David Mamet’s, The Duck Variations, provides a metaphor for nearly every aspect of human existence. The conversation between Emil and George, two old men on a park bench included topics ranging from air pollution to the ancient Greeks. There appeared to be no deliberate progression of subject, as the two men always seemed to be searching for the next thing to say. In doing so, the dialogue was presented as if unscripted and the actors merely improvising as they went along. This, coupled with Mamet’s acclaimed use of “Mamet Speak,” defined by the characters’ constantly cutting one another off, with sentences in rapid succession and in an oftentimes-tense tone, produced a natural dialogue that mimicked what one would surmise to be a real interaction between the two old men. Even though the topic was mentioned only a few times, the main theme of the play seemed to be concerned with death and its inevitability. The idea of death is intrinsic to the mind of every human being, particularly older people as they reach the end of their lives. The mention of death evoked a sensation of pity and empathy from the crowd, as it seemed to weigh heavily on the minds of the characters. As the play drew to a close, George began to speak of the …show more content…
George seemed to be slightly less emotionally reactive throughout and didn’t work himself up too much when in a dispute. As opposed to these behaviors, the man on the left side was more quick to anger and had a much firmer stance in his opinions. Emil would state an idea or belief with little supportive information and an unwillingness to change. For these, reasons I could easily see myself acting as George, I don’t generally react with sadness or anger to events or people in my life and am usually malleable in my beliefs and point of view. I also find it difficult to act angry which Emil often