Preview

Summary: Keeping The Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Keeping The Death Penalty
The death penalty
Introduction
The death penalty was abolished in the UK in 1969 and was later followed by the Northern /Ireland on the 25th of July 19973 , it was abolished due to the Britain signing the 13th Protocol which didn’t allow the death penalty under any circumstances, The last death penalty was given to Peter Antony on the 13th of August in 1964 . One of the other reasons was due to Timothy Evans who was a young man who was hanged on the 9th of March 1950.He was charged of the murder of his wife and baby daughter which was uncalled for because sixteen years later he was found out to be innocent ,But it was already too late as he had already been erroneously hanged .It was found out that his co-tenant John Reginald Christie
…show more content…
These are just some of a major list of killers in the UK since the death penalty has been removed.
Serial killers
Frederick West was a serial killer between 1967 and 1987.Him and his wife Rose West tortured, raped and ruthlessly killed at least 11 young women. Rose West even murdered Fred’s first daughter Charmaine West whilst Fred was in prison serving a theft charge. Most of the murders happened between 1973 and 1979 .The couple were later charged in 1994 and found guilty on 10 counts of murder but it was already too late as Fred had killed himself 10 months earlier , If the death penalty was not abolished would this have happened ?
Dr Harold Fredrick Shipman was a British doctor and was one of the most prolific serial killers ever recorded history of proven murders with more than 250 murders to his name on the 31st of j January 2000 he was found guilty for only 15 murders and was sentenced only to life in prison .2 years later it was found that 80% of his murders where women who he was meant to be “taking care of”. Dr Shipman later killed himself on January 13th 2004 whilst in
…show more content…
But if the death penalty was brought back would-be criminals would think twice before committing a offense punishable by death and due to this the society would gain security an example of this is China. Last year alone over 2000 people were killed due to the death penalty , even though china has one of the greatest populations in the world it has one of the lowest due to its strict laws.

The death penalty is still in use today in some states In America, But there is a trend to all the death row in mates7 out of 10 are black , so is death penalty fair ? From the research done by Bryan Stevenson more black males are killed on death row every year than any other race .So is the American criminal justice system fair? Because to me it doesn’t look like that and could this happen if the death penalty was brought back to England? If this did happen in England it could result in many people being unfairly killed due to the colour of their skin or where they come from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shipman was convicted on 15 murders. He was also convicted for forgery and sentenced to life in prison. He was charged for the deaths of Marie West, Irene Turner, Lizzie Adams, Jean Lilley, Ivy Lomas, Muriel Grimshaw, Marie Quinn, Kathleen Wagstaff, Bianka Pomfret, Norah Nuttall, Pamela Hillier, Maureen Ward, Winifred Mellor, Joan Melia and Kathleen Grundy. On January 13, 2004, Dr. Shipman was found in his prison cell hanging from the ceiling. He used bed sheets to tie to the window bars of the cell.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harold Shipman Case Study

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Harold Shipman, was a British doctor and one of the most prolific serial killers in recorded history with up to 250 proven murders between 1971 and 1998. In total, 459 people died while under his care, but it is uncertain how many of those were Shipman's victims, as he was often the only doctor to certify a death. On 31 January 2000, a jury found Shipman guilty of 15 murders. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and the judge recommended that he never be released. After his trial, The Shipman Inquiry began on 1st September 2000, lasting almost two years it was an investigation into all deaths certified by Shipman. About 80% of his victims were women, his youngest victim being a 41 year old man. Much of Britain's legal structure concerning health care and medicine was reviewed and modified as a direct and indirect result of Shipman's crimes. Shipman is the only British doctor who has been found guilty of murdering his patients. Shipman died on the 13th January 2004 after hanging himself in his cell at Wakefield Prison.…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Decline of Executions – as a public concern about the death penalty has increased, the use of capital punishment has declined, falling from 74 executions in 1997 to 37 in 2008.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apart from a short time in the mid-to-late 20th century when a freeze on capital punishment was ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court, this system of punishment has been in constant use in the United States for most of its history. Proponents and opponents have always been at odds over whether the practice should be continued or abolished completely. Lining up on one side are those who believe that the practice deters crime and is cheaper than warehousing a criminal for life in a maximum-security prison and lining up on the other side are those that believe the practice is inhumane and fraught with inconsistencies which make it antiquated and a barbaric form of punishment. Even though the United States…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the death penalty was later reinstating and ruled constitutional by the supreme court, there is no longer an arbitrariness to the death penalty and states have reevaluated their status for capital offenses and have reduced juror discretion.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    To constitute even more standards, “in 1994, President Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act that expanded the federal death penalty to some sixty crimes.” Offenses punishable by death were extended to include treason, murdering a government official, kidnapping resulting in death, and the running of a large-scale drug enterprise. Despite the countless crimes for which the death penalty could be applied, women have historically received the death penalty at a lesser rate to men, with only about three percent of executions being females. In fact, in more recent years, this percentage has dwindled even further, with only about one percent of the people executed in the United States being women. Besides less women put to death, capital punishment has continued to decline for many years as an exceeding amount of convicts are placed in correctional facilities in attempts to be rehabilitated.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nvq 2

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dr Harold Fredrick Shipman(14 January 1946 – 13 January 2004) was an English and d[->0]octor with 250 plus murders being positively ascribed to him.After his trial, the Shipman Inquiry[->1] chaired by Dame Janet Smith[->2], begun on 1 September 2000 and lasting almost two years, investigated all deaths certified by Shipman. About 80% of his victims were women. His youngest victim was a 41-year-old man. Much of Britain's legal structure concerning health care and medicine was reviewed and modified as a direct and indirect result of Shipman's crimes. Shipman is the only British doctor who has been found guilty of murdering his patients.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a waste of money, time and space. The death penalty simply confuses the community and blurs the line between right and wrong, since you are hypocritically punishing someone for killing another human, by in return killing them also. The death penalty isn’t decreasing the murders so why re-instate it? Imagine the affect on young children when they find out what happens to hazardous criminals, it would ruin the child’s innocence. They death penalty bring nothing but suffering to the family of the criminal, and a negative atmosphere throughout the community. If it were your child on death row wouldn’t you want them to have a second chance? Once again, I state with utmost important, the death penalty should remain as a figure of the past and we should remain civilised and keep our-self and community away from this inhumane act as long as…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that 1,432 people have been executed since 1976? Capital punishment, aka the death penalty has claimed countless lived since it’s establishment in the United States in 1608. Executions happen pretty often, with 38 people being killed last year alone. The death penalty is an unnecessary and horrible punishment which should not be allowed.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric way to stop crime. Most kids have heard the expression “do not fight fire with fire.” Using the death penalty is doing just that. Punishing criminals for murder by doing exactly what landed them in jail in the first place seems counterproductive. Instead, making felons live in prison, reflecting on their actions, gives them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. No one would be able to live with themselves if they were involved with an innocent man being wrongfully executed. Eliminating capital punishment would make that fear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics