Preview

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles of confederation allowed States to be independent while the federal government was overall a meeting place for all the state representatives to meet and debate new law. The federal government had laws in place but their were very hard to enforce. The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had no president. They instead had the Committee of the States which had one representative from each state. Even though that the Committee of the States was the most central form of the federal government, they had very little power to the Constitutional Congress. The Articles had many weaknesses that stunted the growth of the nation. First off, The articles had the inability to gain funds from its citizens. Congress could not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation provided a working government for the United States, it was not necessarily an effectively working government; an effective government would be one that not only establishes control and authority, but one under which the nation flourishes. Certainly the Articles set down a basic government with the idea of a democratic republic. However, the Articles of Confederation didn't impose an effective government as much as it set the basis for one. It was unable to enforce many laws and many of those set were also unequal in operation, as unfair to some states as fair to others. Thus, from 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation established a working, yet ineffective government, with very little control or authority over foreign relations, the economy, and western lands.…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regarding structure, the Articles of Confederation, or simply Articles, were relatively ‘bare-bones’ when compared to the complex constitutions and declarations of government other countries had. It laid out a simple and ultimately primitive government: the power of the government was to lie solely in Congress, a group of delegates from all states. It was to be Congress and only Congress to create laws and run most of the government. This concept did not work well in practice: Congress, the only branch of the government, was weak and unable to bring about policy change for the country. First, all amendments to the Articles required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states - something that was quite rare - and even the simplest of national laws required a two-thirds majority to be established. This became a major issue. As a new country, a lot of issues were going to come forth to Congress, and due to the bureaucratic rules that were in place, it was difficult for a treaty or policy to be approved. Furthermore, the Articles did…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was going through a time of great debates and dilemma’s. It became obvious that a better more powerful national government was necessary. The Articles of Confederation was weak and needed to be replaced. While this was occurring a major problem developed. This was between large states, which vied for legislature segmented by population, and smaller states which wanted the system to have equal portioned votes everywhere. The larger states suggested the Virginia Plan, and the small states proposed the New Jersey Plan. At first, this issue was at a stalemate and both sides refused to give up ground. Eventually, Oliver Ellsworth offered The Great Compromise. This called for a bicameral Legislature with proportional…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was approved in 1781. At that time was a loose confederation of states. The nation was less together each state was running like independent countries instead of being one whole nation. In that time the national government was small, it was only comprised of one single legislature. In the Congress of Confederation, there was no president, and there was no judicial branch. The Articles of Confederation gave power to the Congress to conduct war, regulate currency, and govern foreign affairs. However, in reality these power…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under the control of the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. Congress was a unicameral legislature that made laws. There were no executive or judiciary branches. Some of the weaknesses included that Congress can't pass laws unless nine states supported it, the Articles could not be amended unless all thirteen states approved it, Congress could not collect taxes, and they also could not raise an army. The seventh article states "When land forces are raised by any state, for the common defense, all officers of or under the rank of colonel, shall be appointed by the legislature of each state respectively by whom such forces shall be raised, or in such manner as such state shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American system of government following the end of the American Revolution was a disaster as far as the nation’s status as a union. Under the Articles of Confederation, there was nothing “unified” about the United States. The states stood in the union as individual bodies, with little to no ties to a seemingly non-existent central governing body or to the other states. This allowed the states to disregard other states’ laws and ultimately created disunion within the states. Because it has been proven that the states cannot stand alone and sufficiently govern themselves without a strong central government, the national government should be the supreme law of the land.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation served as a stepping stone to the United States Constitution, which was later to be written. There were no federal courts, no authority to act directly upon individuals, no power to coerce states, and there had to be unanimous approval of the states for an amendment to be put into action. Unfortunately, the people could not get any help from the government because of the fact that Congress had no power to regulate commerce and that the Articles of Confederation, due to different views, created foreign disputes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles were the first constitutional agreement made between the 13 American states. They kept the United States together long enough to realize unity. Its goal was to establish a written document of the functions of the national government after declaring independence from Great Britain. The Articles of Confederation were not successful for many reasons. It established a weak central government with no president. The government was ran by the thirteen individual states themselves. They controlled their own foreign policy. Another reason the Articles of Confederation were not successful was because they gave the national government no power of direct taxation. This was a bad decision because governments get their money from taxes. Without taxes, the government did not have any money and would not be able to run…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America had just recently gained independence from the British Empire and was now looking for a new form of government to help support their want for a new and fairer life. The Articles of Confederation provided the thirteen colonies with a new basic government and had many policies that also included items such as foreign policy and economics. They decided to create a new set of laws that congress would follow that would limit their power so they would not repeat the same events they had already experienced with Britain, this new set of laws was called, The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation have very valid and strong points in what they say and accomplish the task of offering a more fair lifestyle to the American people. The articles limited the government’s power and gave the people a chance to have a life free from tyranny like that one they experienced under the reign of the king of England.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agreed with your post this week given the fact that we took an almost identical way of describing and pointing out the weakness of the Articles of Confederation. An aspect that you covered by I missed was the issues of states not paying federal taxes. Without taxes being made it would not allowing funding for the government to function and create institutions necessary for a the states and country to survive. Yes, a huge part of the colonies reason to gaining their independence was British unfair taxes but the value that taxes had financial was missed. In cases of fear and angry we tend to make rational decision by way of irrational behavior and thought. This is not to say the colonies actions were irrational but just to acknowledge…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a primitive version of the current Constitution of the United States. Back in the 1700's all thirteen states approved the Articles of Confederation. The Articles served as the only way to keep the states unified. Though they were weak (most people were afraid of having a strong central government) they still helped in modeling the United States Constitution and helped in stabilizing the government. Although this is true, it would be ridiculous to try to prove that the Articles of the Confederation were an effective government, because the Confederation failed to act as an effective government in about every way possible. Most people look for the following characteristics to comprise an efficient government: the power to tax and use taxes, the ability to regulate trade, and the ability to unite its sections under one power. Although there were some strong steps taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country, The Articles of Confederation lacked most if not all of the characteristics necessary to be an effective government.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several flaws. First, it placed all governing power in a single legislature. This meant there was no separation of powers, but rather a "committee of the states" which allowed one representative from each of the thirteen states to be seated. The Continental Congress did still have some powers under the Articles of Confederation such as: the power to declare war and make peace; the power to make international treaties; the power to control Indian affairs in the West; the power to establish a currency; and the power to create and maintain a postal service.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays