Synthesis Essay: Is Science Ever Reliable?

a) I definately agree with this statement and how science is ever changing. The scientific method begins by asking a question about something. After asking a question the next step is to form a hypothesis or educated guess. A repeatable expieriment is then created to test said hypothesis, and a large amount of data is collected. Data collection then leads Scientits to analyze the data and come up with a conclusion to see if the hypothesis was proven correct or incoreect. If the hypothesis is proven in correct more tests and questions must then be asked. Science is great in the fact that it is not concrete and changes when new information is gathered. Instead of condeming new thoughts that could oppose a theory Science accepts these oppositions and builds off of past failures. Failure is not a sign of defeat in the eyes of Sciecne but rather a victory because we now know something is false and are on the right track to discovering something we couldn't explain.

B) The scientific theory only gets stronger by accepting new data. When we find out something is wrong we are one step closer to finding out what is right. If science didn't accept new data it would become
Science is reliable because it can change anytime something has been disproven. Once something has been disproven a scientits must formulate a new hypothesis and a new experiment to collect more data inorder to find more information. Some skeptics believe that science is not reliable because it changes so much but in fact that is what makes sciecne more credible. Science is reliable because it can change and doesn't just accept the "facts" and can ask new questions at any time. Allowing people to disprove scientific theories only strengthens science and provides the most up to date information on what has been observed, or the next theory of a new question that has been