Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Atomic Bomb

Better Essays
1387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Atomic Bomb
The Atomic Bomb: Beneficial or Disastrous?
Was dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II the most affective action that the United States could have taken? In the American eyes it was a good punishment on Japan in response to the Pearl Harbor attacks on December 7, 1941. The way the Japanese leaders launched the fighter planes that came in a destroyed many U.S. naval ships and took thousands lives, including soldiers and innocent bystanders, was a completely immoral action because Japan had hinted interest in keeping the peace with the United States. Pearl Harbor at the time was not in a high alert situation because the U.S. was under the impression that Japan would attack do to them being interested in keeping peace. In fact the U.S. soldiers were not manning anti-aircraft guns or any other defensive type weapons at the time prior to the attacks. The U.S. naval and air strength in the pacific were crippled by the attack, thus making the attack from Japan successful. On December 8, 1941 the United States Congress declared war on Japan in response to the attack on Pearl Harbor. Not everyone wanted to enter this war. When I say everyone I only mean one. Representative Jeannette Rankin of Montana was the only vote against declaring war on Japan. Rankin had also voted against going into World War 1 (Anderson). The attack on Pearl Harbor sparked the United States to take drastic measures to ensure victory over Japan in order to have the peace of mind and to insure the safety of innocent Americans. On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the atomic bomb named “Little Boy” on Hiroshima, Japan. Three days later, on August 9, 1945, the United States dropped the second atomic bomb name “Fat Man” on Nagasaki, Japan. On August 14, 1945 Japan agreed to an unconditional surrender and then on September 2, 1945, Japan formally surrendered and World War II was finally over (1942). Although the war was finally over there were a couple consequences to the devastation which including innocent lives being lost to the initial blast from the bomb and extreme radiation exposure, and the argument of whether or not dropping the atomic bomb was a justified decision in sealing the victory with Japan. The droppings of the atomic bombs gave Japan a scar that will never under any circumstance completely heal. Although they can cover it, up the damage has already been done. The United States can not just rewind time and change what had happened. If they could, then history would change entirely. If that were the case, who knows what the outcome of World War II would have been. If the war had not ended that day the death toll could have possibly rose to unimaginable numbers. Together, Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a death toll of 210,000 people. Other than the deaths, civilians who survived the actual bomb blast suffered from extreme radiation. Out of 280,000 survivors only forty-five percent were alive and they were tested 60 years later for long term effects to the radiation exposure. The findings were that survivors of the radiation exposure were more at risk for long-term risks of cancer which would linger with the person for their lifetime. The exposure also held their unborn children at risk of not being capable of growing as big and not having the intelligence as children that were not exposed to the atomic bomb radiation. Unborn babies were born with mental retardations and malformations because of the mother being exposed the huge amounts of radiation during her pregnancy. Symptoms of survivors were typically headaches, dizziness, and liver malfunction and nutritional issues. Survivors who were badly burnt almost had no chance of survival. Japan did not have enough supplies and the sophisticated equipment during this time to help heal all of the victims with extreme burns. In response, the nurses would help the ones that could be healed and just let the people who were to severely burnt die a slow and painful death. It had to be very heart breaking to see people all around you suffering and not having the ability to help them. Today Hiroshima has a population of 1.1 million citizens and has grown to be a very plentiful and pleasant place to live. However, the scars of August 6, 1945 will always linger in the back of the Japanese citizens minds (Lynzy). Dropping the atomic bomb was a defense mechanism of the U.S. to avoid having to go into Japan and kill more people than necessary. But was this action truly justified in order to persuade Japan to surrender? In the American eyes at the time it was the best move possible to ensure that the U.S. equaled the playing field after the attacks on Pearl Harbor. The attacks on Pearl Harbor put hate in American eyes because it was a secret planned attack that no one saw coming. The U.S. citizens thought that Japan was keeping peace with the United States. After the attacks on Pearl Harbor, the view and opinion on Japan changed drastically within America. To the mid 1960’s, the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan was considered the best choice that the U.S. could have chosen to end the war sooner. The U.S. had a code breaking operation called “Magic” which deciphered millions of messages from the Japanese. The messages that were being sent showed no interest in Japan unconditionally surrendering anytime soon. During the summer of 1945, Japan was trying to make a deal with Russia, and the Japanese military leaders wanted a deal to keep the regime that started the war in power. Japan had actually been waiting on the U.S. to land in their country. Japan had been hiding over 12,000 aircrafts to use against the U.S. After the bombings there was a post war estimate of Japanese land defense and the ratio of Japanese defense to the U.S. was 3:2. The Japanese were also training civilians and children to attack U.S. soldiers. So if the U.S. had invaded Japan, innocents would have been killed regardless. It is hard to fight if you do not know who your enemy is. The estimation of monthly Japanese deaths if the war would have continued would have ranged from 250,000 to 400,000 people. The numbers were so high that the decision to drop the atomic bomb was that much easier to make. The death numbers from the atomic bomb was significantly much lower than that of the estimated monthly toll if the war continued (Palmer). In conclusion, the purpose of dropping of the atomic bomb was to end World War II sooner and minimized the amount of people being killed that had no part in the war. There are definitely positives and negatives to the brutal warfare and the way it ended. In my eyes the positives out weigh the negatives because the death toll if the U.S. entered Japan would have been much larger then the bombing itself. Pearl Harbor was a big dampener on the U.S. and the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a dampener on Japan. The atomic bomb was not a way to get even but a way to end the war with much less casualties.

Works Cited
1942, April. "World War II: Timeline." United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 07 Feb. 2012.<http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007306>.
Anderson, Erik. "Pearl Harbor - The Bombing." Erik Anderson [.net]. 1999. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. <http://www.erikanderson.net/pearlharbor/facts.html>.
Burr, William. "The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II: A Collection of Primary Sources." The George Washington University. William Burr, 27 Apr. 2007. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. <http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/index.htm>.
Lynzy. "Hiroshima Bombing Affects." Lynzy on HubPages. Lynzy, 2007. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. <http://lynzy.hubpages.com/hub/Hiroshima_Bombing_Affects>.
Palmer, Gary. "Was Using the A-Bomb Justified." Http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1459018/posts. SupreesedNews.com, 7 Aug. 2005. Web. 7 Feb. 2012.

Cited: 1942, April. "World War II: Timeline." United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 6 Jan. 2011. Web. 07 Feb. 2012.&lt;http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007306&gt;. Anderson, Erik. "Pearl Harbor - The Bombing." Erik Anderson [.net]. 1999. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. &lt;http://www.erikanderson.net/pearlharbor/facts.html&gt;. Burr, William. "The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II: A Collection of Primary Sources." The George Washington University. William Burr, 27 Apr. 2007. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. &lt;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/index.htm&gt;. Lynzy. "Hiroshima Bombing Affects." Lynzy on HubPages. Lynzy, 2007. Web. 07 Feb. 2012. &lt;http://lynzy.hubpages.com/hub/Hiroshima_Bombing_Affects&gt;. Palmer, Gary. "Was Using the A-Bomb Justified." Http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1459018/posts. SupreesedNews.com, 7 Aug. 2005. Web. 7 Feb. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    World War II is possibly the most significant period of the 20th century. Indeed, this brought development in technologies, the end of European colonialism mostly in Africa and Asia, the woman’s right and civil rights movements in the US. Mainly, the fighters were the Allied (to be continued!) The allies were the winners; indeed, they brought to an end to this war by dropping the atomic bomb in two Japanese cities (World War II, Historynet). In the following paragraph, we will understand the historic context which has led to this event.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we look back on this historical event, many would argue if dropping the atomic bomb was the right choice. Strategically and politically, Truman was justified in dropping the bomb, but morally it wasn’t the right decision. America didn’t enter the war until December 7th, 1941, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The US had been trying to stay out, but many knew their entrance…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Long, D (unknown date of creation), Hiroshima: Who disagreed with the Atomic Bombing? (online), retrieved August 31, 2012 from http://www.doug-long.com/quotes.htm…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki marked the end to the world's largest armed conflict. Many debates have surfaced over the ethics of such an attack. The bomb itself caused massive amounts of casualties while the unknown effects of radiation caused many more deaths amongst the survivors of the blast. Despite the ghastly effects of such a weapon, it offered the best choice for a quick and easy defeat of Japan. President Truman, who authorized the use of the atomic bomb, made a wise decision under the circumstances of the war. The Japanese refusal to surrender, the massive amount of allied casualties involved in invading the Japanese mainland and the ineffectuality of a military blockade enforcing Japan to surrender made the bomb a necessary last resort.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pearl Harbor Attack

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Modern History Sourcebook: Pearl Harbour Attack Documents, 1941. (n.d.). FORDHAM.EDU. Retrieved June 25, 2013, from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1941PEARL.html…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fogelman, Edwin. 1964. Hiroshima: the decision to use the A-bomb. New York Charles Scribner Print.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask "Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?" and more importantly "Why was the decision to use the bomb made?" Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manti Te’o once said “Things happen. And good things happen, and bad things happen. And I'm a person - I'm a believer that everything happens for a reason”. When president Truman and his advisors made the decision to drop the atomic bomb, they thought it would end the war. The dropping of the atomic atomic bomb had many successful tactics. It created great peace for the US from the fact that it ended total war. After the US had lost millions to the war, it was ready to make a change to end all war. Good things did come from the atomic bomb, like the fact that it ended World War II.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of people residing in the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, were citizens- not soldiers who were at war with the United States. Bill Dietrich, a Seattle Times staff reporter says “The two cities were of limited military value. Civilians outnumbered troops in Hiroshima five or six to one..” (Dietrich, 12). Despite this, many, including US president Truman, argue that because of the dropping of the bombs, more lives ending up being saved overall. The article “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” from USHistory.org states that “Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well..” (12). Though, with World War II already nearing its end and indications of surrender by the Japanese, this claim is more than unlikely to be true. If a different decision or approach would have been made by the US, more lives, both American and Japanese, would have been saved and there could have been a less controversial ending to the…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    London, Tuesday, May 1 1945. Holocaust Education and Archive Research team. Web. 27 February 2013.…

    • 2953 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States suddenly attacked on December 7, 1941, the event known as “Pearl Harbor” by Japanese air pilots. However, this is not the boiling point and utmost decisive conflict by either side. This initiated conflict between these two countries became a gradually increasing statistic of death, and these Japanese soldiers would rather suicide than face dishonored by unnatural demise, U.S. forces had difficulty in terrain taking an expense on casualty figures. Although, President Roosevelt at the time, began a secret plan called the “Manhattan project,” which would become the most pivotal dangerous weapon on earth and become the saving grace of the war? What were the leading factors in the United States dropping the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Japan? The U.S. made its decision, these causing factors; to end the war quickly as possible, they lived by the Bushido code, the "Pacific Theater of Operations" was grueling and an insurmountable mountain to climb in duration and endurance, wanted to punish Japan for Pearl Harbor, and send a political message to Russia as an imitation tactic.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact of the atomic bomb on Japan is a reason why the bomb was significant because they were the trial run. The atomic bomb was powerful and caused suffering to thousands of people. The first bomb (which was dropped in Hiroshima) caused 40,000 people to die instantly. When the second bomb dropped (in Nagasaki) 80,000 people died instantly. In addition to this, another 187,747 died in casualties including radiation. Japan was used as the ‘guinea pig’ for the atomic bombs, but thousands of civilians were killed or affected by it. However, the two cities that were bombed, were civilian based, not army based cities. These two cities wouldn’t have gained anything from the war as they were not army based. If America had bombed an army base that would have been justified, as revenge for Pearl Harbour. If they had given Japan a warning that they were going to be bombed they could have negotiated about it, but because they were never given a chance to surrender or strike a deal, it became unfair to the Japanese civilians.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays