a majority group is more at risk, individual self-interest gives way to ‘group mentality’. Therefore, acts of group display such as lynching are suggested to be the result of…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is praised to be a place that is fair and just. However, no country is perfect and one of the more unfavorable aspects of America is a problem that has been a problem that goes back to the 1600s. The issue Americans face are within the legal systems and are caused by the biases of judges and jurors across American courts. America is not alone in this problem, but for a first world country this issue is more common than it should be. In America’s modern day society there are many cases of discrimination based on physical appearances in court, as there were in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, which needs to be stopped, because it is in violation of Civil Rights Act of 1964.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Jim Crow laws were laws that African American men and woman had to follow or they will be punished. The white people thought they needed the laws to keep the other whites in the town safe from the blacks. So the blacks were considered second class citizens (Pilgrim). The Jim Crow laws were shown in To Kill a Mockingbird when Tom Robinson was at his trial and he had to call everyone Miss or Mister, while Mr. Gilmer was calling him “boy” (Lee 225).…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mob can be of many people line in front of the jailhouse, or like with Lula, she seemed to set the scene herself and be causing all the trouble. In the book the most common way to drain a mob is to make them feel insecure, embarrass them, and prove them wrong. In front of the church Calpurnia told Lula “isn’t it the same God we are worshipping?”. By that it made Lula feel like she was causing trouble and left. In front of the jailhouse Scout asked Mr. Cunningham how is entailment was going which embarrassed him and also by telling him to say “hi” to his son. After that he told everyone to get going and…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Salem spread many preposterous lies and rumors out of fear and even for their own personal gain. Naturally, blaming someone else for wrongdoing is an immediate and instinctive reaction. For example, the fear of getting in trouble can drive one to put the blame on someone else in order to avoid the consequences. The characters in The Crucible rely on blame to get out of hard situations, motivated by this aspect of fear. Towards the very beginning of the novel, Betty and Abigail have many suspicions surrounding them, and they need to direct the townspeople’s wrath away from themselves. Abigail claims that “I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil” (Miller 48)! Abigail and Betty therefore avoid their initial fate. As the book progressed, the lies piled on top of each other, and soon everyone wanted in on the action. Blame turned into a use of getting back at one another. For instance, Ann Putnam claims Rebecca Nurse “murdered seven babies by sending out her spirit on them” (Miller 56). Rebecca Nurse is falsely accused, arrested and later executed. In turn, the natural inclination to blame other leads to false accusations and overall mass hysteria.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Icke, an author, conspiracy theorist, and former football player and sportscaster once said “The human race is a herd. Here we are, unique, eternal aspects of consciousness with an infinity of potential, and we have allowed ourselves to become an unthinking, unquestioning blob of conformity and uniformity. A herd. Once we concede to the herd mentality, we can be controlled and directed by a tiny few. And we are.” Here, Icke is saying that humans often become attached to groups. They do not tend to question what is going on, as long as they feel safe and secure with any group. Humans thrive on the feeling of being included, so much so that they lose themselves and start to become one with their group. They become numb to new ideas different…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mob mentality is a unique behavioral characteristic that emerges when people are in big groups (Smith). When people would get into larger groups their behavior would completely change due to another person’s actions. Peer pressure is another reason why people change when they are in a group. Like when teens are around the wrong crowd they can be pressured into things they would not do usually (Smith). Also moods of mobs change depending on what occurs, like one small act of violence can trigger a mob to be very violent and angry (Smith). People do not think when they are in mobs they usually just do what everyone else does. Some people use a mob as an excuse to loot through people’s homes and steal belongings. They also have a chance to destroy houses and private properties of the town (Smith). Behaviors can vary from happy to confused to angry to furious. Like prison mobs tend to get violent and angry and shopper mobs get tend to be faster and trample people in the way. Mob mentality is shown a few times in To Kill a Mockingbird. When Atticus took on the Tom Robinson case a lot of the Whites in Maycomb did not support him. They called him names and kids at school made fun of Jem and Scout. A mob men also met Atticus at the jailhouse, because they did not like the fact Atticus was defending a Black man. Scout, Jem, and Dill interrupted the “meeting” and Scout did not know most of the men that were…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Crucible, the author displays the power that fear and suspicion have over people through the divine will of the main characters as it spreads throughout the community. During act three of The Crucible, Mary Warren was taken in front of the court to confess the lies and suspicion that the young girls were spreading throughout the town. While trying to confess, Mary was pressured into irrational fear of being convicted of being a witch, because of this Mary turned against Mr.Proctor, accusing him of witchcraft. Without thinking Mary let her fear control her actions, which resulted in the arrest of John Proctor. People would rather make decisions based on avoiding fear then facing them, finding the easy way out of a bad situation.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Crucible, Arthur Miller writes of the hysteria during Salem Witch Trials, hoping that the world will never do anything stupid again because of hysteria. During the Salem Witch Trials there were many people that chose to act as individuals, rather than a community. Judge Danforth, Reverend Parris , and Abigail Williams had the power to stop, and even prevent the trials, but chose not to because they did not care for anyone except themselves. Judge Danforth could have stopped the trials when he found out that he was wrong about the whole thing. Also, Parris is the reason the trails took place, and Abigail Williams fed the flame of hysteria throughout the trails. These three individual contribute to callous attitudes that exist in Salem, and cause the ultimate deaths of the innocent.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass hysteria can exist when a number of people behave in an uncontrollable, unmanageable way because of fear and/or anger. Arthur Miller easily shows this in the play The Crucible which takes place in the late 1600’s in Salem, Massachusetts when more than one-hundred people were getting accused of being witches. United State Senator Joseph McCarthy had done something similar to this when he had accused many people of being “Reds” or communists during the Red Scare going throughout the United States.Human nature prompts mass hysteria \because people with good reputations start it and it’s more likely for people to believe them and also mass hysteria occurs when people want to get back at someone for something they want. Media might bring people…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2011 English Riots

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author should have researched the history and the geography to show the audience that poverty and inequality are the primary reasons for these two riots to occur, as analogical evidence. The author should use better evidence to support the reasons for riots to occur in particular areas because of poverty. The author explains the psychological reasons for why people riot based on substantial evidence. The article contains strong testimonial evidence that a large crowd had caused people to participate the 2011 English Riots. The author used published research from psychologist Chris Frith that emotional contagion is an unconscious mechanism of transmissions between people, which brings people forming a strong alliance. The author used this concept to support that riots occur when social contagion becomes higher than an emotional state, and many people show synchronized behaviors. Also, the author explains large crowd gives anonymity to many people. For instance, social media had brought people made a safer decision to join the 2011 English Riots. Today, the use of social media has brought many people participating similar events, including the 2017 Charlottesville Riots and the Berkeley Riots.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Groupthink Bad?

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Groupthink is a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressure (Verderber, Verderber, & Sellnow, 2011). Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups (Miller, 2010). A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making (Miller, 2010).…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are eight symptoms of groupthink. The first symptom is when all or most of the group view themselves as invincible which causes them to make decisions that may be risky. The group has an enormous amount of confidence and authority in their decisions as well as in themselves. They see themselves collectively better in all ways than any other group and they believe the event will go well not because of what it is, but because they are involved. The second symptom is the belief of the group that they are moral and upstanding, which leads the group to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of the decisions. The group engages in a total overestimation of its morality. There is never any question that the group is not doing the right thing, they just act. The disregarding of information or warnings that may lead to changes in past policy is the third symptom. Even if there is considerable evidence against their standpoint, they see no problems with their plan. Stereotyping of enemy leaders or others as weak or stupid is the fourth symptom. This symptom leads to close-mindedness to other individuals and their opinions. The fifth symptom is the self-censorship of an individual causing him to overlook his doubts. A group member basically keeps his mouth shut so the group can continue in harmony. Symptom number six refers to the illusion of unanimity; going along with the majority, and the…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays