As described by Bob Peterson and Monty Neill, these types of assessments include portfolio-based results which include all of the records, progress, and achievements the student has received during their school years. It also includes any records or comments kept by the student’s teacher and collections of the student’s work (Peterson, Neill, para. 1). But portfolio-based assessments don’t provide any information on why they may have gotten those scores and records. If the student seems to not do so well, the assessment leaves it at that, and doesn’t straighten out facts on what may be causing the student to do so poorly. So, these types of assessments, like standardized testing, have no method of finding out what the student could possible be facing during those past years. It’s just like a waste of collecting data of what the student has learned during their years in school as opposed to collecting data that could affect on how the student got those scores in the past years in …show more content…
Standardized testing originally failed in order to hopefully help a student with a disability prepare for the future careers that they dreamed to have. But with edits to the original test that help compensate with the student’s problems that they’re facing, the student would then be able to take the test in a way that feels right to them. Those changes to the standardized test work for the student, because it helps them out with what they weren’t able to like an average student would and it makes the student feel like they can take this test. All they need is a little help with what they are facing. They make the student tell the world, “I’m not like a lot of people, but that’s okay. I can make it, and I will be