Preview

The Changing State Government

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2954 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Changing State Government
The Changing Role of State Government
The American Political System
LG 113
Matthew Moe

The role of state government in the United States political system has been dynamic, complex, and hotly debated since the former British colony declared independence in 1776. Founded and developed as individual colonies, the states entered a loose union under the Articles of Confederation during the War of Independence and remained nearly autonomous until the United States Constitution was ratified in 1789. The Constitution sought to form a “more perfect union” by establishing a federal government which could “provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare” of its citizens much better than each state could on its own
…show more content…
Principally, the government would comprise of three branches—Executive, Legislative, and Judicial—each with the power the check the other two. The legislative branch was to be a bicameral house, giving equal representation to each state and its citizens, and further enshrining the separation of power as a fundamental doctrine. Article I enumerated the specific powers of the the federal government to oversee foreign policy, national defense, and interstate commerce while also stipulating that it could do all things “necessary and proper” to carry them out. The latter provision, known as the “Elastic Clause,” would later form the basis of massive federal expansion into state and local affairs ("Article I - Legislative …show more content…
While they were supplied with guarantees as to their representation in government, defense from incursion, and the “full faith and credit” of their laws by other states, they were conversely obliged to recognize the laws other states, and decisively compelled to yield to federal laws where they conflicted ("Article IV - States, Citizenship, New States"). Finally, the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights reserved the “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it” to the states and its people ("Amendment X"). Because relatively few powers were explicitly assigned to the federal government, states would ostensibly have considerable freedom in managing their jurisdictions. As history will show, this would not always be the case. Several landmark Supreme Court decisions citing key clauses have dictated the interpretation of the Constitution, and the balance of state and federal authority thereafter. The Commerce Clause (the federal government 's express power to oversee interstate commerce), the Elastic Clause (its implied power to do things necessary and proper), and the Supremacy Clause (preemption of federal over state laws) are especially significant, and continuously reappear in disputes surrounding the role of federal and state

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In addition to enumerated powers, the constitution also uses independent checks to limit federal and state power. While the constitution does not specifically list the powers of the states, it does declare that certain powers can only be exercised by congress. One of the three main congressional powers is the power to regulate commerce among the states (Mallor 61).…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of the United States can be seen over a specific time period. Between 1970 and 1930 the form of government was known as layer cake federalism or dual federalism. There were clear powers divided between the states and the centre and there was sovereignty given in equal measure to both. Between the years 1930 and 1960 the structure was known as Cooperative federalism or marble cake federalism where the state and the central government shared functions and collaborated on issues of national importance and priorities. The 1960s to 1980s were known as picket fence federalism and was characterized by high and overloaded cooperation and regulations which were not only interfering between the powers of the centre and…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Revolution In Favor Of Government”, by Max M. Edling, presents the founding period of America. Besides, it focuses on the political and historical facts of the Constitution and the American state. According to Max Edling, the Federalists tried to build a central government, which was based on the fiscal-military of Europe. So, the federal system of government was built when the Constitution was designed by Federalists with fiscal-military power. They had to build a different state, because it was hard to secure adopting the Constitution. The Constitution was designed to protect the liberties and the rights of the American citizens.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States defines a government with three branches: executive, legislative and judicial. Each branch has certain powers, but those powers are also bound by specific limits, exercised primarily in a system of checks and balances by the other branches. This concept is known as "separation of powers," according to an overview on the website of the National Conference of State Legislatures, a term coined by Charles-Louis de Secondat, an 18th-century French social and political philosopher. The legislative branch makes laws, but they must be signed by the executive to take effect, or they may be vetoed. The judicial branch rules on the laws' constitutionality. Legislators can respond by overriding a veto, changing a law or amending the Constitution.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As inevitable as the U.S. Constitution feels today as the foundation on which the United States of America and its political system are built, it was not the first document ratified by the former British colonies to establish a union. During the years of the American Revolutionary War and the years directly following it, the newly formed United States of America were essentially a collection of thirteen more or less sovereign states loosely held together in an alliance by the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (Articles of Confederation). However, as a foundation for a functioning government, the Articles of Confederation were lacking, leaving the federal government essential powerless and unable to effectively execute the few powers explicitly bestowed upon it by the Articles. Fiscal issues and rebellion threaten to tear the young nation…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American system of government following the end of the American Revolution was a disaster as far as the nation’s status as a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was nothing “unified” about the United States. The states stood in the union as individual bodies, with little to no ties to a seemingly non-existent central governing body or to the other states. This allowed the states to disregard other states’ laws and ultimately created disunion within the states. Because it has been proven that the states cannot stand alone and sufficiently govern themselves without a strong central government, the national government should be the supreme law of the land.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States (U.S.) Constitution is the source of all government powers and provides limitations on the government that protect the natural rights of U.S. citizens. Prior to its creation, the 13 original states comprising the U.S., were united under the Articles of Confederation. These articles entrusted a Confederate Congress with the authority to wage war, mediate disputes between states as well as set weights and measures. However, the Confederate Congress was completely funded by individual states, did not have the authority to raise funds itself and all decisions required a unanimous vote of approval from all states. It was far from a perfect government. These limitations along with the historical tendencies high ranking officials have toward greed and abuse of power rendered this Congress ineffective, spawning a collective desire for reform. (Whitehouse.gov, 2017) In 1787 delegates from 12 of the 13 states convened in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution. Their goals were to design a government that could provide fair treatment to its citizens, keep peace amongst the individual states as well as with outside nations, defend our country from enemies, and to set a standard for living comfortably, well, and free. To achieve this, the government was split into three separate branches and power divided amongst them.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was established on the principals of popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. Popular sovereignty allowed people to have the power to sustain the government through the representatives they elected. A limited government was set up to have tough restrictions on its powers and abilities. With the separation of powers came the development of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, which also led to the installment of the checks and balances system, keeping the powers equal. Federalism divided the power between federal and local governments. The government now had power to levy taxes, regulate trade, and raise an army. The House and Senate were home to the representation of the states, House based on population and Senate maintained equal representation. With majority vote out of both houses of representatives, plus one, the signature of the president, bills became laws. Laws were proposed by Congress or state and ratified by the states…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Once ratified, the Constitution set the basis for the government. Powers are divided between the federal government and the 50 states. The Founding Fathers knew they had to leave enough powers with the states when they were writing the Constitution. If they didn't, they knew the state legislatures would never ratify the Constitution. All states were granted the right to control certain things within their borders. They could do so as long as they did not interfere with the rights of other states or the nation.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first three articles describe each branch and what each branch is made out of. (Doc B) The federal government was split into three and that was called the seperation of powers. Since all the power isn’t just in one branch, the seperation of powers guard against tyranny. As stated by James Madision “ The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executie, and judiciary, in the same hands whether of one, a few, or many.”…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for the United States to become a successful nation after the revolutionary war the Congress had to devise a system of government that would be just and effective. First, the articles of confederation were drawn up, but they failed massively. The major reason for failure was the excessive amount of power the states had over the federal government, creating a weak central government, and obviously, the states couldn’t function as a stable group. Unlike our current government, the articles relied on solely the congress with the executive and judicial offices nonexistent. With no executive office to enforce the laws, and no judicial wing to interpret them, most of the laws congress passed were ignored, or modified by the individual states,…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ongoing debate on the division of powers between the national government and the states began with the founding of the republic in 1787 and still continues today. In 1787 the debate over the division of power began with the federalists and the anti-federalists. More recently, the Republicans started an effort to slow the growth of the federal government by returning many of the functions back to the state, called the Devolution Revolution. The U.S. Supreme court continues to make decisions that have a direct impact on the power given to the states in relation to the federal government.…

    • 870 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays