Preview

Solutions for case studies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2721 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Solutions for case studies
The Elements of Torts Torts and the Legal System Business and Torts Intentional Negligent Without fault (strict liability) For a business, torts come about in three ways A person is harmed by the actions of a business or its employees A person is harmed by a product manufactured or distributed by the business or A business is harmed by the wrongful actions of another business or person Role of Tort Law While most criminal acts, especially violent ones, involve a tort, most torts do not involve a criminal act Private law To place an injured party as nearly as possible in the position he would have occupied had it not been for the defendants tort. Punitive damages May be available for intentional torts To punish financially and deter others Torts Based on Negligence To recover a plaintiff must show the following four elements Duty Breach of duty Causation Injury. Negligence is an act or omission that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care A person who intentionally runs over another while driving has committed the intentional tort of battery A person who unintentionally (negligently) runs over another while driving carelessly has committed a tort of battery based on negligence Duty of Care The reasonable person standard The law does not require perfection, only what is reasonable under the circumstances In the case of a professional such as a doctor, engineer or accountant, that standard is a reasonable doctor, engineer or accountant. SQUISH LA FISH v. THOMCO Issue Did the defendant fail to take reasonable care that the information it provided was correct Squish hired ProPack who brought in Thomco. ProPack and Squish relied on Thomcos advice which was not particularly good. The Thomco representative stated that the adhesive would wash off in warm water. It did not and the distributor cancelled the contract with Squish. Negligent misrepresentation The trial court granted summary judgment for Thomco and Squish

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Medical Malpractice

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Meiners, Ringleb, and Edwards. "Chapter 6: Elements of Torts." The Legal Environment of Business. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2008. 150. Print.…

    • 5400 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    TORT - A Tort is a civil wrong that is outside of Contract Law and arises out of a recognition that a person is responsible for their acts and omissions when dealing with others. The term "Tort" refers to a number of different laws such as nuisance, trespass and assault. Torts action generally compensates the individual for personal loss where the loss was caused by another person. It is based on Common Law.…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Analysis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Officer Smith did have reasonable suspicion to make the initial vehicle stop. The taillight appeared to have been broken and there was colored tape so there was probable cause to pull the driver over. Police Officers may pull a vehicle over for many reasons like traffic violations, equipment violations and even suspicious activity whenever they have a reasonable articulable suspicion that a public offense is occurring or has occurred.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch 9-11 notes

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil (Tort) Law (p. 268)—law that concerns itself with private, individual harms and objective responsibility, focused mainly on compensating an individual party for measurable harm suffered.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LLC Operating Agreement

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under the theory of negligence the injured party must prove the following: duty, breach, causation and damages. Must prove that the defendant had the duty in which case owes the plaintiff for something. Second, that the defendant breached the legal duty to behave or failing to behave a certain way. Third causation, meaning that a defendant actions have caused injuries to the plaintiff. Lastly damages meaning that the plaintiff as suffered injuries because of the defendants action or inaction. (findlaw.com)…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Analysis

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case of Honig v. Doe, it was the first case to reach the Supreme Court dealing with discipline of special education students. This case took place in 1988 after two students from the San Francisco School District with emotional disabilities and aggressive tendencies were threatened with expulsion. John Doe (a pseudonym) was a socially and physically awkward 17 year-old who had difficulty controlling his impulses and anger. From early on in school, physical abnormalities, speech difficulties, and poor grooming habits resulted in his being the target of classmates teasing and ridiculing him. One day, in response to taunts from a fellow student at a developmental center for disabled students, he reacted in an explosive manner anticipated by his individualized education (IEP). He choked a student with enough force to leave abrasions on the boy’s neck. Afterwards, while being taken to the principal’s office, John kicked out a window. John was suspended from school for 5 days. The principal recommended that he be expelled. A lawsuit was filed, and the federal district court issued a temporary order directing the school to return John to his then current educational placement.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A tort is a civil wrong that is not a breach of a contract. Tort cases and treatises identify different types of wrongfulness, culpability, or fault and define them in varying ways. ort law contemplates civil liability for those who commit torts. This distinguishes it from the criminal law, which also involves wrongful behavior (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt, 2010). These laws have been modified many times since the late 1800 's by state legislatures and these changes have given plaintiffs more chance of success when bringing forth their claims. Original tort law included coverage for injuries suffered while in the workplace, but this…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torts can fall under 3 categories intentional torts, negligent torts, and strict liability. Intentional torts include intentionally hitting someone, negligent torts causing a traffic accident, and strict liability, making and selling defective merchandise. Tort law also includes the areas of nuisance, defamation, invasion of privacy and economic torts.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Field Interview

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort liability – lawsuits may result from the harm/damage you cause to other persons or property…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five elements are required to establish a prima facie case of negligence: the existence of a legal duty to exercise reasonable care; a failure to exercise reasonable care; cause in fact of physical harm by the negligent conduct; physical harm in the form of actual damages; and proximate cause, a showing that the harm is within the scope of liability. Negligence is an actionable tort. This means that if one person's carelessness causes another personal injury, the injured party may sue to recover damages (money) for his or her injuries. The idea that a person can sue for negligence is a relatively new phenomenon, only about a century old.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torts Went Wrong

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As we have already learned in class, a tort is a form of wrongful action that brings or causes harm to someone else that can lead to a lawsuit. Some torts are intentional, negligent, or strict liability. If you were intentionality trying to hurt someone or you were being reckless, you weren’t not making safe and conscious actions that only affect you. There are many different forms of intentional torts that are committed every day and there are consequences for those actions.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts Notes

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * INTRODUCED Civil Law (Wrongs Act 2002). Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Personal Injury (Liabilities and damages) NT.…

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays