Terrorist

The Terrorist’s Revolution What causes a Terrorist to be labeled a Revolutionist or a Revolutionist labeled a Terrorist. Today’s society usually uses the terms interchangeably; when one begins to talk of revolution, they are normally labeled as a terrorist. A terrorist is normally labeled a terrorist by their enemy, but a hero by the people they fight for. Is it possible that a person who has been labeled as a Terrorist to actually have good intentions for those he fights for? Is it possible they are labeled a Terrorist only due to the fact they are fighting a revolution? A Terrorist corresponds with a Revolutionist, because a Revolutionist is someone who fights for a belief and in war terror is always there. A terrorist is a person who advocates the use of fear or terror as methods of war. (Terrorist, n.) This definition is not entirely true, because there have been people labeled as terrorist who were not advocating fear. They were labeled this by the entity they were standing up to. “Does the fact that one side's "terrorist" is usually another's "freedom fighter" mean that there is no possibility of agreeing on ethical norms applicable to armed conflicts between governments and their opponents? (Goertzel.) In the case of this quotation by Goertzel, would not both sides be considered terrorists by the other, yet be considered heroes by their own? There have been many people throughout the ages who were labeled as terrorist or bad guys who ended up fighting for those people who cannot stand up for themselves. The media has the bad habit of mislabeling people as terrorist. They decide to label anyone who is a little radical as a terrorist. If Gandhi was alive today and repeated his actions, more than likely he would be labeled as a terrorist by Britain even though he is fighting for human rights. A revolutionist is someone who advocates or takes part in a revolution. (Revolutionist, n.) A revolutionary normally is a person who has a belief or idea that