Preview

The Comparison of Rene Descartes to Paul Churchland

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Comparison of Rene Descartes to Paul Churchland
Rene Descartes and Paul Churchland are both well respected philosophers with different out-looks on the mind and body relationship. Descartes achieved many great things in his time, but at the time that he wrote Meditations on First Philosophy he seemed to be borderline insane. His ideas are too drastic and gloomy, where as Churchland’s ideas in his writing Eliminitative Materialism seems to be agreeable and bright.
Rene Descartes was a famous French Philosopher, mathematician, and scientist. Because of his work in his application of algebra to geometry we now have Cartesian geometry. His views about the relationship between the mind and body have been very influential over the last 3 centuries. He was born in La Haye (which is now known as Descartes) Tourine, France in 1596. His Family was far from wealthy but surprisingly all their children became well educated men. At eight years old Descartes was enrolled at a school of Jesuits, La Fleche in Anjou. He continued to study there for eight years. After graduating he studied at the University of Poitiers, majoring in law. He graduated their in 1616. He never practiced law but rather enrolled in the service of Prince Maurice of Nassau, who was the leader of United Provinces of the Netherlands. Descartes was fascinated with living a military life but his fascination of philosophy and mathematics soon overwhelmed his life. Descartes made a pilgrimage over to France and Italy in 1623 for many years and during that pilgrimage he studied philosophy and the science of optics. In 1628 He moved to the Netherlands where he wrote his most influential works. The first major work he wrote was Essais philosophoqies (Philosophical Essays) in 1637. It had four main parts: an essay on geometry, another on optics, a third of meteors, and Discours de la methode (Discourse on method). Other important writing of his were: Principia Philosophiae (The Principles on Methods), and the Passions of the Soul. Descartes made a huge effort



Cited: Churchland, Paul. Eliminative Materialism. Philosophical Horizons (pp 248-251) Canada: Thompson Wadsworth. Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy. Philosophical Horizons (pp 162-168). Canada: Thompson Wadsworth Hodges, Miles H. “Rene Descartes (1596 to 1650).” newgenevacenter.org, 2000. 17 April 2006. <http://www.newgenevacenter.org/biography/descartes2.htm> “Paul Churchland.” Answers.com, 17 April 2006. <http://www.answers.com/topic/paul-churchland

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes lived from 1596 to 1650. He was born in France, and went to a Jesuit primary school. He earned a law degree, but later on he began focusing on math and logic in the world. During the early 17th century, his ideas deviated more and more from previous philosophers. Because of this, he became known as “The Father of Modern Philosophy.” While some of his ideas weren’t completely original, his way of getting to them was. He believed in totally ignoring everything previous philosophers had done, and starting new, as if their work had never happened. He did not even trust his own emotions. He also believed that consciousness was the only truth in the world, leading to his most famous statement, “I think; therefore I am.” He also published several books, and despite his late entrance in the subject, and early death, he is still one of the most…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many individuals deserving of praise and admiration. These individuals were all admirable in their own regard. One of the most significant of these individuals was Rene Descartes. Rene Descartes was an admirable individual due to his contributions to philosophy, his remarkable findings in mathematics, and his explanations of the physical world that are still relevant today. Descartes came up with the philosophical arguments of Cartesian doubt, the Mind-Body problem, and Cartesian certainty. In regards to Mathematics, Descartes discovered numerous principles and theorems that paved the way for future discoveries in mathematics. His most notable findings included Cartesian Coordinates, Cartesian Geometry, and "Discourse on Method". In addition to this, Descartes had numerous explanations of the physical world. His most prominent explanations are the first modern formulation of laws of nature, theory of planetary motion, and the study of reflection and refraction of light.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 287 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rene Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher. He’s known as the founder of modern philosophy. He applied the idea of the clockwork mechanism to the human body. During the 17th century Descartes came up with the idea of dualism. This idea was described as, the mind and body being two separate realms that interact to form the human experience. He employed a method called methodological skepticism, meaning, he rejected any ideas that could be doubted. He came to the conclusion that he can be certain that he exists because he thinks. Descartes is, also, known for the Wax Argument. He claimed if he looked at a piece of wax he could describe it using his senses- shape, texture, color, smell. If he moved the wax towards a flame the wax would change characteristics (A History of Modern Psychology, 2014).…

    • 287 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes begins Meditations on First Philosophy by explaining his basic purpose and how he plans on going about accomplishing this project. Descartes hopes to discover truth and justify human knowledge and belief. In order to find the fundamental truths of life, Descartes believes he must start from scratch so that he may discern truth from false beliefs. All of Descartes' beliefs, everything he has learned and grown to believe is now cast under the shadow of doubt, as he explains to us, "I will attack straightaway those principles which supported everything I once believed" (14). Descartes further explains the task which he faced as he says, "I had to raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations, if I wanted to establish anything firm and lasting in the sciences" (13).…

    • 2451 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    SKEPTICISM

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes lived during a very skeptical period, at a time before science as we know it existed, and after a long period of relative stagnation in philosophical thought during the Church-dominated and Aristotle-influenced late Middle Ages. He had been impressed, in both his academic work and in his experience of the world at large, by the realization that there appeared to be no certain way of acquiring knowledge, and he saw his main task as the epistemological one of establishing what might be certain knowledge as a stepping stone towards the ultimate pursuit of truth. His more immediate aim in this was to put scientific enquiry in a position where it was no longer subject to attack by Skeptics, and he tried to do this by a kind of…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance Dualism

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Epistemology is study of the nature of knowledge and how humans have come to believe certain ideas as true. In the 17th century, French philosopher, Rene Descartes, proposed a revolutionary explanation of the notion that there is a separate, yet causal relationship between the mind and the body. Descartes created the school of philosophical thought known as substance dualism in which he methodologically elucidates his argument that there are only two fundamental entities in the world, that being mental and physical things. In his philosophical treatise, Meditations, Descartes challenges the Monist materialistic belief that the world is only composed of physical matter by inverting this preexisting conception through a reductionist approach. On his quest for knowledge and truth, he argues that the mind and the body dichotomy involves two separate substances that have the power to influence one another. Since the body exists in the physical, material world, it has the ability to influence the mind through experiences that are conceived by sensory perceptions. Through these sensory experiences and perceptions, the mind formulates beliefs and thoughts, whereby it influences the body to react and behave in certain ways through speech and action. While Descartes claims that there is a real distinction between the mind and the body, he also believes that the two interact in a causal relationship, where the mind is better known than the body.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Substance dualism is often called ‘Cartesian dualism" ‎and is the assumption that mind and body are really distinct substances. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) was the first early modern philosopher to hold that a thinking-thing is entirely different form an extended thing and mind can exist without the body. Cartesian dualism, which started the famous mind-body problem of causal interaction, has been criticised by many, one of whom was a primary adherent, Baruch Spinoza (632-1677). This essay aims to explain and assess Spinoza’s criticism of Descartes substance dualism and see what Spinoza offers instead. I will begin by summarizing the views of Descartes on substance and distinctiveness of mind and body and how they interact. Then I will discuss Spinoza’s objections to Descartes views in general but give more details about the ones I believe are more important. I will finish by concluding what Spinoza actually wants out of it and what he really achieves.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Schultz, S. E., & Schultz, D. P. (2011). A history of modern psychology (10th ed.).…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Francis Bacon’s and Rene Descartes’ works share at least one common idea: there is a need to create new ways learning about the world. Bacon says that previous methods are outdates while Descartes suggests a new way of discovering the truth using doubt. Francis Bacon’s idols are idols of the tribe, den, market, and the theatre. Each of them represent a way of how an observation of a person can be corrupted by their nature, themselves, or other instances. He emphasizes that it is hard for an unprepared person to “guard themselves with all possible care against them” (Bacon 9). Nevertheless, Descartes does not take into account such factors and proposes an idea to question everything. He believes that the truth can be discover by doubt while…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The study of knowledge, or epistemology, contains theoretical methods in which information is learned. Of these methods, there are two that are most widely accepted. Rationalism and empiricism are also the most widely debated methods of knowledge. Rationalism claims that a priori processes and intuition gain knowledge. Rationalism claims that knowledge is innate; but that it varies among humans. At the other end of the spectrum, empiricism claims that knowledge is gained largely by experience, observation, and sensory perception.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I think, I am.” This is the premise that all of Rene Descartes’ beliefs and ideas are based off of. He believes these four words are the foundation for his existence and what he suggest all truth stems from. Descartes believes that the only thing he knows for certain is that he is a thing and that he thinks. He does not even accept his own body or the tangible world as he feels that these may very well be illusions. Descartes would attempt to better understand this theory by spending long hours in solitude. I will argue Rene Descartes’ attempts to isolate himself at times in order to think freely and examine his individual being proves that his beliefs directly correspond to the modern Western philosophy of this time period.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays