Preview

Terrorist Interrogation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terrorist Interrogation
A description of the issue:
The Bush administration has proposed exempting employees of the Central Intelligence Agency from a legislative measure endorsed by 90 members of the Senate that would bar cruel and degrading treatment of any prisoners in U.S. custody. The Bush administration believes that interrogators are acting lawfully, gaining useful information to help win the war against al Qaeda and will continue to press detainees for leads.
The controversial interrogation technique known as water boarding, in which a suspect has water poured over his mouth and nose to stimulate a drowning reflex, has been banned by CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden. Human rights groups and a number of leading U.S. officials have branded the practice of water boarding as "torture", because it amounted to a "mock execution." While new legislation, reportedly, gave the CIA the leeway to use water boarding, current and former CIA officials have decided to take it off the list of about six "enhanced interrogation techniques."

A summary of the Bush Administration’s position on the issue:
After months of consultation among federal authorities and wrangling with Congress, President Bush signed an executive order spelling out legal standards for the detention and interrogation of suspected terrorists held by the CIA. The order prohibits cruel and inhuman treatment, including humiliation or denigration of religious beliefs. The order requires that detainees are provided with the basics of life, food and water, and it prohibits subjecting them to extreme heat or cold. The order, for the first time, bars "acts of violence serious enough to be considered comparable to murder, torture, mutilation, and cruel and inhuman treatment." The order was developed under the auspices of the president’s National Security Council, with several agencies involved.

An argument from an interest group supporting the Administration’s position:
‘American Daughter’ is a group that strongly



Cited: “Senate Approves Terror Detainee Bill; House Moves on Surveillance Bill.” September 29, 2006. <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,216458,00.html> “Letter to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.” February 22, 2007.< http://www.uusc.org/programs/STOP/positionletter.html> “Stop the ACLU.” November 16, 2006. <http://www.americandaughter.com/index.html?http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?p=968> “It’s About Time.” October 17, 2006. <http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/category/aclu/> Ginbar, Yuval. Why Not Torture Terrorists? Moral, Practical and Legal Aspects of the "Ticking Bomb" Justification for Torture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Fesperman, Dan. The Prisoner of Guantanamo. New York: Knopf Publishing Group, 2007.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has failed to identify any particular “authorized investigation”. While I believe the fight against terrorism is an important fight to fight, simply using that as a reason to collect this data is too broad. Additionally, I support Judge Lynch’s finding that Congress meant to exclude this broad collection of data, and that if he agreed with the government it would cause a reading out of the term “authorized investigation”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heymann vs. Dershowitz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Professor Heymann’s experience as a former attorney general in Clinton’s administration has provided him with a closer look on the government policies about interrogation and torture; therefore, he has built up his own opinion on whether torture should be allowed as a method for extracting information. According to his observations, torture should not be authorized, because it is a “bad and dangerous idea that can easily sound plausible”. (174)…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.N defines torture as a way people get answers from detainees. The CIA would use harmful techniques to figure out what someone did, and how they did it (“5 Interrogation Methods”). One of the techniques used to get out answers was waterboarding. People are put on the ground or anywhere and they have a towel on their face. The prison guard would pour the water all over the other person's face to imitate drowning (“5 Interrogation Methods”). Having said this, because of the interrogation less people have been attacked and the CIA has found more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eifs Pros And Cons

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In addition to the overwhelming public support for the use of EITs, the same ABC News survey found that 53% of Americans believe that the interrogation techniques used by the CIA produced important information for the United States fight against terror, and indeed they were correct. Of the 119 individuals detained after the 9/11 and subjected to EITs only 26 did not provide actionable intelligence or were “wrongfully held” (Ashkenas). In addition, only 3 detainees were subjected to the harshest technique of waterboarding. Waterboarding is defined by the BBC…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it,” the president said in a statement. “I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legality of Bush’s M.O. immediately became the subject of debate upon its publication. For example, the president argues that he is fully authorized to enforce the use of military tribunals based on the historical precedents set in place by former presidents. He also argues that he is permitted to establish tribunals based on his declaration of “a national emergency on September 14, 2001.” The M.O. order states that “this emergency constitutes an urgent and compelling government interest, and that issuance of this order is necessary to meet the emergency.” By declaring a state of national emergency, Bush suggests that tribunals are now a matter of “military necessity.” Those subject to the order are defined in subsection 2(a)(1) as someone who “is or was a member of the organization known as al Qaeda,” as well as someone who meets the following criteria:…

    • 14798 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    McKenna, George, and Stanley Feingold. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Political Issues. Dubuque, IA: McGraw Hill, 2007. Print.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Waterboarding is a torture technique used by military personnel to retrieve information, or at least attempt, from terrorist during investigations. In recent events Donald Trump has stated “…it actually works…” and it’s time to “…fight fire with fire.”(“Donald Trump says torture ‘absolutely works’—but does it?) However, despite the theory that it works, many other factors apply to the reasoning of why it should not be used. Waterboarding is a torturous, unethical, murderous method of interrogation and should be illegal.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Enhanced interrogation”, as torture has been termed by the George W. Bush administration, may not work. The Central Intelligence Agency has confirmed this (Constantini). Retired Army lieutenant general Harry Soyster, said waterboarding produces “bad intelligence”. “It ruins the subject, makes them useless for further interrogation. And it damages our credibility around the world." Soyster a was former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. President Barack Obama banned waterboarding, by executive order, in 2009 (“Torture”).…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified by the possibility of preserving the lives of many? Torture is the used as a weapon, but in reality does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives are for using torture, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues or flaws with the entire process of torture.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply, this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances, a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary, torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arab and Muslim Americans

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * The Anti-Terrorism Act and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 – This created “designations” of foreign terrorist organizations and has since been largely enforced against Middle Eastern aliens. This law was passed amid much criticism by civil liberties organizations, law professors, and constitutional rights advocates as “one of the worst assaults on the constitution in decades.” President Bush and many congressmen have candidly objected to the “secret evidence” provision of the Act as an instrument of “profiling”. (Chicago Tribune[submission to the State Advisory Committee, The United States Commission On Civil Rights], March 29, 2002)…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays