A positive student leader is someone who is involved in the school and their main goal is to include everyone possible. They don’t reject anyone’s ideas, but they give them positive criticism. They don’t blow someone off just because they think that their ideas are bad, but they accept others including their ideas. They get things done in an efficient manner, and include others at the same time not judging them. When they don’t have an assigned task to get done, they look for things to get done. On the other hand, a negative student leader is someone who just sits around. They pretend like they are doing something, not caring about the task. They distract others from getting done, whether it be gossiping, providing negative input or comments, or just fooling around. They are always negative, stating that they hate the school or giving the class a negative reputation. They aren’t open to new ideas, and they don’t like meeting people or associating with people. They are a follower, and don’t like getting out of their comfort zone. They don’t take risks and are always judging others, which shows that they are insecure with themselves.
I believe that leadership traits are in one’s personality. The motivation of wanting to be a leader or become a better leader I think just comes naturally to one. I think to become a leader you have to be motivated and determined to improve things and make things better in general. One must be positive, always trying to look on the bright side of things. But at the same time, they must be rational and be real about things. I think that leadership can be taught to one, and we become a better leader from our mistakes. I think that seeing someone else lead positively can help us become a better leader, and working with others that have the same incisive look on things can make someone a better leader. Think that to be taught to become a leader you have to want to be one, and you can’t be negative about becoming a leader. For one to become one you have to be able to take someone’s criticism lightly and know that they are just trying to make you a better leader. To be taught the teacher has to be a good leader though, because someone can’t be taught how to become a better leader if the person influencing them is not the best leader. Overall, I think that leadership traits are in ones personality, but one can be taught how to improve their leadership skills if they have the motivation to do so.
I think that in teams and clubs people tend to gravitate toward negative leaders because it is easer to be negative rather than positive. For example, in an awkward situation it is easier to critique something and be negative, rather than be positive. I think that naturally negative thoughts and traits come easy to us, but to be a good leader you must try to naturally be positive. I think that in clubs/teams the few positive leaders have more of an impact. They stand out and some people may label them as “weird.” People who are the positive leaders or follow the positive leaders get the better experience out of the situation, but negative leaders can try to bring the group down. I think that once people realize the easy way out (being a negative leader) isn’t the best thing to do and they go with the positive leaders, then they find out that being the positive leaders you get the best experience that you will always remember. People remember the positive leaders rather than the negative, and positive leaders have a bigger impact on people individually. As a whole, negative leaders have a bigger impact on the team but the positive leaders have a larger impact on the individuals of the team.
The quote “the best leaders don’t always have the most friends” is true in a way, but it is not necessarily true. I think that the leaders that don’t have the most friends are the annoying leaders that people just get annoyed with. I also think that the best leaders that don’t have the...