Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Sustainability Issues with the Milk Industry

Better Essays
1202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sustainability Issues with the Milk Industry
Business Heritage, Culture and Sustainability

Business Heritage, Culture and Sustainability

(a)
A bottle of milk purchased in Christchurch is very like to be produced in the South island, either in Canterbury or Southland, which are the main dairying areas.
The production process for milk:
From the farm: milk is produced from grass, dairy cow’s graze on the grass and then they are milked twice a day using mechanical vacuum milking machines. The raw milk flows through stainless steel pipes to a refrigerated bulk milk tank. The milk is collected by road tanker every one to two days and taken to a milk processing plant.
The Separator: at the processing plant the first step is separation where the raw milk is passed through a separator, which spins 100 times per second to separate the milk from cream.
Standardisation: this is where cream is added back into the milk as some cows do not always produce the same amount of cream in their milk, also milk changes depending on the time of year.
Homogenisation: is the process where the milk is heated and pushed through a very small opening to stop the cream rising from the top this evens out the fat so it all tastes the same.
Pasteurisation: heats up the milk to almost boiling point to kill any bacteria and then the milk is cooled very fast.
Packaging: The final stage of production is the pumped in to cartons of plastic bottles and then sealed. (Fonterra, n.d, milking it section, para. 2)
The production of milk at a processing plant does not create many major issues relating to sustainable resources use and conservation. The key issues associated with the production of a bottle of milk are created at the start of production on dairy farms. Farmers engage in practices to enable the production of milk.
Cows can eat up to 70kg of grass per day (Fonterra, n.d, grazing section, para.1) which means a lot of land is needed for farming and chemical fertiliser is used on the soil to boost the growth of grass. Irrigation systems are also used to aid the growth of pastures to enable to dairy cows to continually graze so they can produce milk.
(b)
It is not environmentally sustainable to produce milk using the current method. One of the key issues is the use of chemical fertiliser. This fertiliser is used to increase the growth of pasture to allow farmers to maintain high numbers of stock per hector, which causes soil compaction and does not allow it to breath. The air spaces in the soil are very important as air and water travel through to the roots. Compacted soil leads to water logging, where bacteria that survive without oxygen flourish and create nitrous oxides (Greenpeace, 2010a, Chemical fertiliser - a corporate treadmill section, para.3)

The fertiliser destroys the living humus in the soil, the biology micro-organisms and minerals critical for plant health and performance. Humus is organic matter that has reached a point stability, where it will not break down any further and if conditions do not change, it may remain as it is for centuries. If the humus is not working, the soil becomes lifeless and hard as a result any that is put on top of the soil does not get absorbed instead runs off and pollutes water ways.

The fertilizer only creates growth of grass on the top of the soil and destroys the soils natural life cycle. Without this layer of natural humus, the chemicals in the fertilisers will eventually make its way down through the thin dead subsoil left behind, down into the earths underground fresh water tables. The chemical fertilisers destroys the nature’s own recycling system without earthworms and the soils micro-organisms that build humus decompose organic matter breakdown, manmade toxins protect plants and promote good soil structure, the soil erodes and can 't sustain life and becomes worthless. (Scoop, 2011, para.14)

Cows that graze on fertilized soil are also known to have digestion problems and other health issues.

(c) If this method of production is continued, there will be many future implications for the environment. The production of milk in Canterbury has many externalities as the cows on dairy farms produce a lot of pollution. The nutrient from farmland runs of into water ways and aquifers polluting the water which leads to algal blooms and degrades fish habitats. This is threating many native fresh water fish species and freshwater ecosystems (Forest and Bird, 2011, Freshwater species in freefall section, para.1).

The use of irrigation systems reduce water levels, by drying out springs, streams, lakes and rivers. Reduced water levels can block fish passage to and from the sea. The implications from this are again threatening ecosystems and using a lot of New Zealand’s water supply.

As the New Zealand dairy industry expands to meet demand overseas, more cows are breed which creates more greenhouse gases. Whens cows burp they emit methane into the atmosphere which is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide. (Greenpeace, 2010b, Agriculture and climate change section, para.1)

New Zealand’s agricultural sector contributes to half the greenhouse gas emissions, the use of chemical fertilisers, deforestation and gases emitted from cows are all factors that affect climate change. New Zealand’s clean and green image is also being tainted. (Greenpeace, 2010b, What happens if New Zealand agriculture doesn 't lift its game? section, para.1)

The production of milk not only affects New Zealand’s natural environment but also has contributed to the destruction of Indonesian and Malaysian rainforest. New Zealand has been importing palm-based animal feed for livestock to boost production.
In the last decade New Zealand’s demand for palm kernel animal feed has increased by 2000 per cent with the objective to produce more milk products without having to use more land. Fires are lit to clear the rain forests to make room for palm plantations, the conversion of carbon rich peatlands significantly contribute to climate change, creating 20 per cent of the global greenhouse gas emissions per year. The deforestation of these rain forests also destroys habitats for wildlife including animals such as orangutans and the sunatran tiger. If this method of process is to continue the future implications would increase climate change and species would to become extinct. (Greenpeace, 2010c, para.1)

.

References

Fonterra.(n.d). The storey of milk. Retrieved October 23, 2011, from http://www.fonterra.com/wps/wcm/connect/fonterracom/fonterra.com/Our+Products/The+Story+Of+Milk/
Forest and Bird. (2011). Agriculture. Retrieved October 23, 2011, from http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/saving-our-environment/threats-and-impacts-/threats-impacts-agriculture
Greenpeace. (2010a). Intensive Farming. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/campaigns/climate-change/smart-farming/the-bad/
Greenpeace. (2010b). Smart Farming. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/campaigns/climate-change/smart-farming/
Greenpeace. (2010c). Fonterra implicated in rainforest destruction. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/news/fonterra-exposed/

Scoop. (2011), The Peoples Choice Party 2011 Campaign, Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1105/S00037/the-peoples-choice-party-2011-campaign.htm

References: Fonterra.(n.d). The storey of milk. Retrieved October 23, 2011, from http://www.fonterra.com/wps/wcm/connect/fonterracom/fonterra.com/Our+Products/The+Story+Of+Milk/ Forest and Bird. (2011). Agriculture. Retrieved October 23, 2011, from http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/saving-our-environment/threats-and-impacts-/threats-impacts-agriculture Greenpeace. (2010a). Intensive Farming. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/campaigns/climate-change/smart-farming/the-bad/ Greenpeace. (2010b). Smart Farming. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/campaigns/climate-change/smart-farming/ Greenpeace. (2010c). Fonterra implicated in rainforest destruction. Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/news/fonterra-exposed/ Scoop. (2011), The Peoples Choice Party 2011 Campaign, Retrieved October 20, 2011, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1105/S00037/the-peoples-choice-party-2011-campaign.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    the need of detergent because all the fats has been taken out of milk and it allows…

    • 488 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Pasteurization: heat liquid to temp. that kills the most heat resistant pathogen but NOT all (milk)…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milk Pros And Cons

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People still can decide which milk to buy; either treated cow milk or non-treated cow milk. The problem comes when people think that treated herd milk is a potential threat to their lives because they are not well informed about the facts on which different studies have relied. Even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated there is no difference between recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) milk and non rBST milk, people still believe there are several health, economic and animal welfare issues linked to this hormone.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The CEO of Milk Processor Education Program, Julia Kadison, has launched the “Get Real” campaign. In her website, there’s a topic titled “The Truth on How Dairy Cows are Treated On Dairy Farms” including the article “Milking Machines”. In this short writing, she attempts to answer the question “Do the milking machines hurt the cows?”. She goes on to state that milking machines are better for cows because they are fast. What she fails to mention is how much milk the machines take from the cows and why they need to be milked so often. There are about 12 million fewer dairy industries than there was in 1950, yet milk production has increased by 116 billion pounds. How much milk do they take from the cow? They take 35-50 liters more milk than a calf would naturally need. Milk is originally produced for the calf, so why is the cow lactating at an abnormal rate? I’ll mention why the cows have to be milked so often since Kadison failed to state the reason. There’s a 55% risk of dairy cows getting a disease called mastitis. When having mastitis, the female cow’s mammary glands swell almost four times as big as they naturally are. This causes pain and irritation to the animal. Cows are injected with hormones that force them to lactate more, producing more milk, forcing them to undergo being milked more often. In addition, she said the machines were fast, but are they painful? Facts evaluated by…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the very early 1900’s, food handling had to take a massive toll. From meat hazards, the milking cows, meat cows, as well as other milk/meat breeds. If milk is not pasterized its possible to get sick and if you don't…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Milk is boiled, cooled and added to required amount of salt and flour to make into a thick paste. It is then applied to the boil.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem that my associate Keely and I wanted to analise was how to chemically test and show that milk is off and how this happens. We wanted to know this because we have just purchased a small dairy farm on the outskirts of Camperdown Victoria. We are curious about the science behind off milk, and are wondering if there are ways our milk stay fresher for longer.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fat Percentages In Milk

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The amount of protein present does affect the mass of the curds produced. Because skim milk has approximately 8.3 grams of protein per cup, while whole milk only has 8 grams of protein per cup, skim milk produced the curds with the greater mass. The curds yielded from skim milk averaged to 4 grams which is greater than the average of whole milk which was 3.7 grams. Likewise, 1% milk which has approximately 8.2 grams of protein had an average curd mass of 3.8 grams, which is slightly more than the average of 2% milk, with 8.1 grams of protein, that had an average curd mass of 3.7 grams. This shows that the hypothesis that the mass of curds will be higher when the percentage of protein is higher was supported by the data…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dairy industry along with all other sectors of animal production face large amounts of scrutiny from the general public. The majority of scrutiny…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fermenters

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is necessary to separate the microorganism from the product. Processing often involves drying or crystallization. The product is then ready for sale or distribution.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sister 1

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    [note: the remaining milk in the beaker was added with 5 ml dilute HAc and was heated to boiling until precipitate was formed. It was cooled and filtered.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lab Report

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    iii. We placed the evaporated milk in a beaker until it is ¾ full and heat it. We then observe the formation of milk skin at the top. Second is to remove the milk skin and heat again. Observe what happens.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Centrifuge Milk

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    as possible uh.. between batches of the same kind of milk produced at different plants. And the way you do this is by using a centrifuge for a process called separation, where the cream the uh.. fat is extracted from natural milk leaving behind skimm milk. Later, precise amount of milk fat can be added back into the skimmed milk. This standardizes the fat content in each of your milk products. 2%, half and half, that kind of thing. OK, so, before the centrifuge came into use, dairy farmer separated milk by allowing gravity to perform the process naturally. When it's allowed to set, milk eventually forms 2 layers uhm.. with the fat rising to the surface. Dairy farmers condense skims off that fat and preserve the milk beneath. Of course the main problem with this process was that it was well... inefficient. I bet you can imagine because of all that waiting time while gravity separated the skim milk from the uh.. from the cream. When the first cream separator was invented in 1877, it operated as a centrifuge, spinning the milk at the speed of 4000 revolutions per minute. The cream, which is uh.. lighter than the skim milk,…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milk and milk products cannot be stored for a long time; a great emphasis is put on their freshness. It is necessary to sell these products soon, and therefore businesses pursue to promote sales also with the help of temporary reduction of prices.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hospital Hygiene

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, it effects a reduction in the number of microorganisms (more than 99.9999% are killed).…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics