Summary Of Answering The Question, What Remains Of The Enlightenment

In reflecting upon Emmanuel C. Eze's essay, "Answering the Question, What Remains of the Enlightenment," As someone who grew up in a Catholic household, I found myself navigating through a difficult interplay of faith and reason. Growing up, my understanding of faith was largely shaped by the practices observed within my Catholic Church. Sunday Mass, baptism, confession, communion, and confirmation are the sacraments I have completed. However, I must say that I have never engaged in religious education or theological study during high school, but I have had conversations with my friends in relation to faith and the context of God. Therefore, the transition from high school to college was hard, given that I have classes that are completely different from
For instance, Kant's notion of moral autonomy suggests that individuals have the capacity to reason independently and act according to universal moral principles. He might argue that if Enlightenment ideals are properly understood and applied, it can lead to the recognition of the inherent dignity and equality of all individuals, regardless of race or background. However, Kant's emphasis on rationality and autonomy might overlook the systemic and historical factors that contribute to inequality and oppression. Eze's critique highlights the need to consider power dynamics and social structures that perpetuate injustice, which Kant's framework alone may not fully address. After engaging with both Eze's view of the Enlightenment and Kant's perspective on reason and autonomy, I find myself in a nuanced position regarding faith and reason. Growing up in a Catholic household, I was exposed to the importance of faith and religious tradition. Eze's essay prompts me to critically re-examine the relationship between faith and reason, particularly in the context of the Enlightenment's