Preview

Standford Prison Experiment Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
838 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Standford Prison Experiment Analysis
Naomi Withiam
Prof. Mehrinfar
English 1310-061
16 October 2017 Zimbardo's Experiment
In 1971, Zimbardo conducted an experiment which is known as The Standford Prison Experiment. It took place in the basement of a psychology department, which was constructed to feel like an actual prison, and the participants were paid to either choose the role as a prisoner or guard in attempt to gaining a better understanding of human interaction and its effect on human behavior. Zimbardo predicted that from this experiment that the goodness in people would overcome the evil. However, the results proved otherwise. Though some may disagree with Zimbardo's interpretation of his experiment, it revealed that man's nature is evil because of their environment,
…show more content…
For example, Tzu stated that "Whatever a man lacks in himself he will seek outside. But if a man is already rich, will not long for wealth, and if he is already eminent, he will not long for greater power. What a man already possesses in himself he will not bother to look for outside." (87). Just like in the experiment, the guards were capable of being tyrants which is why they changed their demeanor for their roles as authoritarian figures. For instance, the guards started practicing sadism by abusing their authority and using aggressive, demeaning language towards the prisoners. In addition to this, they began using brutality such as forcing them to do excessive excercises like scrubbing toilets in the middle of the night to prove their superiority to the prisoners. This portrayed how they lost their true sense of identity by fulfilling their new persona. The uniform's they wore, such as the sunglasses, also increased the sensibility that they lacked humanity and empathy. As for the inmates, they got to experience what it was like being institutionalized in an oppressive prison-like setting by which resulted in them to partake in abnormal behavior as well. Imprisonment and captivity caused them to become obedient and submissive towards the guards as they simulated to prison-life where they were humiliated and dehumanized …show more content…
Tzu states that, "any man who follows his nature and indulges his emotions will inevitably become involved in wrangling and strife, will violate the forms and rules of society, and will end as a criminal" (85). For example, Prisoner 8612 decided to barricade himself using his bed which he later was put in "the hole", which is solitary confinement, as a form of punishment. Later he urged Zimbardo to let him leave due to mental illness after having uncontrollable bursts and showing signs of emotional distress. This resulted in him terminating the experiment, allowing Zimbardo to benefit from his theory on human behavior. Whereas Prisoner 416 went on a hunger strike as a form of protest and as a result of this, it caused confrontation between him and the guards. Prisoner 416 later stated after the experiment in an interview with the guard who tormented him that, "It let me on some knowledge that I never experienced before first hand. Because I know what you can turn into, I know what you're willing to do." This reflection confirms the idea that people readily conform to the social roles they play in an environment and are forced to adapt, regardless of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first impression from watching the film was the relationship between the study’s prisoners and guards seemed friendly at first. Though they’re encouraged by Zimbardo and his associates to take the experiment seriously and to invest themselves fully in their roles, the subjects initially still understand that they’re not really in a prison but then, the experiment takes a turn when a guard named Christopher Archer begins to embrace a meaner personality one, in which I suspect from watching the experiment, is not his normal demeanor but, rather, a more boosted version of himself of which he perceives to be his role. Archer introduces an element of meanness to the proceedings, altering the prisoners’ mindset the prisoners start to feel dehumanization…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Control of the experience was quickly lost. The prisoners have suffered - and accepted - treatment humiliating and sometimes sadistic on the part of the guards, and in the end many of them suffered from a severe emotional disturbance.Experience…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Qlt1 Task 1

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages

    He gave them each a psychological examination in order to establish normality. The participants were then randomly selected to be either guards or prisoners; the environment was kept as true to life as possible including ‘prisoners’ being arrested unknowingly at home. Zimbardo became the Governor. The experiment was to last 2 weeks but was prematurely ended after 6 days due to emotional distress of the…

    • 2535 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the experiments is the Stanford University prison experiment. This experiment was performed by Philip Zimbardo and a group of scientists wanted to see how normal people would act once they were put into a prison environment for two weeks whether they are a guard or a prisoner. The experiment was cut down to 6 days because of the information that the scientist discovered. Gladwell exclaimed “What Zimbardo found out shocked him. The guards, some whole previously identified themselves as pacifists, fell quickly into the role of hard-bitten disciplinarians” (Gladwell 158). Both the prisoners and the guards lost their identities and were reforming to the lifestyle and beliefs of actual prisoners and prison guards. The “prisoners” actually felt like they were in prison and became emotionally distraught and the guards became strict disciplinarians and lost their morals. When the people were put into the environment of a prison, they reverted from their morals and even led to them changing. Stout talks about this epidemic as well, she says “All human beings have the capacity to dissociate psychologically, though most of us are unaware of this, and consider “out-of-body” episodes to be far beyond the boundaries of our normal experience. In fact, dissociative experiences happen to everyone, and most of these events are quite…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those involved had forgotten they were playing a role. The prisoners were "behaving in pathological ways" and no longer realized that they were free to quit at anytime (Zimbardo, 2006). The guards had either become sadistic or allowed the behavior, believing that they were unable to do anything about it; and as previously stated, even the researchers playing a role had begun to lose their grip on reality (Zimbardo, 2006). This experiment showed just how detrimental inhumane prison conditions were to the health of everyone in the prison system from Super-Intendents to guards and prisoners.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zimbardo’s experiment, he had two different groups of people, the prisoners and the guards. Zimbardo’s experiment was considered to be a mock prison in the basement of…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays