Preview

The Characteristics Of The Scientific Method, By David Reimer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Characteristics Of The Scientific Method, By David Reimer
The scientific method is described as “curious, skeptical, and humble.” (Meyers, 13) The definition of curiosity is defined by Merriam-Webster as “A strong desire to know or learn something.” The definition of skeptical is “not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations.” And humble defined as “having or showing a modest or low estimate of one's own importance.” When it comes to the scientific attitude, these three qualities are crucial in order to make groundbreaking and reliable discoveries. Without those three qualities, there is no maintenance of quality work and accuracy despite whatever subjects might be involved. In the case of David Reimer, the scientific attitude was not applied and a large disservice was created by the lack of …show more content…
Money's report was hugely influential, and quite understandably so. If a boy could be transformed into a girl just by having his penis removed, wearing a dress, and letting his hair grow, then sexual identity -- and the differences between the sexes -- must be primarily cultural in origin.”(MCRCAD) Without having any long-term findings done, Money printed his findings and became extremely influential. Money did not remain skeptical; publishing an unfinished study was what we now consider extremely irresponsible and hasty. Money was not curious either, jumping the gone on his research cinched his curiosity and led him to believe that he had discovered the gospel truth on gender identity. Lastly, Money was not humble with his findings. In fact, he might be considered the opposite. Publishing findings with no long term research and asserting that the decision to put Bruce into Brenda’s body was the right one was incredibly careless and rash. At the time Money put into his reports only the positive results were made clear and hid the real problems that were surfacing with …show more content…
Unfortunately, David Reimer committed suicide in 2004 at the age of 38. The traumatic experience with Money was something that haunted David until the end of his life. This is why it’s so essential to practice the scientific method of being curious, humble and skeptical. David overcame the lies that he had been told and became a step-father and a functioning man who felt better in his male body. Unfortunately, the horrific genital mutilation and unapproved use of hormones left David unable to conceive his own children. Money’s quest for fame, power, and manipulation killed the spirit and took the childhood of David Reimer. This is why the scientific method is ethical, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    David Reimer was a subject that was selected to become an experiment without anyone’s knowledge except Dr. John Money. Dr. Money was a very popular psychologist, who was working on a case on twin brothers, Brian and Bruce Reimer, to do routine circumcisions, but the procedure had gone wrong or so the parent’s had thought. He had mistakenly burnt off the penis of one of the twin brothers while doing the procedure and that’s when Dr. Money’s ulterior motive had begun. Dr. Money had a purpose since he solely believed nurture was more significant than nature in his point of view when it was related to the gender roles.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This video about Bruce/Brenda Reimer's story and Dr. Money was very interesting and sad. Originally, the traditional view of gender identity is a nature stance. It is stating basically that boys and girls are already born with innate features that make them specifically a boy or a girl. On the other hand, Dr. Money believed that boys and girls are born blank. That the environment, society or culture are the catalysts that how a girl and boys should behave. He believes the way a child is reared may influence the child's identity. He was more on the nurture scale versus…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry presents rhetorical strategies as a means to characterize scientific research. He thinks that being a “scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Scientific research can be courageous and dangerous. In science, people tend to doubt scientists because their discoveries it seems unreal. Even scientists such as Einstein probably doubted his own theory until his predictions were tested.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1965, David Reimer, an 8-month-old Canadian twin brother to Brian Reimer, was a victim of unethical psychiatric practices that lead us to understand Nature Vs. Nurture, and how both aid in the development of adulthood. Dr. John Money was first introduced to David, when physicians used an electro cautery needle instead of standard scalpel, which lead to the burning off of his reproductive organ. According to Intersex Society of North America “David’s parents agreed to have him “sex reassigned” and made into a girl via surgical, hormonal, and psychological treatments—i.e., via the system Money advocated for intersex children.” This approach has then provided the perspective in which modern countries use to assume that gender identity is…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientific research can either be skeptical or…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of the other phenomenon, or quantitatively predict the results of new observations…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. money believed that during the first two years of a child’s life that the child was natural and that it was not just your biology that decided your gender identity but also your upbringing. So these Reimer case was just the perfect to test his theory and so the Reamers’ did as the doctor in instructed and dressed him as a girl and raised him as a girl and they changed his name to Brenda. He told them they were to never tell Brenda she was born a boy or it would never work. They would visit every two years to visit and record the results. The first few years seem to be ok, Brenda seemed to be wanting girl things and everything seem to be working as dr. money said they would. At the age two her testicles were removed. And it wasn’t until Brenda was 7 years old when her mother had doubts about the progress of the gender issue. As Brenda got older she felt like she was crazy for feeling like a boy and wanting to play boy games and feeling like an outcast. As she grew older she started looking more masculine and the doctor pushed for…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Believe it or not, it was once illegal to teach the theory of evolution to children in school. A teacher in Tennessee named John Scopes had violated this law in the 1900s, which resulted in the John Scopes trial. This trial marked the shift of the beliefs of Americans from religion to science. Scientific research has been going on for decades and it has, for the most part, helped improve our lives, but it is a very tough field. In The Great Influenza, author John M. Barry used juxtaposition, listing, and structure to characterize scientific research as a challenging and uncertain field that requires a lot of courage to accept defeat, but also have the determination…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He currently serves as a professor at the prestigiuous American University (“Profile Jeffrey Reiman,” n.d.). In other words, he has no personal history of suffering of any sort like in case with David Gelernter. For him, in my opinion, it was important review of a topic that he can relate only from a purely theoretical perspective. In his article such position supported by not even one or two, but four…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Describe each step of the scientific method. Assess the role of reproducibility, collaboration, and peer review as part of scientific inquiry.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists elucidated on subjects they knew little about, as they used the “objectivity of science” to validate their drawn up conclusions, which resulted in continuous fallacies and common errors based…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Five Sexes, Revisited

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reading The Five Sexes, Revisited was about the misrepresentation of today’s two-sex system in society. The central issue Anne Fausto-Sterling addresses is that there are people born outside of dimorphism and most people do not understand this (pg. 122). The most important point or central argument is that the two-sexes, male and female should no longer be accepted. Instead, five-sexes should be accepted: male, female, “herms”, “merms”, and ferms” (pg. 121). An important fact the author makes is, “…we calculated that for every 1,000 children born, seventeen are intersexual in some form” (pg. 122). This bit of information proves that there are infants born between the sexes male and female. It is important for people to realize that mixed babies are in existence. Anne Fausto-Sterling also shares a story of a born intersexual. “Consider for instance, the life of Max Beck: Born intersexual, Max was surgically assigned as a female and consistently raised as such. Had her medical team followed her into her early twenties, they would have deemed her assignment a success because she was married to a man. Within a few years, however, Beck had come out as a butch lesbian” (pg. 124). It all comes down to society and this story proves it. If the world were more open to these sex issues, then we would not have these issues in the first place. In Max’s case, being born intersexual would not have been an issue in Max’s life. Instead, the doctors chose Max’s sexuality without any consent from Max. Another interesting fact that Anne Fausto-Sterling uses to back up her argument is “The logical structure of the commonly used terms “true hermaphrodite,” “male pseudohermaphrodite” and “female pseudohermaphrodite” indicates that only the so-called true hermaphrodite is a genuine mix of male and female…Because true hermaphrodites are rare – possibly only one in 100,000 – such…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge, the key to progress, has proven to be a human being’s most powerful and significant weapon. We gain knowledge when we put our brain to work at the problems we need to solve in life. It doesn’t matter what we are trying to accomplish, whether it be creating a new technology or learning how to put together a puzzle, the matter of fact is that both request great examination and research to resolve and learn. Scientific research is a technique used to investigate phenomena, correct previous understanding, and acquire new knowledge. Knowledge could lead us to a possible cure for cancer, an alternative for fossil fuels, and the creation of a revolutionary technology. Nevertheless, all these benefits are a reason why John M. Barry writes about scientific research with admiration, curiosity, and passion in which he blends a use of rhetorical strategies in order to give off an overall perspective of the necessity and mystery within scientific research.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays