Preview

Summary Of The Fifth Amendment Violation In Supreme Court Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1011 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Fifth Amendment Violation In Supreme Court Cases
Prohibition marked a period of subtle disregard for the law and American government in the 1920s. Bootleggers capitalized on the movement by gaining profits from illegal speakeasies, which offered Americans a drink and entertainment away from the workplace. As organized crime and its bosses grew more powerful, the American government investigated the matter to keep citizens safe and to encourage shoppers to spend their money on “productive industries” that contributed to the economy. However, after law enforcement gathered evidence through wiretaps to arrest suspected criminals, issues regarding the protection from illegal search and seizure arose within the courts. Judiciary examination of the Fourth Amendment asked the question of whether …show more content…
Police installed wiretaps without a warrant to listen to his phone calls. In a 5-4 decision, the Taft Court ruled that the police’s method of wiretapping did not violate Olmstead’s Fourth Amendment right to protection from unreasonable searches and seizures and did not violate his Fifth Amendment protection from self-incrimination. According to the majority, a Fourth Amendment violation requires a physical examination of a person or their possessions. Law enforcement did not violate Olmstead’s Fifth Amendment rights as well because “[Olmstead was] not forcibly or illegally made to conduct those conversations.” The telephone was a relatively new form of communication, but the understanding of a personal conversation existed. Since the First Amendment granted freedom of speech and assembly, as well as the freedom to hold private meetings, Americans should have had the right to express personal ideas without fear of government searches, regardless of the medium in which the communication took …show more content…
Moreover, the police broke a law in the state of Washington that made wiretapping illegal at the time. Despite this unethical behavior, the Court still sided with police, disregarding the illegal actions committed by one party while fighting to put the opposing party, who sought protection from the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, in jail. Brandeis recognized the issue with such government flippancy when he wrote, “if the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” If the Supreme Court, a body tasked with upholding the rights and promoting the welfare of millions of people, remained indifferent to instances of government abuse, it sent a message to the American people that the government will outweigh their own. Undoubtedly, the Court carried a nebulous view of what constituted a reasonable breach of the law. Olmstead v. United States allowed American citizens to think about their rights as they relate to the government. The right to privacy was central to citizens’ identity: the Founders had conferred such rights when writing the Constitution, and Brandeis argued that this protection endured past technological

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lago Vista Case

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atwater v City of Lago Vista (2001) was a case concerning the fourth amendment. This case was where the defendant Atwater was arrested for a seat belt violation. O’Connor wrote the dissent that the arrest was unreasonable. O’Connor stated “…pointless indignity’ that served no discernible state interest and yet holds that her arrest was constitutionally permissible (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2005).” She implies that if an officer believes someone committed a crime in their presence they can arrest the accused person. This in O’Connor’s opinion presents an issue with the precedence it sets. To her it seems that police officers can use this to explore options that would be otherwise not permitted without an arrest.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States was meant to expand the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment by making it more flexible, with the purpose of protecting citizens against invasive methods of surveillance from the government. Prior to this case the Court had ruled in the Olmstead v. U.S. that wiretapping did not violate a Fourth amendment violation since the government did not control the telephone wires and the agents did not trespass onto the property of Olmstead and it was gathered by hearing (souza). The Court said that there was no search or seizure since the government did not go onto the property or seized any papers that are protected under the Fourth Amendment ("Katz V. United…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roy Olmstead was accused of importing and possessing illegal liquors back in 1927. He was later proved guilty by wiretaps installed in his basement. Olmstead tried saying that his 4th and 5th amendment were violated, but in conclusion his 4th amendment rights were not infringed because mere wiretapping does not qualify under a search or seizure. To be searched means that they would physically have to be there searching for something without a warrant that is. They are allowed to do so with a warrant. The vote behind his rights were 5-4 not in his favor. So he was later detained and arrested by the police. In this court case the officials learned a lot about how they should think, they decided that they should not back down in that sort of situation…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ii. On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland, Ohio believed that a suspect in a bombing, as well as some illegal gambling equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused them without a search warrant. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Showing off a piece of paper, they broke in the door. Mapp asked to see the “warrant” and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled to take it away from Mapp and snatched the piece of paper away from her. They then handcuffed her. The 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” and the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights under the 14th Amendment was questioned before the Court. The illegal search in Mapp’s home and whether the evidence was admissible was challenged by many.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In October of 1919 the Volstead act passed over Wilsons veto and declared that after new year’s day of 1920 all traffic in beverages that contained more than one half of one per cent of alcohol by volume was illegal. Prohibition had been brought about by the movement towards conservatism and ‘normalcy’. As a result of prohibition a new class of criminal came about, usually an everyday citizen trying to make their fortune in ‘bootlegging’. Bootleggers were people who evaded the law and brewed their own alcohol, to sell to people on the street or to supply the ‘speakeasy’s’, which were essentially clubs where people could go to buy drinks and socialise. There was another business that sprung up as a result of prohibition, this was the rum trade, rum would be brewed in the Caribbean loaded onto ships that would be brought to America by people known as ‘rum runners’. Prohibition was almost impossible to police and enforce, while there would be small seizes of alcohol the majority of it would slip through the net. This was mainly because the local and federal police were being paid by the wealthy to turn a blind eye to ‘bootlegging’. One twelfth of the members of the prohibition bureau were dismissed for corruption and how many went undetected and remained in service will never be known. Prohibition on…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Societal norms refer to customs of the place and time. On December 18, 1967, the Supreme Court held that warrantless wire-tapping of a public phone booth to record a defendant’s conversations was an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The Court held that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy because he expected his phone conversation to remain private when he shut the door to prevent an unintended person from listening to his conversation.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Framers Intent Paper

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleading the Fifth “A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.” – Thomas Jefferson. Thirteen worthy representatives from the original British Colonies came together in Philadelphia in 1787 for a specific and important situation relating to the future of the United States of America as a new nation. During the late 18th century, Philadelphia became known as the epicenter for emerging commerce, and many of the most important political debates and meetings were held there. During the meetings in 1787 including Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and other Founding Fathers primarily concerned the approval of the new Constitution of the United States by the American populace.…

    • 2440 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1920s was an era of corruption within the law. Through prohibition, the government was enforcing discipline. Prohibition was forbidding the production of alcohol and restrictions because of the reckless use of alcohol. The government banned alcohol in attempt to “reduce drinking by eliminating the businesses that manufactured, distributed, and sold alcoholic beverages” (“Why”). The effect of prohibition was bootlegging, which…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gang organizations saw a way to create a “black market” for alcohol, “The growth of the illegal liquor trade under Prohibition made criminals of millions of Americans” (Lerner). This showed how desperate some Americans were to get alcohol. Even some officials were tempted by money, “Police officers and Prohibition agents alike were frequently tempted by bribes or the lucrative opportunity to go into bootlegging themselves” (Lerner). Corrupt officials was one of the key reasons Prohibition was a huge failure for the US. People found many loopholes in the 18th Amendment. For example, “One of the legal exceptions to the Prohibition law was that pharmacists were allowed to dispense whiskey by prescription for any number of ailments, ranging from anxiety to influenza. Bootleggers quickly discovered that running a pharmacy was a perfect front for their trade” (Lerner). This show one of the many loopholes of Prohibition. For these reasons and many others congress was pushed to make a final decision on…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After hearing the speaker defend his position on why the Fifth amendment should be abolished, I find myself questioning whether the speaker made logical points. After further review, I have concluded that I cannot be in agreement with the speaker regarding his stance on abolishing the Fifth amendment.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment Clauses

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This paper examines the boundaries of the Fifth Amendment Clauses. It concentrates on the parts of the amendment that has been ignored. It is aimed at achieving a reasonable balance between the state 's interest and the individual 's. It will also try to evaluate the relevance of the Fifth Amendment to the constitution. Different clauses will be drawn of the fifth constitution to determine whether the geared purpose the Fifth Amendment has been put to task in recent time and whether its success is being experienced.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The fourth amendment of the Unified Conditions of America constitution peruses as takes after; The privilege of the general population to be secure in their people, houses, papers, and impacts, against outlandish quests and seizures, might not be disregarded, and no warrants should issue, but rather upon reasonable justification, bolstered by Vow or attestation, and especially portraying the place to be sought, and the people or things to be seized."…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Prohibition Is Wrong

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When the Prohibition laws passed in 1919 that banned alcohol, expectations didn’t go as planned. The law was immediately broken by an abundance of illegal activity. There was Bootlegging, which is the term for buying and selling illegal alcohol, became widespread. Prohibition also lead to corruption of law enforcements officers and politicians around the country(Temperance). The corruption of law enforcement during this time helped build forceful crime syndicates, one being the operation of acclaimed gangster Al Capone. The most unforeseen…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arizona (1978), the police collected evidence for four days after the suspect’s apprehension and the death of a police officer at the time of the arrest. He was convicted for murder, assault and narcotics offences. However, because they collected the evidence without a warrant, the suspect’s conviction on the murder of the police officer and assault charges was reversed by the Arizona Supreme Court, but upheld the narcotics conviction. This is a prime example of where the Fourth Amendment protects against unlawful searches. Even though the evidence was overwhelming proof that the suspect murdered the police officer, it was the responsibility of the police to do their due diligence to conduct the search legally. Had they obtained the proper warrants, the conviction would have still been upheld and the suspect would have been punished for the crime he…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays