Preview

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
After the Revolution of 1776, America had to transition itself from thirteen disjointed colonies to one unified nation. In 1777, the Articles of Confederation was drafted and submitted for the states’ approval. Out of thirteen states, only eight ratified the plan for a national government by 1778, while nearly three more years passed before the last state approved the Articles (Soomo Publications, 2015). Although the Articles of Confederation provided a system for the Continental Congress to direct the Revolutionary War, Congress felt the need for a stronger union with enough power to defeat Great Britain. The belief that a constitutional order must be fitting to its republican character was met with the fear of a central authority (HistoryEd, 2009). Such a fear may have potentially devastated the ability to adequately serve a considerable union like the United States. In response to this fear, Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton published essays in hopes of swaying the public opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution. The Federalist Papers are a collection of eighty-five articles written by Hamilton, as well as James Madison and John Jay, promoted ratifying the Constitution in hopes of creating a resilient, centralized government (Lutz, 1990). After months of deliberation at the Constitutional Convention in Pennsylvania, a Constitution was ratified and agreed upon by the states. …show more content…
The Constitution of the United States addresses the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation because it established the federal treasury, it is a product of careful consideration, and it compromises with the wants of anti-federalist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation delivered the United States with an operational government from 1781 to 1789. It was a model of what a loose Confederation should be. The Articles succeeded in maintaining the union of the thirteen states as well as clearly outlining the general powers of the centralized government. Yet, despite these positive deeds, there were many setbacks. One major setback was the weak government designed to prevent any future abuse of power. However, with all things that have come into play, good or bad, the Constitution that now shapes America would have never been formed without first evolving from the flawed Articles of Confederation. (Magleby)…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under the control of the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. Congress was a unicameral legislature that made laws. There were no executive or judiciary branches. Some of the weaknesses included that Congress can't pass laws unless nine states supported it, the Articles could not be amended unless all thirteen states approved it, Congress could not collect taxes, and they also could not raise an army. The seventh article states "When land forces are raised by any state, for the common defense, all officers of or under the rank of colonel, shall be appointed by the legislature of each state respectively by whom such forces shall be raised, or in such manner as such state shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American system of government following the end of the American Revolution was a disaster as far as the nation’s status as a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was nothing “unified” about the United States. The states stood in the union as individual bodies, with little to no ties to a seemingly non-existent central governing body or to the other states. This allowed the states to disregard other states’ laws and ultimately created disunion within the states. Because it has been proven that the states cannot stand alone and sufficiently govern themselves without a strong central government, the national government should be the supreme law of the land.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years 1781 to 1789, the years known as the "Critical period" were the reign of the Articles of Confederation... were those years a highlight in American history, or a Time that is best to be forgotten? The argument can go either way it really depends on how you look at it. The question is; were the Articles an effective system of government? Well, while something might not be effective it can still be very necessary, and important, to the future the way it is ran (government), In this essay both the weaknesses and the strengths of the Articles of Confederation will be given, you can make up your mind about the effectiveness of it. The way I feel is... The Articles of Confederation, while not entirely successful, were indeed a necessary stepping-stone to today's federalist government.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the face of the many weaknesses, there was potential strength in the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation allowed negotiation and the signing of treaties. One of the treaties was the Treaty of Paris, which negotiated Great Britain and North America to end the Revolutionary War. Without the negotiating of this treaty, the newly born United States wouldn't have international diplomacy against the immense and modern powers of other nations. With strength comes weakness. Under the Articles of Confederation, states were allowed to have their own currency.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Major domestic problems faced by the leaders of the republic under the Articles of Confederation was maintaining national security and creating a stable economic system. Maintaining national security was hard because the national government did not have the power to draft people into the army. The new country did not have an army therefore they were perceived as a weak nation. Many nations were waiting to invade the young country and claim the valuable land. The country also did not show unity. Each state was having disputes and the nation was on the edge of a civil war. An event like Shay’s rebellion destroyed unity and was a perfect example of the lack of stability shown by this country. Another problem faced by the leaders was economic stability. They did not have stability for many reasons. First, trading between states was very difficult because trade laws from state to state differed. Next, each state had its own currency. Money in New Jersey was worthless in Virginia. Finally, paper money in general was worthless because they didn’t have the gold to back the money. These are the major problems faced my leaders of the republic under the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout these few years, the lack of a central government seemed to be an overwhelming factor when it comes to the effectiveness of this document. A large fault in the Articles is the inability of Congress to create taxes and regulate trade. There is simply no way that a central government can survive without taxes. Also, since the government had no authority over the colonies, they could not force anyone to contribute to the overwhelming war debt caused by the American Revolution. And without their ability to control the colonies, there is no central government. Also, the difficulty to make amendments to the Articles made it almost impossible for anything new to be put into action. With so many different ideals coming from the different parts of the nation, the Articles lacked in that it called for a nine-state majority to make amendments. It seems nearly impractical to try and acquire nine completely different states to agree on one topic, seeing they came from different parts of the country, and thus, making Congress close to nothing. And finally, if the U.S. were to be attacked by Britain again at this time, there would be no way for them to defend themselves, seeing that Congress could only ask states for troops, but could not raise an army. This would have been catastrophic if another country had decided to attack the U.S. for any reason. To sum that up, the inability to create taxes and trade regulations, the difficulty to make amendments, and the inability to rise up an army contributed to the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Continental Congress assembled for a second time in July of 1775 and adopted the Declaration of Independence as their argument and explanation for splitting with Great Britain, one of the major concerns on the delegates' minds was the question: what government would be put in place to replace King George and Parliament (Articles)? The answer was finally put forward by John Dickinson and after two years of debate and revision the Articles of Confederation were ready to be approved (Johnson). The ratification process proved tediously slow however and Maryland, the last holdout, finally agreed to accept it in 1781 (Pageant). During the Revolution and in the peace negotiations directly after America's new government seemed rather effective, leading the former colonies in defeating the Redcoats and successfully negotiating peace terms at the treaty of Paris. This façade of efficient governance was lost however when the central government was unable to unify the American people, provide an effective means of defense against external and internal forces, or effectively rule.…

    • 802 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation held many problem that the people of the U.S. were angry about. With no Bill of Rights in the Articles of Confederation many people were angry that their rights were not protected by anything. Since the states had different currencies this also mde people in the U.S very angry because they could be rich in one state and in the other poor. As well as this making it so that the states couldn't trade. Lastly the government couldn’t tax the people making the United States poor and in heavy debt.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After a new Constitution, intended to replace the Articles of Confederation, it was agreed that it would go into effect when nine of the thirteen states had approved it in ratifying conventions. There ensued a nationwide debate over constitutional principles, and the press was overwhelmed with letters condemning or praising the documents. The three men chief among them Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a lliberal central government that would replace the states rights and on individual liberties. All strong nationalists argued that most important the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and together in the national interest.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A crucial point in American History came when the people of this country demanded change from the failures of the articles of Confederation. In modern times, Americans debate the issues of national or individual rights, and whether the constitution has address our concerns. Currently, I feel the constitution addresses national rights but not individual rights. One failure of the Articles of Confederation was that power was only given to central government. The money that produced within the articles didn’t hold the value and brought the economy down then it came apart. The second failure was that there was no proper taxation which means things were more difficult to maintain such as any form of central government. It also failed because they were too weak to form an effective central government.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States could not have survived if the Articles had stayed in effect. Congress did gain some control, and did some good deeds, but their control was too limited and they could not get along with the people. We wouldn't have the things we have now. It lacked power to control commerce. If we still had the articles and not the constitution the government would have more control over us then is does. There would have never been no unity. Although the articles set the United States free, it was unable to provide them with a solid government. There were a few problems within the Constitution of the United States of America, but the effects that it produced in society were far more positive than that of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays