Study case 2
Half a Pie or None. 2
Case Study #!
Half a Pie of None
Pertaining to the question of Why doesn 't Mr. Green confront CEO Charles about gender stereotyping the Evaluator 's position? I feel Mr. Green understood that if he spoke to CEO Charles he would not make any head way on the issue of hiring a woman for the position . He made it perfectly clear he thought a man would be better suited for holding the position of evaluator, and would not allow any woman on his evaluation team. The CEO was stereotyping and felt it was in the best interest to hire a male for the job rather than a woman even if shes better qualified to do the work. I think Mr. Green knew that if Ms. Anderson was ever going to be promoted to the position she so well deserved he would have to help her to get there. If I was Mr. Green and made the decision to confront the CEO about stereotyping I would use a professional and positive manner to explain my position on the issue. I would provide him with the positive outcomes which would make it in the best interest of the company to hire the individual best qualified for the position. I think two specific suggestions that could be used for Mr. Green are to encourage the CEO of the company to understand that changes need to be made and his way of having preconceive notions was not going to help the company to flourish and prosper. Another suggestion I would give to the CEO would be to tell him to keep an open mind. A smart business man welcomes change and recognizes the competitive advantages of having the best qualified person for the job.
I think the level of sexual discrimination within the organization is changeable over time through
Half a Pie or None
Half a Pie or None, 3 internal interventions education, and positive communication within the company. I think the world changes around us everyday and if the company wants to stay competitive, maintain good work ethics, and etiquette, it must do what needs to
Case Study #!
Half a Pie of None
Pertaining to the question of Why doesn 't Mr. Green confront CEO Charles about gender stereotyping the Evaluator 's position? I feel Mr. Green understood that if he spoke to CEO Charles he would not make any head way on the issue of hiring a woman for the position . He made it perfectly clear he thought a man would be better suited for holding the position of evaluator, and would not allow any woman on his evaluation team. The CEO was stereotyping and felt it was in the best interest to hire a male for the job rather than a woman even if shes better qualified to do the work. I think Mr. Green knew that if Ms. Anderson was ever going to be promoted to the position she so well deserved he would have to help her to get there. If I was Mr. Green and made the decision to confront the CEO about stereotyping I would use a professional and positive manner to explain my position on the issue. I would provide him with the positive outcomes which would make it in the best interest of the company to hire the individual best qualified for the position. I think two specific suggestions that could be used for Mr. Green are to encourage the CEO of the company to understand that changes need to be made and his way of having preconceive notions was not going to help the company to flourish and prosper. Another suggestion I would give to the CEO would be to tell him to keep an open mind. A smart business man welcomes change and recognizes the competitive advantages of having the best qualified person for the job.
I think the level of sexual discrimination within the organization is changeable over time through
Half a Pie or None
Half a Pie or None, 3 internal interventions education, and positive communication within the company. I think the world changes around us everyday and if the company wants to stay competitive, maintain good work ethics, and etiquette, it must do what needs to
References: “Woman and work?Then and Now, Predicting The Future For Woman In the Workplace”.Healthfield, Susan M, 2015 Half Pie or None