Preview

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Animal Rights: Understanding Philosophy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
769 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strengths And Weaknesses Of Animal Rights: Understanding Philosophy
Animal Rights
PHI 208 Understanding Philosophy
June 1, 2014

According, to the animal right movement animals are equal to human in many ways than one, companionship, protector, and a medically alert animal. In recent years a number of oppressed groups have campaigned about Animals being equal to human. We should extend non-human rights to animals the same equality as a human is given the same consideration. Even, though the weakness of the utilitarian on animal and human rights is callous, the strength and the weakness of that theory is relation to the issue. The strength of the Utilitarian Peter Singer regarding animal rights, and utilitarianism are equalized. Although, …show more content…
Although the possible weakness of the Utilitarian on animals, and human rights. However, their strength and weakness of their theory is related to the issue. The two main reasons: First, the strength of the Utilitarian Peter Singer clarify-Kantian ethics is clear and easy to follow. It’s absolute deontological nature arguably the most easy to apply the good for their environment, business and sexual ethics. Any theory is easy to apply is very helpful and useable as well as reliable. The strength of the animal right movement is quite basic. The animal right movement can trace their roots to the antivivisection campaigns (Singer, 2013). The weakness of the Utilitarian on animal and human rights involves the Hedon machine, which states that we don’t actively pursue pleasure alone-this is a very primal and callous view of humanity (Jake, 2013). The animal right movement is a group of individual that is concern in protecting the animals from sustaining abuse and misusing in any way. Even, though the weakness of the utilitarian on animal and human rights is callous, and strength and the weakness of that theory is relation to the issue. But most importantly, is the Utilitarian is equalized. This leave the animal right movement opens to provide theoretical foundation with another new social movement about human –non-human …show more content…
Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition [serial online]. December 2013;:1. Available from: Literary Reference Center Plus, Ipswich, M. Accessed May 29, 2014.
Jakedoesrevision.bolgspot.com/2013/01/basic- strengths
Leo J. Singer’s final solution. U. S. News & World Report [serial online]. October 4, 1999; 127(13):17. Available from: Business Sources Elite, Ipswich, MA. Accessed My 29, 2014. Http:/library.ashford.edu/EzProxy.spx?url=http:/search.ebschost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,cpid&custid=s8856897&db=bsh&AN=2304206&site=ehost-live Mosser, K (2013). Understanding Philosophy. 6.1. San Diego, Ca; Bridgepoint Education
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer: Sentience vs Self-Conciousness
    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Peter Singer: Sentience vs Self-Conciousness

    More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal liberation today is analogous to the struggles for racial and gender justice of the past. (1976, p. 34-36) This essay will attempt to highlight the distinctions made by Singer between sentience and self-conciousness and what implications such a distinction suggests for the moral status of animals. Furthermore, this essay will attempt to identify and contrast the moral status of animals with that of human animals and identify the bases of such standing in ethical deliberation.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Flaws of Peter Singer's Arguments
    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Flaws of Peter Singer's Arguments

    In this essay, I’d like to argue against the general movement concerning animal rights. This movement aims to give animals more rights than is necessary. One of the main people who advocate this movement is Peter Singer. Singer uses many logical arguments that are reasoned and well thought out but are flawed and it will be very useful to show how the animal liberation movement is misguided and unrealistic.…

    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal

    Peter Singer and his philosophy have received a range of praise and criticism for his progressive views. Some have called him the most dangerous man in the world, while others consider him a hero in the teachings of morality and ethics. His detractors make mention of his views on Animal Equality, blasting his comparisons of modern man’s treatment of animals to that of; slavery the Holocaust, human suffering and infanticide. Singer’s essay, All Animals Are Equal, poses the argument that all sentiment beings are entitled to the most basic of dignities and consideration, no different than those considerations reserved for humans. Singer draws no line of distinction between our species and other species who we, as humans…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer’s Case for Animal Liberation Essay Example
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer’s Case for Animal Liberation Essay Example

    Peter Singer is Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and is considered one of the world’s most influential people. His book Animal Liberation (1975) is the most influential book written on the subject, having in a sense started the animal rights movement. Singer argues that animal liberation today is analogous to racial and gender justice in the past. Just as people once thought it incredible that women or blacks should be treated as equal to white men, so now speciesists mock the idea that all animals should be given equal consideration. What equalizes all sentient beings is our ability to suffer. In that, we and animals are equal and deserving equal consideration of interests. Singer’s argument is a utilitarian one, having as its goal the maximization of interest satisfaction.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argument Analysis: All Animals Are Equal
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argument Analysis: All Animals Are Equal

    In his article All Animals Are Equal, philosopher Peter Singer claims an argument for animal liberation. He concludes that other species deserve rights and interests as equal as human beings. He clarifies that his definition of “sentience” refers to the capacity of creatures to experience things like suffering and enjoyment or happiness. He suggests that the capable of sentience is the only plausible criterion of moral importance to makes his conclusion in a meaningful way (Singer, p.179). In this paper, I argue that the capability of sentience for beings is not the only criterion of moral importance to take in to account when advocate equal consideration of interests for all animals. The argument that I wish to focus on in my paper is the following:…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scruton Vs Peter Singer Essay
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scruton Vs Peter Singer Essay

    Roger Scruton and Peter Singer are two philosophers who have very different theories on animal rights and the relationships we have with them. I found points in both Scruton and Singer’s opinion that I agreed with, yet neither of them felt completely true to me. Singer speaks of an overall equality between beings based on their potential to feel and suffer, rather than cognitive ability. This theory prohibits any slaughter or consumption of animals. Scruton offers the notion of the many different mental capacities of beings, and the relationships we have with animals as basis for how we are all treated; he also suggests that we are all distinguished by these differences. I found my own belief concerning animal rights and equality to fall…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer: All Animals Are Equal
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter Singer: All Animals Are Equal

    Peter Singer, a Utilitarian, believes in the maximization of happiness of humans and extends this thought to the nonhuman inhabitants of Earth. Singer, believes that all animals should be granted moral status, similar to that of the human inhabitants. He presents his argument in a modus ponens form. His conclusion of, that nonhuman entities should be given the same amount of moral consideration as human entities is reached though his presentation of premises that if an entity can suffer, then its suffering must be given similar moral consideration to that of human entities. In Singer’s second premise he states that that nonhuman entities have the capability of suffering, therefore making his argument strong and valid.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Ethical Treatment of Animals
    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ethical Treatment of Animals

    human benefit. The utilitarian theory allows us to examine ethical choices and in contrast, relativism allows us to determine our course of action with ethical values. Moral equal theories extend equal consideration and moral status to animals. (Ethics & Social Responsibility-1.7) Denying moral status to animals may require not harming animals because by doing so can cause harm to a human being’s morality. The ethical treatment of animals should always be humane and morally right. Animals have the ability to feel pleasure, pain and suffering.…

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stephen Rose Proud To Be Speciesist Summary
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stephen Rose Proud To Be Speciesist Summary

    The use of animals for human benefits has always been a controversial topic. It is still unanswered whether the use of animals for human advantages is valid. Animal activists think that using animals for human advantages can never be good, whereas few researchers and scientists think that animals are necessary for human welfare. "Proud to be Speciesist" by Stephen Rose, talk about the issue of animal rights but present a totally contrasting viewpoints toward use of animals. The authors talk about using animals for human benefits in different approach. Rose's essay looks at a specific, personal view on the topic. Rose contradicts saying that human welfare and survival is more important than animal rights and argues that using animals for research is acceptable.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Arguments Against Animal Rights
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Arguments Against Animal Rights

    Every year, about millions of animals are killed by testing, hurt and injured by abuse, or left to fend for themselves in the world. All these listed are misconducts and corruptions that have shattered the lives of blameless creatures. Animals have become the resource for testing products and performing experiments. This has led to animals being molested, which has been the cause of many people’s outspoken opinions of vexation and anger. Many people have taken stands against this injustice to creatures and have impacted how animals are viewed and treated in this world, while others support animal testing. The movement of animal rights improves the lives of innocent animals and assists them from the mistreatment of abuse, testing, and experimentation.…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Liberation Essay Example
    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Liberation Essay Example

    Peter Singer addresses the ordeal of animal rights better than I have ever seen anyone address it. His analysis laid out in A Utilitarian Defense of Animal Liberation is remarkably stated. He pushes the viewer to see animals as equals to us. But in order for him to do this he must first redefine equality. I think that the over use of the word equality has been an enormous set back in the movement for animal rights. Obviously a dog is not physically equal to a human and it would be outlandish to state that a dog has equal mental ability to that of the average human. However, there are humans that have fewer mental capabilities than that of the average dog. We would not subject this human to product testing and research but we feel it is all right to place animals in this position. A general defense to this is that the human life matters more than that of an animal, but what allows us to make that judgment. Singer addresses this defense by comparing the inequality placed on species to that of the inequality placed on races and sexes, hence his term "speciesism".…

    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Treatment of Animals
    • 3202 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Ethical Treatment of Animals

    The issue of animal rights is a very complex issue. There are both the positive and negative sides, which seem to have major contradictions. Animal rights people propose that the basic interest of animals such as suffering avoidance should be accorded similar attention as give to human beings. One such organization is Peta.…

    • 3202 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights in India
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Rights in India

    Animal rights, also known as animal liberation, is the idea that the most basic interests of non-human animals should be afforded the same consideration as the similar interests of human beings. Advocates approach the issue from different philosophical positions, ranging from the protectionist side of the movement, presented by philosopher Peter Singer—with a utilitarian focus on suffering and consequences, rather than on the concept of rights—to the abolitionist side, represented by law professor Gary Francione, who argues that animals need only one right: the right not to be property. Despite the different approaches, advocates broadly agree that animals should be viewed as non-human persons and members of the moral community, and should not be used as food, clothing, research subjects, or entertainment.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics