Preview

Squatter (Popular) Sovereignty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
112 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Squatter (Popular) Sovereignty
When Polk died just three months after leaving office, Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan took his place. To maintain the one party unity on the issue of slavery, Cass proposed a new idea, squatter (popular) sovereignty. Under this concept, Congress would allow the settlers in each territory the right to determine their status as a free or slave territory. Sadly, Cass’s plan of squatter sovereignty failed to persuade the northern democrats because they joined the Free-Soil Party which prohibited the expansion of slavery in the western territories. Squatter (popular) sovereignty was important because without it, the rights and liberties of the citizens in the US wouldn’t be fully protected by federal measures.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    CHAPTER 18: RENEWING THE SECTIONAL STRUGGLE The Popular Sovereignty Panacea Know: Mexican Cession, Fire-eaters 29. What were the advantages and disadvantages of popular sovereignty? Political Triumphs for General Taylor 30. Why was the Free-Soil party formed?…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Lewis Cass – veteran of War of 1812, Democratic party, but supported popular sovereignty…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: Both Jacksonian economic policy and westward movement in America were indicative of the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840. It was in this antebellum era that the United States, with economic and sectional changes, made effects to comply democratic politics and make changes should the country’s founding philosophy be led astray.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constraint: Northern states opinion on anti-slavery, the time frame of the speech and how he gave the speech.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were several ways calling for the abolition of slavery in western territory, such as; the Northwest Ordinance and the Missouri Compromise (604). People were getting exhausted dealing with the human’s right abuse through the existence of slavery. Through the establishment of free soil in new territories, people implicitly denied the slaves states existence and label it as the new political party (604). To support the establishment of free soil, several major groups were raised up, such as; rebellious northern Democrats, anti-slavery Whigs, and members of the Liberty party formed in 1840 (604). The Californians in advance before their new President Zachary Taylor regulate anything, also had put a Free State government into their territory even without prior consulting with Congress (608).…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiiyguftfkv

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question: How did this Democratic victory help to undermine Congress’ effort to help the freedmen?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to the Missouri Compromise in 1820, the biggest fear was that slave-owning southerners would hold control in congress, having a drastically larger share of votes in the senate as well as the house. Although “abolitionists were one of the most outspoken groups in the United States, and they vehemently denounced the war” (Newman, 1) Whigs and pacifists were involved in the campaign against the war. Whig senator William Cabell Rives described what many other believed of the war, emphasizing that the US did not have the right to “interfere with the institutions of other countries' and maintained that other people in other countries should be free to pursue their own happiness and destiny, just as we are able to enjoy these pursuits without interference.” Whigs and pacifists strongly believed that to “extend the limits of empire by violence and conquest is a low and discredited ambition; but to extend the moral empire is an ambition worthy of the age and worthy of America.” Clearly the fact that the U.S. first acted and invaded Mexico’s land was essential in the opposing side’s…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Calhoun believed Jefferson had been influenced by these principles of inalienable rights. As a result, according to Calhoun, Natural law “…caused him to take an utterly false view of the subordinate relationship of the black to the white race” (Calhoun, Oregon Bill, 1948). In particular he blamed Jefferson for the application of natural liberty to national policies of westward expansion. He criticized Jefferson for authoring the North West Ordinance which banned slavery in the Ohio territories which Calhoun saw as a byproduct of his subscription to natural rights. “To this political error, his proposition to exclude slavery from territory northwest of the Ohio may be traced…and through it the deep and dangerous agitation which now threatens to engulf [the nation]…”(Calhoun, Oregon Bill, 1948). Calhoun attributed the North West Ordinance as setting a national precedent for the exclusion of slavery in northern territories. Consequently this precedent then impacted the tradition of admitting new states formed by the Missouri Compromise and led to antislavery provision in the Oregon Bill. In Calhoun’s view preventing the extension of slavery and encouraging natural rights would disrupt the political order and lead to anarchy. To illustrate his point he argued that events like the French…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 19th century, America was undergoing significant social reform, resulting in many different definitions of American freedom. To Henry Clay, a famous senator, American freedom meant liberty for all people, including slaves, and he also cared deeply about American unity. These beliefs led Clay to condemn slavery, and to also be a strong supporter of the Whig party, as unity was a very important value in their ideology. Another notable figure in the 19th century, Denmark Vesey was also in favor of abolishing slavery, but fought for his definition of American freedom in a very different way. Comparing these characters from the 19th century depicts the numerous interpretations of American freedom as well as the various ways to defend those…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With drama now rumbling in the American underbellies, the small weight of anything slightly bad could set off a secession bomb. A freesoiler does not want to spread slavery, but he is okay with keeping it in a state it is already in. When the idea of popular sovereignty came about with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A), those freesoilers in office were pushed harder…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Democrat and Republican parties of the late 1800’s had a parallel belief that it was giving a voice to its constituents. The Republicans and Democrats fought over political corruption, civil rights, reconstruction, immigration, and States’ rights. Republicans appealed to the Union, Border States, and African Americans. The South had to be rebuilt, but giving power to the Southern whites was not an option at any time. Lincoln’s 10% Reconstruction plan would swiftly allow seceded states back into the Union, but Congress did not agree with this plan and in response they came up with the Wade-Davis Bill. The passing of this bill revealed some conflicts between Congress and…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorist come in many forms and groups around the world. They could foreign or domestic born. They believe in their cause and consider their actions are just. A quick definition of sovereign state is that they govern themselves without any foreign power. The beginning of the Sovereign Citizen group could maybe be traced back when William Gale in the 1970”s when he developed a group called the Posse Comitatus a Christian identity group or just another hate group blaming everything on the Jews and all non-whites for the wrong things going on in the country every time. A brief history about Mr. Gale was he served in WW II with General MacArthur. After all, he formed a group was a pastor for the Christian Identity and also Founder of the…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant, however, came from a “self-reliant” background of “privileges each man had won for himself.” “He had come up the hard way, and embodied nothing in particular except the eternal toughness and sinewy fiber of the men who grew up beyond the mountains.” Grant would have done anything to save the Union; he saw his fate in terms of the nation’s own destiny. “What he lived by would survive or fall with the nation itself.” He and people alike were always looking into the future. “They stood for democracy, not for a reasoned conclusion about the proper ordering of human society, but simply because they had grown up in the middle of democracy and knew how it worked.”…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Popular Sovereignty is an idea that the United States of America Government is created upon the all of the will of its people, all its citizens to be exact. Popular Sovereignty is a belief that the U.S government was brought up with the consent of its people, since they, the citizens were the one who help the ultimate power of all politics.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays