Preview

The Balance Of Honor Over Ambition In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Balance Of Honor Over Ambition In Julius Caesar
Honor over Ambition

Throughout history the balance between honor and ambition has been tilted in one way or another. Someone’s ambition can get in the way of their honor and result in dishonorable actions and negative societal consequences. However sometimes a dishonorable act can be done for honorable reasons, for the greater good of society. This is the case in Marcus Brutus taking part in Julius Caesar’s murder, Oskar Schindler deceiving the Nazi, and Sir Nicholas Winton forging legal documents

Doing something for the greater good can sometimes lead to putting your honor and morals aside to do what is best for society as a whole. As was the case in Marcus Brutus, who believed Caesar’s climb in the political ladder could only lead to
…show more content…
“He told Nazi officials that there was an increasing amount of work to get done. Thus, he was able to get relatives of his Jewish workers sent to the plant, avoiding their deportation and death at Auschwitz.” (“Oskar Schindler”). Mr.Schindler risked own safety by lying to Nazis and keeping false records to keep as many Jews as he could including children and the elderly as the Nazis considered them useless as workers, “Old people were recorded as being 20 years younger; children were being listed as adults. Lawyers, doctors, and engineers were being registered as metal workers, mechanics, and draughtsmen- as trades considered essential to war production” (“Oskar Schindler”).His heroic efforts in saving men and women, young and old have been seen as questionable for benefiting from slave labour as claimed by his wife, “[Schindler] worked to keep the Jews out of concentration camps because he was greedy and needed their cheap labor.” (“Oskar Schindler”). However, many of the people Mr.Schindler saved say his reasons didn’t matter and in Oskar Schindler’s own words, “I knew the people who worked for me. When you know people, you have to behave towards them like human beings.”(“Oskar Schindler”). Whether or not Oskar Schindler saved the at least 1,100 jews because he needed their labor or because he genuinely cared is uncertain but the outcome is a clearly heroic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Oskar Schindler was a man who lived in Krakow, Poland throughout the period of the Holocaust and World War II. During the Holocaust, Oskar Schindler managed to help over one thousand Jewish people escape from a deadly persecution. Schindler accomplished something that was socially unacceptable at the time; he prevailed against a system that showed no weakness. Schindler manipulated hundreds of men and women during the Holocaust so that he may do the unthinkable, and saved those he should most certainly despise. Oskar Schindler was able to complete all that he did because of his personal background.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As he had done twice before, Schindler pulled some strings at the top and got permission from German officials to take his workers to the nearby station to rescue the stranded. Once at the station, they forced the doors open to the rail car and removed some 100 half frozen Jews. Schindler's wife Emile did her best to nurse the ill back to health. Those that did not survive were given a proper Jewish burial paid for by Schindler (Paldiel, 1982). Schindler spent infinite amounts of money not only paying for the upkeep of his workers, but paying the government. Schindler was arrested two times while trying to complete his saving operations. Each time, though, he found a new excuse, or paid a little more money. He risked his life, as well as his family's lives, to save a race of people he never even…

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schindler is mainly known for saving Jews by employing them in his factory; however, he used many more strategies to do so. Schindler would make the Nazi officers who would inspect his factory drunk, so they would not see all of Schindler’s workers fumbling while they work. He also made a list, “Schindler’s List”, of people he would buy from concentration camps to work at his factory. This list included his former workers as well as a number of others. When Schindler and Emilie brought new workers into the factory, they nursed them until they were healthy again. Schindler maintained a special relationship with his workers, so they were called “Schindlerjuden” (Schindler Jews). By the end of the war, Schindler was penniless; he had spent all of his money to protect his workers. All of these contributions that Oskar Schindler made has a great effect on American history. Schindler not only saved people’s lives, but he also showed people to use what you have for the benefit of others. Many people look up to Schindler for his sacrifices and his contribution to the end of World War II and the freedom of hundreds of Jewish…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brutus was a man of honor. His nobility shaped every decision he made. Renown for his nobility, Antony labeled him as “the noblest Roman of them all.” Out of all the conspirators, Brutus was the only Roman conspirator to die in honor for Rome. Meanwhile, the others did it for power and complacency, Brutus knew that Caesar was a big threat to Rome and was scared that once Caesar was crowned, Rome would fall.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen L. Carter is an American law professor, social-policy writer, columnist, and bestselling author. Carter graduated from several Ivy league schools earning eight honorary degrees. In 1996, Stephen L. Carter wrote a book length meditation on his idea of what integrity means. His purpose of “The Rules about the Rules” regards the current state of public integrity. Although many Americans in today’s society do not know right from wrong, I agree with Carter’s response to what integrity really means.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue’s significance in society has changed over time and its relevance can be used to contrast differing social and cultural contexts. The prescribed non-fiction text, “The Prince,” written by Niccolo Machiavelli in 1532, is a didactic explanation of the political struggles of Renaissance Italy. Similarly, William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar,” composed in 1599, depicts the historical events surrounding Julius Caesar’s assassination. The ideas of manipulation and fate versus free will are presented through literary devices in “The Prince” and dramatised staging features in Shakespeare’s play. While virtue is presented as a key theme in both texts, its portrayal differs due to the context in which it was set or written.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In both Animal Farm by George Orwell and The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, having an ambitious leader leads to many consequences. The word ambition means to have or show a strong desire and determination to succeed. Leaders such as Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, and Napoleon have ambition that makes them seem prepared for anything. This makes the people and animals follow them blindly believing they are helping the cause but in reality, they’re only helping their leader. Being ambitious can be both helpful and harmful but the consequences can be fatal.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics comes after honor since an individual who lacks honor lacks moral compass and there is no way such individuals can turn to be ethical (Shafritz, Russell and Borick 200). In any case, honor goes to the heart of public affairs. It is from the olden days when only those individuals regarded as honorable could be relied on and trusted with public affairs. Donald Rumsfeld and Robert S. McNamara present obvious icons of government officials undergoing ethical dilemma. The problem in the parallel bloody hands case is the issue of loyalty and ethics. The main question is whether the officials of the government must be loyal towards citizens or administration (Shafritz, Russell and Borick 195). The parallel bloody hands case finds answers to whether loyalty towards the President, Mayor, or Governor must be lesser or greater than the loyalty towards the overall interests of the citizens.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important for people to maintain their integrity. Without integrity the world would be a dishonest place, where people would be going out to get everything they can any way they can. Just like Ann and Thomas Putnam in The Crucible. They were condemning…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honorable or not? Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare was a tragedy consisting many events. The tragedy of Julius Caesar began in Rome when the people of Rome are taking a holiday to celebrate the triumphant return of Julius Caesar. Two tribunes’ names Marullis and Flavious try to shame the people of Rome for their fickle behavior for one minute praising Pompey and now praising Caesar. Julius Caesar is a highly successful leader of Rome whose popularity seems to model a dictatorship. Although Caesar is loved and supported by the citizens some begin to grow worry of his increase in power through out Rome. Soon these worried citizens conspire to assassinate Caesar before he becomes king thus returning their republic government into a monarchy. These worried citizens consisted of two main characters Brutus and Cassius. Brutus ends up joining this conspiracy in killing Caesar because he strongly believes in keeping Rome a government ruled by the people. In addition to that, during the celebration, of Caesar is warned by the Soothsayer to “beware the Ides of March” The next…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has goals. Some people believe in order to attain a certain goal that it is acceptable to do things that are immoral. This may cause one to wonder if the actions taken to reach such a goal will be worth it. I am going to discuss some different situations that may or may not have a worthy ending, including any means it might take to reach goals such as gaining power, maintaining authority and gaining a title. I’ll also go over what some of the difficulties are in using tactics that may be categorized as unfair or even bad. Are immoral actions ever an acceptable way to achieve a goal?…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I choose to follow the tenets of virtue theory, I will need to consider whether lying is “...good on the basis of the character trait or virtue that the act evidences” (Geuras and Garofalo, 2011, 59). My determination is that lying is not good; it manifests a lack of integrity and weakness of character. If I choose to lie and support Edward’s request, then I will be admitting that I am not a man of honor, and that I am unworthy of commanding respect. This will tarnish my reputation among my family, friends, and associates. I will be judged unworthy to hold positions of responsibility and will be scorned for my behavior. I would never trust a man who lies, and I expect most responsible members of society feel the same. However, if I choose to be honest in this situation, I will maintain my reputation and will be considered a man of honor. This will serve me well in all my future dealings with…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our modern approach to justice in decision making is said to be missing the inherited sense of what justice is. Virtues are said to be qualities of character which help us make sound judgements. The tradition of virtues, which we inherited through scripture and philosophy, included the cardinal virtues of courage, temperance, prudence and justice. These cardinal virtues are said to have to be used together in the right balance, not in isolation. (Messer, 2006)…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics