Preview

How Supporters of Slavery Used Legal, Religious, and Economic Arguments to Defend the Institution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Supporters of Slavery Used Legal, Religious, and Economic Arguments to Defend the Institution
Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been conflicts between the North and the South. Basically throughout the 1900s, the North and South acted somewhat childishly towards each other about different topics. As the North became more industrialized and self sufficient, the South stayed behind and depended heavily on other countries for manufactured goods in exchange for cotton. The North felt superior to the South, and the South was not pleased about that. Although most Northerners didn 't care much for slavery, there were handfuls that were abolitionists and attacked the South on their "backwards" economy that depended on slavery . In the South, not everyone was a slaveholder as one may think; there were actually more non slaveholders than slaveholders simply because slaves were expensive "property that only the wealthier Southerners could afford. Although many Southerners didn 't own slaves, they still did not attack the institution of slavery. Why? The answer is simple, many non-slaveholders hoped to become slaveholders one day. They also accepted the racist ways on which slavery was based. Both Southern slaveholders and non-slaveholders didn 't like the idea of emancipation simply because they feared that blacks might believe themselves equal with whites and back then, that seemed ridiculous . They concluded that emancipation would cause a race war and were therefore against any sort of abolition of slavery . This is why the supporters of slavery used legal, religious, and economic-2-arguments to defend the institution, they were simply accustomed to the lifestyle slavery provided for them and they weren 't going to let it go without a fight.

The supporters of slavery knew how to defend the institution well, especially when it came to legal rights. How could they protect the institution of slavery in their favor while using something that was common ground with the North as well? Southerners used the common ground of the constitution and



Bibliography: .Eaton, Clement. The Growth of Southern Civilization, 1790-1860 . 19612.Heyrman, Christine Leigh. Southern Cross: The Beginnings of the Bible Belt. 19973.Kolchin, Peter. American Slavery, 1619-1877. 19934.Information on South Search (Google). Online, Internet at http://docsouth.unc.edu/browse/subject/c.html5.Boyer, Clark, Kett, Salisbury, Sitkoff, Woloch. The Enduring Vision. Houghton-Mifflin. 2004. 6.Dred Scott Case Search (Yahoo). Online, Internet at http://library.wustl.edu/vlib/dredscott/7.The Fifth Amendment Search (Google). Online, Internet at http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html8.Wage Slavery Search (Dictionary). Online, Internet at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wage%20slavery

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1856 a law was passed that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote on whether or not or not to be a slave state. Kansas was the first to get all their votes in and it ultimately ended up being a slave state. John Brown and the anti-slavery advocates did not like the results of Kansas now being a slave state. In response to Kansas being a slave state they made a “Lawrence Kansas” which is ultimately a free-settlement in the territory of Kansas. Pro-slavery advocates did not like that they did this so they went to Lawrence Kansas and burnt the town to the ground. John Brown and his anti-slavery advocates despised that they did this to innocent people. So, he got revenge for the burning of the city by killing five pro-slavery supporters next…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery formed the backbone of the South economically. It was just as much the political and social basis of Southern identity, too. With the invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin, southern plantation owners had to buy more slaves to keep up with the demand for cotton. There was an ever-present demand, particularly by Northern states, for cotton. There became a growing economic dependence on slavery. James Henry Hammond’s manual, Instructions to His Overseer (c. 1840-1850), was designed for use on his large South Carolina estate. He was a strong supporter of slavery and the originator of the famous line, “Cotton is king.”…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As historian Edward Baptist uncovers in The Half Has Never Been Told, the extension of slavery in the initial eight decades after American independence drove the advancement and modernization of the United States. In the range of a solitary lifetime, the South developed from a thin seaside segment of exhausted tobacco manors to a mainland cotton domain, and the United States developed into an industrial, modern, and capitalist economy. Until the Civil War,…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Grady, Henry. “The New South.” Hist 202 U.S.: A Narrative History Vol. 2 Ed. Jennifer Pickel. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2012: 11-12. Print.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These views maintained continuity from earlier abolitionists like the Society of Friends during the Revolutionary Era. While questioning slavery, the North also took political approach. Knowing that ending slavery altogether was highly unlikely, the northern states still wanted to make sure that southern states did not outnumber them inside Congress. As people migrated into new lands that were gained from the Louisiana Territory, tensions rose higher. They were pretty high when Missouri applied for statehood as a slave state. If Missouri was allowed to enter as a slave state, then the free states would be overpowered in Congress. Maintaining a political balance of power was very important to both the North and the South as neither wanted to be subdue to the views of the other. Political actions were taken during the Missouri Compromise to ensure that slavery did not exceed the 54’ 40” line. This line was put into place to ensure that slavery did not expand northward or westward. In addition, the state of Maine was brought into play the very next year which maintained an equal number of free and slave states. The…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Northerners didn’t hate slavery enough to do anything about it. Sadly, it was an ugly part of American culture and people were content ignoring it so they could go about their lives. They didn’t agree with slavery but they feared that if the slaves were freed they would move north and take jobs away from white families. White people in the North were expanding westward into the territories where they could farm their own land and make money off crops. They did not want the territories to have the southern slave based labor system because it would only benefit a few wealthy people and it would greatly harm the country’s economy to expand slavery.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was another issue which was that the Northern states believed that slavery was against the consitiution and it should be abolished. While the Southern states wanted to keep slaves working their lands and not only wanted to keep the ones they had but get more slaves since their land were expanding. There was a lot of tension between the North and South due…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Northerners and some Southerners wanted to take away their slaves, but many southerners believed that without slaves the South simply could not function. They all wanted to protect their own way of…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start off, slavery had begun to die off after the American Revolution. According to Document 5, slavery got abolished almost immediately in some of the Northern states. Although some may argue that it took a lot longer for the states in the south to get rid of slavery, the revolution still made them begin to think about it. Without the revolution, the north probably wouldn’t have…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the expansion westward of United States, controversy between the Northern and the Southern States quickly arose. This was primarily due to the disagreement of what these new western territories would become- free or slave states. The Southern States wanted these new territories to support slavery so they could send more pro-slavery senators/ representatives to Congress, which was the opposite for the Northern States. Many important events from 1845-1861 quickly led to the start of the Civil War due to these Northern and Southern disputes.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the nineteenth century, a major cause of conflict amongst Northern and southern states was slavery. Northern states debated many logical reasons to abolish slavery. However southern states made a great rebuttal as to why slavery was not inhumane. John Calhoun’s defense of slavery, Frederick Law Olmstead’s travelogue of the South, George Fitzhugh’s The Blessing of Slavery, and Thomas R. Dew’s Speech to Virginia Legislative are all great examples as to why slavery can be considered as a positive good. However I in my opinion there is no reason as to why slavery should ever be considered as a positive thing.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue of Slavery, though believed by some to be no longer evident, is still, unfortunately, a huge industry throughout the entire world. A few include, sweatshops, sex trades, and even drug cartels. All these plague society, of the, “modern world.” Even though, many years ago, we claimed to have, “abolished,” slavery, the true reality, is that we only ended it in one aspect, in one place. We don't truly look at what still exists. We turn our back to the real issues, to simply pretend that they don't exist.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people, especially those in the south, believed that slavery should continue. Slave owners in the south were all for slavery continuing because it was much cheaper than having to hire laborers to harvest their crops and fields. Many people in the north were supporters of slavery too, because they faced major profits in…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays