Preview

Summary Of Miles Unger's Machiavelli: A Biography

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Miles Unger's Machiavelli: A Biography
Miles Unger offers an interesting take on Machiavelli in, Machiavelli: A Biography, written in 2011. Right off the bat, Unger’s Machiavelli regards priests as “charlatans and swindlers” Upon his death, a prominent church man described Machiavelli as “an enemy of the human race” with the Pope following suit several years in the future-a move that the anticlerical Machiavelli “might have taken as a backhanded compliment”. Unger argues that because Machiavelli’s works were placed in the Index of Prohibited Books, this give credence to the argument of Machiavellian atheism. Machiavelli’s goal in his writings encourages the hearkening back to the ancient writers such as Aristotle in an effort to bypass Christianity with paganism. Christianity proved too weak in the mind of Machiavelli, therefore something older and more violent needed to be used in order to stave off the corruption and attack on liberty that the Papacy brought. Although an excellent read, Unger offers little …show more content…
Similar to Machiavelli in Hell, this work, Black describes, as an intellectual biography. Throughout his work, Machiavelli, published in 2013, he constantly attacks the notion that Machiavelli respected his Judeo-Christian upbringing and states in numerous lines of his adherence to what defines atheism, even though Viroli and others do not subscribe to the possibility in the period. His major argument can be summarized in his introduction, noting, “Machiavelli regarded morality and religion as a cloak to be exploited to promote or vindicate the ruler or state; morality and religion were key tools that regularly had to be subverted for selfish ends.” His argument reads deeply into the cynical and ironic trend of reading history regarding Machiavelli’s works rather than offering a literal translation of the texts, making works like Viroli and De Grazia seem a bit white-washed, despite the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People who wanted fame and power in this new world of humanism and self-righteousness had to deserve it. No longer did a supreme authority, such as the pope, appoint officials and leaders. The authority rested in the hands of the person willing to take charge. This approach to gaining wealth and power can be described as Machivellian, named so by the influence of ideologist Niccolo Machiavelli. Machiavelli wrote one of the most influential political books of all time, called the Prince, which is considered the most lasting work on Italian Renaissance. In his novel, Machiavelli writes of " cruelty, well used or badly used," and warns the compassionate and humanistic prince "not to make bad use of this compassion".(Burke p.196) Machiavelli expanded on his belief in the Prince, that Italians should behave with ferocity when it comes to politics, and should back up that ferocity with a unified force. Machiavelli's principles have had a profound effect on the way Europe and the rest of the world have viewed politics over centuries, and truly show the Rennaissance's uncanny trait of promoting individualism and social Darwinism.<br><br>The Italian Renaissance has made a major impact on the rest of Europe, leaving an intellectual and artistic heritage that…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli – a diplomat exposed to decadent, cynical of the true nature of humanity, reflecting darker aspects of Humanism that man is essentially corrupt, self-serving and treacherous…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian historian, politician, diplomat, and philosopher during the late 1400s early 1500s. Machiavelli is considered the father of modern political theory; and his theories are most prominent in his short book, “The Prince”. Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is main purpose is to tell rulers how to remain in power once they have gained it. The best way to go about ruling according to Machiavelli is to simply rule well. However if this does not work Machiavelli recommends several different strategies such as the use of violence. During Machiavelli’s time his theories were not widely accepted and because of this he died in shame. Machiavelli acted on his thoughts and beliefs despite what society taught and believed. However once time passed Machiavelli’s philosophies were better understood and accepted. Other philosophers began take portions of his philosophy to add to their own. This brought upon a new respected look to Machiavelli rather than the shameful look he died with.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During Machiavelli's life all he started out wanting to do was be part of the political office. For fourteen year he accomplished is goal. Eventually though he lost his job followed by being arrested and tortured. After being released he never returned to office again. Instead he began writing and learned he was excellent at it. Everything he did in his life lead him to his writing career and to producing him most known book the…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Church said things must be done a certain way and people must behave a certain way but Machiavelli argued that we shouldn’t let god solely control our lives and to live for once and take matters into your own hands creating your own destiny. The Prince is one big idea of the way things should be and presented views of humanism and the Catholic Church dogma that are backed by lessons in history that Machiavelli used to demonstrating the way a ruler should lead in regards to government. The Prince says argues not only individuality but collectivism in humans as a…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli, a 15th ce writer and philosopher, had a negative and distrustful attitude towards mankind as he writes in his book “The Prince” about how to be the most effective ruler. His writing style throughout the book reflects that he was pessimistic towards man’s fortune.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    attacked by the north, William lead his army to attack through the south. It was a clear victory…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: a Cynic?

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli feels that mankind is selfish and only exemplifies good qualities from fear of punishment, or when it is to benefit them. One can easily discern Machiavelli's views on this matter from his statement as he argues that it is better to be feared than loved. "Love is held by a chain of obligation which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purpose; but fear is maintained by a dread of punishment which never fails." This is evident today through the structure of two main outlines that greatly shape our lives and develop our world views: our justice systems and religions. Religion and cultural laws always seem to model somewhat after one another. This is an affirmation of the power that fear holds. People greatly fear the religious repercussions of immorality; thus governments tend to take advantage of such a tool and incorporate the same thoughts and ideas into their laws. The two play hand in hand in directing the actions that mankind plays out.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Notably, Salman Rushdie who in the chapter is cited as calling Machiavelli a “democrat” and “messenger.” Although Klosterman writes “that’s a different argument for a different book,” (he is more concerned with the immutability of the negative connotation of “Machiavellian” we are nonetheless persuaded to consider this possibility. Perhaps Klosterman included this aside because it parallels his unconventional admiration for Newt Gingrich and in a like manner, although Machiavelli is "culturally unlikeable,” unconventional wisdom suggests the opposite. That is, society only views his mistake of “consciousness” but ignores what’s beneath the villainous veil—ambition, which is admirable (Klosterman…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Page 71 What does Machiavelli say it is necessary for a Prince to do to "hold his own?"…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays