Preview

Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie
J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?” Mackie’s position on the debate question is negative for various reasons. He believes the main problem is that God is supposed to be omnipotent and wholly good, but evil still occurs
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma

    Some atheists will push Euthyphro 's dilemma further by asking, "Is the character of God good because it is God 's character or is it God 's character because it is good?". One thus could argue that by offering an alternative Craig just pushes the dilemma back one step and does not inherently solve the problem. However, is this a plausible counter argument? I believe not. Just as Aristotle argued that an actual infinite regress of cause and effect was impossible; there has to be a self-sufficient, ultimate stopping point or else the process of giving explanations will never come to an end. I believe as a theist, that there is a stopping point that is definitive of what is good and bad; we must come to a point where we must allow that there is an entity which makes moral decrees because those decrees are good in themselves AND the grounding of the goodness of those decrees resides entirely within that entity. That entity, I call ‘God.’…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    William Rowe Good Vs Evil Summary
    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William Rowe Good Vs Evil Summary

    Pramiti Sankar PHIL 100 AD0 3 March 2024 Section 1: Introduction In this paper, I will critique William L. Rowe's argument from the problem of evil against the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God. Rowe constructs a deductively valid argument that aims to show that the existence of intense suffering in the world provides rational grounds for atheism - the belief that such a theistic God does not exist. While his argument is logically valid, there are ultimately not sufficient grounds to confidently affirm the truth of the first premise because of our inherent human limitations in knowledge, potential ignorance of goods beyond our comprehension, fallibility in evaluating goods versus evils, and the importance of preserving…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philip Hallie’s “from Cruelty to Goodness” and Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil’
    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philip Hallie’s “from Cruelty to Goodness” and Friedrich Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil’

    The professor Philip Hallie’s ‘From Cruelty to Goodness’ radiates unwavering genuine philanthropy which by its nature oppose the cruelty and imbalance of power he talks about. The understanding of how cruelty works goes through the understanding what cruelty is and what morality has to say about that. Professor Hallie recognizes two types of ethics- negative and positive- that illuminate the path of good-making. The negative is the ban for actions associated with deliberate harm-making and pain-inflicting on other human beings. The most significant negative ethical rules are the Ten Commandments, says the professor. As reverse, the positive rules enjoin actions that preserve human’s welfare. The positive ethics commands activity; demands courage, and takes sacrifice. The positive ethical rules are for the brave. In close association with the ethical rules, whether negative or positive, comes the question what cruelty is? Had we looked at the institutionalized type of cruelty from the near past to nowadays as the slavery, the Holocaust, the political prisons and the prisoner-of-war camps we would see the cruelty is not mere bloodshed, cut-off limbs, beatings and other atrocities which all are included though. The cruelty goes beyond that- it affects the self-respect, self-esteem, all of that which makes person a person and destroys it. So the cruelty not only (often) kills the body, it first kills the spirit, the soul, the life inside. As professor Hallie uncovers the cruelty derives from something so frequently seen as the imbalanced power in the relationship. The relationship could be both personal (private) or institutionalized. The imbalance is being born when the power between the two parties is unequally distributed, often leaving one of the parties with negligible or no power. Respectively, the strong party gains not only the power to decide for herself but to rule over the destiny of the powerless side. The imbalance of power resides in families, business…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey
    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey

    In my opinion, I believe that McCloskey’s arguments against the existence of God is somewhat biased. By biased I’m inferring that his argument is a one-sided view that attempts to provide proof that God doesn’t exist based on man-made judgments about what an all-powerful, omniscient being can, should, or would do. I conclude that this is unreasonable because as mere humans, we don’t have the capability to understand the magnitude or reasoning of God. Who are we to determine what The Creator should do in any circumstance? That is not our position as humans to do this for God. Preoccupied with what an all-powerful…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Design Argument For God's Existence
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is The Design Argument For God's Existence

    One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Thus, on this general line of argument, it is a necessary truth that such a being exists; and this being is the God of traditional Western theism. This article explains and evaluates classic and contemporary versions of the ontological argument.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Possibility Of Evil By Eudora Welty
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of The Possibility Of Evil By Eudora Welty

    In Shirley Jackson’s story “The Possibility of Evil” in which Miss Adela Strangeworth writes letters to get rid of the evil in her town, and in Eudora Welty’s story “A Worn Path,” where a grandmother, Phoenix Jackson makes a hero’s journey into town to pick up medicine for her grandson. Both Adela and Phoenix are duty bound they feel like they have to write letters or make the trip into town and nothing is going to stop them.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis
    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis

    Thesis: The conflict behind the idea of evil is why a perfect God would allow evil to exist on earth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mackie's Argumentative Analysis
    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mackie's Argumentative Analysis

    From these it follows that a good omnipotent thing eliminates evil completely, and then the propositions that a good omnipotent thing exists, and that evil exists, are incompatible” (Feinberg & Shaffer-Landau, 2013, p. 101). To describe evil I will use Dostoevsky’s projected definition that evil is the suffering of the innocent. Mackie’s stance is that a good, omnipotent being would eliminate evil entirely, and therefore it is impossible that a good omnipotent being exists while there is still evil in the world. Dostoesky states a belief that a “good” God would not allow the brutal suffering of…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Teleological Argument
    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Teleological Argument

    Some theists of the Abrahamic persuasion claim that the harmony of the universe is proof of an intelligent designer. This argument is known as the teleological argument and has evolved from classical philosophy to modern theology. In addition, subscribers of the Abrahamic religions also hold that God has attributes that include omniscience, omnipotence, and benevolence. Fundamentally, God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. In contrast, God created a perfect universe that is in harmony, but occasionally practices miracles. Can the teleological argument, miracles, and God’s attributes coexist in a rational universe? This essay’s goal is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Free Will Argument Against Moral Evil
    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Free Will Argument Against Moral Evil

    Intro: In this article, I first presented the Free Will argument. Then I showed how it fails by questioning the necessity of natural evils. After that, I defended my response against a likely rebuttal.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Augustine's Response To The Problem Of Evil
    • 3803 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Augustine's Response To The Problem Of Evil

    Despite Mackie seeming to have proven the logical problem of evil to be sound it is not surprising that theists have sought to resolve the problem rather than abandoning their beliefs. Responses to the problem of evil fall into the categories of defences or theodicies. Generally speaking a defence is used in response to the logical problem, simply showing how there is no logical inconsistency. This does not require an explanation of evil, nor need it be true, as a false though coherent explanation can be sufficient to show logical compatibility. These may also be known as weak theodicies.…

    • 3803 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy
    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Path To The Banality Of Evil Summary
    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Path To The Banality Of Evil Summary

    Project Narrative This project will focus on two primary texts of Hannah Arendt; "The Decline of the Nation State and the End of the Rights of Man" and Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, while comparing their core theories to main ideologies of Chinese philosophy. In The Decline of the Nation State and the End of the Rights of Man," Arendt discusses the situation of stateless people after World War I.…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics