Preview

The Characteristics Of Sacral Kingship In Ireland

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2356 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Characteristics Of Sacral Kingship In Ireland
Kinship has been around for many years and has been part of many societies since as far back as nearly the hunter gather period. Some societies today still have this monarch and kingship leading them but it is also seen that without this type of leadership societies and communities are able to run just as well without them. Countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden however still have some sort of kingship leading them. Up to the 18th century Ireland was ran by a sovereign but now is run by an elected government. These type of sacral kings were located all over Ireland some more important than others. There were different kings for each country and smaller towns inside these counties than king’s from provinces who had the most power. The …show more content…
There are many examples of sacral kings, presiding in different areas in Ireland and holding different titles and power. Ard ri is known as he kin of all provinces. He or she is superior of all the lower kings and princes of provinces. The high kings of Ireland were seen and claimed to have lordship over the whole of Ireland. This type of king was the highest grade of king as there was no body in a higher rank above them. The Irish name that is known for this type of king is “ri tuirech” meaning “king of great kings” or “provincial king”. The king a rank lower the ri tuirech is known as “ri tuatha”. This sacral king would be in charge of smaller kings within their ruling county. They would have some sort of power but no as much as the high kings of Ireland. Below these kings again there are kings of lower power known as “ri tuatha”. There as much more of these kings in Ireland over time and ruled between 150-200 kingdoms in early medieval Ireland. There is not always one kingship per country but a few can coincide throughout a county. Most people are led to believe that there is a sacral king per country but this is not the case in …show more content…
Though this article we find out how kings were selected and what characteristics and rules they should follow. Becoming a king is not destined by how much your or your family have. Wealth does not play a role in becoming a king as it is possible to be rich in these societies and have no family connection to a kinship. These sacral kings are portrayed as a prisoner to the throne and to their people. As when you become king you have to go by certain rules and have to act in a certain way that sees fit as a king. Becoming a king may be easy but this is not the case if you want to stay as a king. The installation ceremony is only the first step of becoming king as you have to live up the expectations of your people and of what a king should be. If you do not live up to these expectations and fail in any way of how a king should act or the choices you make as a king you will lose the title as king and more than likely be killed. As a king in some cases they have to abide by certain rules. For example they have to be carried everywhere, having to stay in their homes in certain time, having to wear special clothing and sometimes being prevented from talking to some people who aren’t of a certain status. In today’s world these are still how some of the royals are treated. The main reason for being a king is to separate them from everyday people. This increases the royalty of the king and stops

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The key of the development of centralized kingdoms was that the kings extended their power in more effective ways. During the High Middle Age, the kings started to had more source of power than the Lords, and the Kings used governmental institutions, marriage and alliance to extend their power. Some examples of centralized kingdoms are England, France and Spain. England started to emerge as a Kingdom in 1066 when William of Normandy arrived to the coasts of England. King Henry II had success in strengthening the power of the royal court. The royal courts stated to expand in all the territory and the local law codes were replaced for the common law. The English parliament merged as a representative government institutions. The house of Lords was formed by the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling through minor nobles such as Scrope of Bolton, Fitzhugh and Greystoke show his capacity to be a good king as he knew that his relationship with more of the major nobles was poor and that he couldn’t trust them. By ruling through minor nobles he felt more secure and could easily manipulate them to do as he wanted. If he tried to pass useful legislation, voting to give him custom duties for life to secure a steady income, whilst with the major nobles, they wouldn’t have co-operated as easily with him. So his relationship was much more productive and left him less…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unlike the early kings of England, Sparta left her Kings with limited power and restricted practise. However, they still had much of the honor and dignity traditionally associated with royalty. There were always two priests and came from the two royal families, Agaids and Eurypontids and headed the aristocracy…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Heian period of Japan the land was controlled by family clans and whoever was the most powerful family held the most importance. Within the family there is also ranks of political power branching down from the Emperor and Empress, but most of the other ranks are all related to each other through the family clan. The Emperor is the head of the family clan is said to be in that position by a heavenly right, while a regent is more of a governor addressing political issues. Both are important, but while the Emperor is the symbol of the people and their unity, the regent sparingly makes the differences in how the people get to live.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    nations by adding roads. Although, in my opinion this period of time was a time of tyranny…

    • 709 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A monarchial king gets its crown passed down by the king before him. “Powhatan was a leader who got his power from war, marriage and trade of goods” (Townsend). Powhatan was a leader who protected his tribes by going into war when there was a threat from newcomers or neighbors. A Monarchial king would do the same to protect his people from enemies. Powhatan welcomed newcomers only if the newcomers would greet him with goods and would trade while living in the same land. A monarchial kings were more aggressive towards newcomers they would go into war to set boundaries of their land that was not shareable to…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the beginning of medieval age in Europe, based on a feeble resource of data, it is believed that between 80‐90% of the economic activity was agriculture. Nearly everybody therefore, earned a living through agriculture as an economic activity. The economic structure prevailing then became known as Feudalism, a term which has come to mean, an economic system based on Lordship (ownership) of vast Land (also known as the ‘manor’ or ‘estate’), owned by a senior lord, who gave the right of cultivation (fief) to a lower rank of people called the vassals, who in return paid a stipulated amount from the harvests or from services rendered or ‐ later on ‐ through money, to the Lord of the manor. The vassals also received security from the lord of the manor. The origin of feudalism is sometimes traced back to the expansion of the Roman Empire. In Italy for instance, there were present large portions of land owned by Roman soldiers who had received the allocation of land in return for military services rendered to the Caesar. There also existed ownership of large track of land in Gaul before the Roman…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of king itself supplies the bearer with too much power for which one man can hold. "All Men are created equal." He had none that denied him of any of his wants and desires, whether personally or politically. A ruler must only be able to derive their "Powers from the Consent of the Governed," of which the king had none. Wise rulers must surround themselves with those they trust. The best rulers truly represent their people.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Tutankhamun

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Being the king of the most large and powerful empire in the ancient world also came with some perks. The dressing of Tutankhamun was a ritual event carried out in front of expert…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The King also greatly affected their legislative powers. He wouldn't let people be elected, he caused innocent people to be convicted of crimes that they didn't commit, and he even made it so laws couldn’t be passed without his consent, but when the time would come for the law to be passed, the King wouldn’t show up. He would also call the legislative bodies together when he knew that the officers couldn't show up without difficulty.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a Country to Do?

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The man who is to be king must be both loved and respected by the people. He must…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utopia Sudy Guide

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The problem is that the kings are more focused on their land and receiving more territory and wealth rather than governing their kingdom. kings and advisors are greedy and selfish and don’t show any compassion for the common people.…

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The modern political history of Ireland can be separated into two time periods. The first period is it's time spent under British rule as only one territory of the United Kingdom. The second period, which represents the beginning of the modern Irish state, took place during the early twentieth century. The road to national sovereignty was neither easy nor short as Britain was far from eager to let its dependent state go. The first organized movement towards independence occurred in 1916 when revolutionaries declared Ireland to be free from British rule on Easter of that year. Despite the ultimate failure of this initial push towards freedom Britain eventually granted the southern 26, of 38, counties dominion status in 1921. Further steps were taken in 1937 when Ireland drafted its constitution and was granted full sovereignty. The final phase in southern Ireland's independence came in 1949 when its status as a British commonwealth ended and the nation was declared a republic. However, even after disassociating itself from the United Kingdom the southern counties of Ireland wouldn't be completely satisfied as long as the remaining 6 counties that comprised Northern Ireland were still a part of Britain's empire. The predominantly protestant northern counties of Ireland have been a barrier to peace in the region from the first days of the Republic up to today. These counties are considered as a separate state but can also be considered as the same nation. This topic will be explored in more depth after the explanations of both the current Irish state as well as what can be considered the Irish nation.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Medieval Nobles

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the medieval period the most powerful people in the Western Europe were the great nobles kings, lords and the lesser nobles. They were at the top of the feudal system.Nobles had control over the knights and peasants. Kings and queens found it difficult to rule without the help of the nobles for three main reasons. Firstly they needed the force of fighting men (knights) on call if their power was threatened, Secondly they needed someone to travel their messages it was hard for rulers to make their power felt in distant parts and lastly they needed someone to look after the manor this meant hiring peasants (serfs)to farm the land. In return nobles were given a great deal of power, land, money and life of luxury.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The King had riches and luxury and a very good life. The Nobility also had a good life and had servants and wealth and were very comfortable. As you moved down, the positions had less power and land rights. As you moved up, the positions had more power and land rights.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays