Preview

The Causes of the Second Punic War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Causes of the Second Punic War
Dating back to 509BC, two great powers of the Mediterranean - Rome and Carthage - had friendly treaties with each other. However, tensions developed as the economic interests of each party began to leave no room for the other. While Carthage was larger and richer with an excellent Navy, Rome had a strong government backed with a seemingly inexhaustible land army of citizens. In particular, conflicts occurred over a clash of economic interests. The First Punic War (also called the Sicilian War) began in 264BC as a result of both Rome and Carthage wishing to have exclusive control over Sicily. Rome managed to win a victory in the Aegates Islands after twenty three years of fighting, by working hard to match Carthage’s strong naval power. A peace was forced, with Rome deciding the terms of the treaty. However, as often happens with wars that are concluded on such harsh terms, another war was to follow in 218BC, just twenty three years after the First Punic War. That said, the treaties, while a major reason for the Second Punic War, were not the only cause.

The treaty that Rome made with Carthage was complicated, and had numerous political results. Carthage was asked to totally evacuate Sicily and the Aegadian Islands, which lay west of it, as well as the small islands that lay between Sicily and Africa. According to Wikipedia, “Perhaps the most immediate political result of the First Punic War was the downfall of Carthage 's naval power.” They also had to return all Roman prisoners of war to Rome without ransom, but make a huge payment for their own people. The Carthaginians were not permitted to attack Syracuse and her allies, and the allies of both Rome and Carthage were not allowed to make war on each other. A small group of Islands, north of Sicily – Aeolian Islands and Ustica – that had previously belonged to Carthage were to be transferred to Rome’s control. On top of this, Carthage was to pay a fine of 2200 talents over ten yearly



Bibliography: • Abbott, J. (2007), Hannibal at Saguntum, [Online book]. Available: http://www.mainlesson.com/display.php?author=abbott&book=hannibal&story=saguntum. Accessed on 20.10.07. • Heaton, C. (2003) Second Punic War. [Online]. Available: http://www.unrv.com/empire/second-punic-war.php Accessed on 20.10.07. • J, R. (2002) Second Punic War 218 – 201BC [Online]. Available: http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/wars_punic2.html Accessed on 20.10.07. • Le Glay, M; Jean-Louis Voisin; Yann Le Bohec. (1996). A History of Rome. Blackwell Publishers Ltd: America. • Lendering, J. (2007), Hannibal Barca, [Online]. Available: http://www.livius.org/ha-hd/hannibal/hannibal.html . Accessed on 20.10.07. • Morey, C.M. (1901) Outlines of Roman History ~ Chapter XV [Online Book] Available: http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey15.html Accessed on 20.10.07. Published as a book by: American Book Company: New York. • Polybius, The Histories of Polybius,, (trans. Evelyn S. Shuckburgh in 1889) Macmillan: London. [Also available online at: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/polybius-hannibal.html Accessed on 10.11.07]. • Roebuck, C. (1996) The World Of Ancient Times. Charles Scribner’s Sons: America. • Rogers, N. (2006) Roman Empire. Anness Publishing Ltd: London. • Various Authors (2007). The First Punic War, [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Punic_War Accessed on 20.10.07.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Salmon, E. T. (1968). A history of the Roman world: From 30 B.C. to A.D. 138. London: Routledge.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 3rd Punic War

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    History is built up upon many turning points. A turning point is an idea, event, or action that directly or indirectly caused a change. It can cause a change in culture, society, economy, government etc. A great example of a turning point in history is the American Revolution.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World History

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    —William Stearns Davis, ed., Readings in Ancient History: Illustrative Extracts from the Sources, 2 Vols. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1912-13), Vol. II: Rome and the West, pp. 365-367…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shelton, Jo-Ann. As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hasdrubal: Carthaginian general who lost the 3rd Punic War to Scipio Aemilianus at the Siege of Carthage in 146 BCE.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The responsibility for the Punic wars greatly shifts from one to the next as both Rome and Carthage were Superpowers in their own right and it was inevitable that there would be a collision and subsequent reaction from any action taken.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of 2nd Punic War

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Punic war “was the greatest and most dangerous one Rome was compelled to fight on their way to the conquest of the Mediterranean.” With 17 years of battle causing heavy casualties to be suffered on both sides, the Second Punic War has proven to be an important time period in the Roman and Carthaginian empires. For Rome, the end of the war meant “the defection of most Southern Italy” (Kagan 232, 1995) and many economic problems. For Carthage this meant the end of their rise to power, and the realization that the idea of Mediterranean control being based in Africa rather than Europe was no longer a possibility (Kagan 233, 1995). Both empires had a lot at stake upon entering the war, but as will be discussed, many historians believe that eventual conflict was inevitable. Past grievances and battles pitted the Romans and Carthaginians against one another ultimately leading to the Second Punic War and the resulting downfall of Carthage.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lendering, Jona, “The Senate”, Livius Articles on Ancient History (available from http://www.livius.org/se-sg/senate/senator.html, accessed on 7/02/2012)…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: The History of Rome by Titus Livius. Translated from the Original with Notes and Illustrations by George Baker, A.M.. First American, from the Last London Edition, in Six Volumes (New York: Peter A. Mesier et al., 1823). Retrieved from: http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=170&Itemid=27…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 264 B.C., Rome became involved in what later became the Punic Wars. The Greek Colony of Messina (sometimes known as Messana) requested help from Rome when King Hiero from Syracuse invaded. Though this first war just begun as a skirmish between Messina and other Carthaginians, once Rome had expelled Hiero it escalated into a full-blown battle, with Rome capturing Messina and adding it to its ever-expanding republic. From 262-261 B.C., Rome continued to press on through Sicily, capturing Agrigentum after a long siege. This battle of Agrigentum was a big turning point, as it was the first major military battle in these wars. Throughout this first Punic War, Rome realized what a disadvantage it was at by not having a suitable navy to match that of Carthage. As a result of this, in 260 B.C. the Roman senate made the big decision to build a fleet. At the end of the war in 241 B.C., Rome made Carthage sign a treaty promising that Carthage would give up Sicily and that it would pay for Rome’s war…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rome a symbol of strength, empowerment and prosperity for many, leaving no doubt in modern historians thoughts that this utopia was one of the most prominent of the ancient era’s. One dynasty within this epoch stands out, as being one of the most provocative and influential was the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This period was introduced with the instigation of the emperor Julio Augustus, known as one of the most appreciated emperors in Roman history. After Augustus came the rulers Tiberius, Gaius Germanicus (Caligula), Claudius and Nero. With every new ruler the amount of power and wealth in the city swelled, some even say that it was the golden age of Roman literature and arts. Each of these power broker’s have one person in common, apart from imperial extravagance and notoriety, they all have felt the sting of Julia Agrippina’s manipulative powers (The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2013). When studying Agrippina it is found that many of the sources do not retain a sympathetic view of the During the Julio-Claudian era Agrippina the younger only retained her power through the manipulation of her son, husband and peers. By doing this she made herself on the most powerful women in Rome.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hannibal’s influence came as a result of his involvement in the Punic Wars. The question of whether the Second Punic War was of Hannibal’s making is debated greatly amongst modern historians but regardless, it is unlikely it would have taken the course it did without Hannibal as the predominant leader of the Carthaginian forces. Both Polybius and Livy described Hannibal making an oath to his father at the age of nine that he would never become a friend of Rome. With this and his defiance of Rome by attacking Saguntum as evidence, many modern scholars have attributed the outbreak of war in 218 directly to Hannibal. Bagnall for example, suggests that “Hannibal was bent on war and Rome was not loathe to accept the challenge” (Bagnall, 1999) whilst Caven writes, “Hannibal was an impetuous young man in whom the principal driving force was a burning desire for military glory” (Caven, 1992). This modern interpretation of ancient sources would suggest a key impact of Hannibal on his time: the outbreak of the Second Punic War. Whilst numerous historians refute this being the main cause of the war, with Polybius for example suggesting that it was the seizure of Corsica/Sardinia or Scullard suggesting that “The Second Punic War was largely of…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second Punic war was battle between carthage , Hannibal and Rome. The war saw massive destruction of Roman army in the hands of a great commandant Hannibal. He Hannibal had early Victory over the Rome, which saw destruction of many Romans. This does not deter Romans as they regrouped and raised new armies. Hannibal destroyed several thousands of Roman army, but the Romans were still courageous and ready to defend their Fatherland. At the battle…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carthage and Rome were both very powerful nations for the time. Carthage started as a seaport town at the northern point of Africa, just below Sicily and south of Rome. Eventually their nation grew and expanded from Africa into the western side of Sicily in hopes of conquest, but the King of Syracuse there resisted them until Rome sided with some traitorous mercenaries that broke ranks from his military and decided to rebel[ CITATION Mor01 \l 1033 ]. Those mercenaries took over a city to the east and held it hostage in protest to the king. When the king began attacking them, they asked for the help of Rome. Rome reluctantly chose to help these mercenaries and this made the King mad. This king of Syracuse, Sicily resorted to siding with…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays