Preview

Sue Rodriguez

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sue Rodriguez
Sue Rodriguez- Assisted Suicide By: Monique

Sue Rodriguez, once a woman who was lively and healthy women much like the rest of us was given the horrible news that she had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in early 1991 changing her life tremendously. Little did she know her fight for equality of life would create a milestone in Canadian Law. Sue Rodriguez fought long and hard to demand the right to assisted suicide, which at the time was illegal under the Criminal Code of Canada, being a punishable act for up to a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Ms. Rodriguez argued that Section 241 (b) of the Criminal Code (which prohibits assisted suicide) violated her constitutional right to life, liberty and security of the person under S. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Unfortunately both the British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed her application. Sue Rodriguez at her final attempt of trying to grant herself the right to assisted suicide appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, the verdict resulting in a five to four decision with the Supreme Court of Canada dismissing her appeal. In 1994, Ms. Rodriguez decided to take matters into her own hands, with the help of an anonymous physician Sue Rodriguez ended her life.

Assisted Suicide is something I will never be able to give an honest opinion about, unless you personally have had a loved with a terminal illness asking for assisted suicide I don’t think anyone can voice if this practice is fair or not. Any case dealing with a terminally ill victim grasps compassion from people looking at the case, so I think no matter what most people put pity on Sue Rodriguez and jump to her side. Ms. Rodriguez under the Charter Section 7 deserves to be entitled to: ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    sue rodriguez

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Directions. Copy the question below onto your piece of binder paper. Write at least a full page…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are times when life takes an unforeseen route, and one is faced with an obstacle or situation that was not expected. Many people are diagnosed with terminal diseases, have accidents and are left with severe impairments, and suffer horrendous complications from medical issues. One has the right, according to law, to make medical decisions about their care and treatment options. But should one have the right to end their life? Assisted, or voluntary euthanasia, is the direct administration of a lethal agent to end one’s life at the request of…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is obvious why this case and especially its verdict has caused such an uproar with ethicists and society. The ethical dilemma presented in this case is whether Canadian law has the authority to prohibit Sue Rodriguez the right to pursue physician assisted suicide as a way to end her life.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Letter

    • 875 Words
    • 1 Page

    The argument over assisted suicide began with Sue Rodriguez in 1993. Rodriguez argued that section 241 of the…

    • 875 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ending of one’s life, terminally ill or not, should not be done purposely by another man’s hands. If such procedures were considered acceptable, every ill person with no will to continue living would try to find ailments that deem assisted suicide. Jack Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death,” was a lifelong activist for physician-assisted suicide. Kevorkian was said to have assisted in 130 suicides of terminally ill patients during his life and is looked at as a sick and twisted killer to many, but as a brave, respected pathologist to others. To look back on his history and past activity, is extremely bizarre and unusual; there is everything from leaving pathology in the 70’s to make a movie, to advocating for the usage of medical experiments on criminals during execution. Assisted suicide violates the Fourteenth amendment, which prohibits government from depriving a person of life, liberty and property without ensuring fairness. The act is also by a general consensus, seen as morally and ethically taboo. However, if the patients asked Dr. Kevorkian to assist in their suicide, is he deserving of the criminal charges he has landed, or should he be seen as merely a doctor obeying his patients’ wishes? The facts that present themselves show that Dr. Kevorkian’s actions were arguably unjustified.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2015, 57-year-old Simon Binner was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease and was given 6 months to two years to live. Initially, he accepted this and wanted to make the most of his time with his wife and family. However, his condition deteriorated immensely within the first few weeks, and resulted in Simon losing the use of his voice. Faced with the prospect of a rapid decline physically, Simon decided to tell his family that he was considering ending his life at a suicide clinic in Switzerland. Similar to Ken’s realisation that he was not living but was existing, Simon came to a similar conclusion and also had to fight for what the best was for him. Enduring similar moral, emotional and legal obstacles on his journey, Simon was granted the right to assisted suicide in a clinic in Switzerland where he took his own life with a lethal l injection. He died at peace, with integrity and with dignity. Similar to Ken, Simon’s right to decide his path was restored by the law and I am so pleased that the law is able to bring reason and justice to those truly…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weeds vs. Flowers

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a firm believer in physician-assisted suicide, giving his patients the dignity and respect that they deserved in making this last major decision for their life and how they wanted to end it. His patients thought of him as a hero because he aided them in their major time of need, and they felt very comfortable with him because they didn’t have to worry about feeling awkward when bringing up this method of help. The family members of Kevorkian’s patients were ultimately happy that he provided such ease to their loved ones, and showed nothing but care and respect for those individuals. This decision is a heavy burden to bear because of the feelings that the majority of people feel is wrong and immoral. Dr. Kevorkian was convicted of second degree murder in 1999 because of assistance with euthanizing one of his patients Thomas Youk, who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease in 1998. He was provided with financial support by an organization called “The Hemlock Society” for his lawsuit, and they also referred patients to him for their aid in finding a caring physician that would end their suffering.…

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A number of advocacy organizations have labeled Bill C-14 as being unconstitutional. For example, Peter Hogg, one of the foremost authorities of constitutional law in Canada, said that Bill C-14 is “inconsistent with last year’s landmark Carter decision, which struck down the ban on assisted dying as a violation of the charter right to life, liberty and security of the person.” (Bryden, 2016, p.1). In reply to the government’s argument of creating safeguards for assisted dying, he said that the law goes too far as it restricts a “whole category of people who have won the right” to assisted dying as a result of the Carter case (Bryden, 2016, p.2). Similarly, others criticizers believe that it is unconstitutional to limit who can access physician-assisted dying. They argue that the Court in Carter had already stipulated what conditions are required to permit assisted dying. For example, the government admitted in a case brought before the Alberta Court of Appeal, that the Carter decision does not require an applicant for physician-assisted dying to be at or near the end of life. Critics say this admission clearly illustrates the questionable…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    New technological advances allow for patients to stay alive in situations that they normally could not survive. This causes an increasingly problematic conflict between medical and legal systems. The Uniform Declaration of Death Act allows for a somewhat reliable definition for death in both systems. However, some situations still challenge the universally accepted definition of death. Lia’s situation is a perfect example of how a medical definition of death conflicts with legal conditions. Lia’s complex medical situation showcases how death challenges both the medical and legal systems in America, making it very difficult to offer a concrete definition.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 2016, Canadian Federal Legislation released new laws on legalizing assisted death(1). Some people is opposed to these laws since they believe that one should not give up on her or his life and consider assisted death as murdering, whereas others hold a different opinion. Most of the people argue this problem base on the perspective of a patient and neglected another group involved in assisted death--the doctors.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A hotly debated issue regarding the quality of life for terminally ill patients revolves around the morality and legal implications of euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide which is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease, or in an irreversible coma. There are already a multitude of laws in place regulating physician assisted suicide in some states and countries, as well as laws preventing the practice. But despite these preventative laws physician assisted suicide remains an underground practice to relieve patient suffering. In lieu of the supposed moral issues associated with physician assisted suicide,…

    • 3211 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking at the side of those who are for assisted suicide you can understand why it could be a good idea to have this option. If somebody is terminally ill, they do not want to go through all the excruciating pain, and their loved ones don’t want to see them go through it. When somebody is diagnosed…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She concludes by discussing the treatable depression and avoidable pressures that lead to the majority of assisted suicides. As the debate transitions into the question and answer portion, the panel first discusses the difference between a patient being taken off life support and a patient consuming lethal drugs. They also acknowledge the concept of a “slippery slope” and analyze whether assisted suicide is a gateway to euthanasia. Though both sides agree that an extensive psychological exam is a necessary prerequisite for assisted suicide, there is conflict over the effectiveness of current laws. It is clear that the anti-legalization debaters prioritize stopping pain by any means necessary, while the pro-legalization panel values the patient’s wishes. Finally, the debate proceeds to the closing statements. Peter Singer, advocating for the motion, reiterates that to have the option of aid in dying is something terminally ill patients deserve, because it is a person’s right to decide if life is worth living or…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays