Preview

Socrates Discussion Of Meno

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Discussion Of Meno
In the following I will summarize Socrates' discussion with Meno: To enjoy fine things and to have power, A tag from an unknown writer. At the end of the day, Meno has depended on an outer power, as opposed to his own particular considering. Desiring something good, aren’t they a hazardous passage, particularly on the grounds that there is a clear inconsistency between asserting that individuals don't want something bad, and guaranteeing that what they want is actually bad. The arrangement is to understand that individuals need things under a certain portrayal. Desiring bad things and getting them, Socrates is teasing Meno with a procurement of his case that excellence is desiring fine things and being able to secure for one self. In any case, …show more content…
“it’s not they’re desiring something bad; they desire what they take to be good, even though in actual fact it’s bad” Socrates is after the definitive characteristics of bad as it relates to being good. Lack of awareness is bad habit as expressed by Socrates' conviction that bad can just come from not recognizing what the correct thing would have been; the choice that drove a man to pick the wrong over the right activity more likely than not been under the wrong suspicion that the bad was really the best thing to do. In the event that a man knows the great, he or she can't act generally than this since he or she realizes that in the long run, picking the "bad" will prompt despondency in his or her life which is, as seen above, attractive to …show more content…
However, our customary thinking rightly expects more from such individuals than insignificant great expectations, since for example reckless individuals can be good natured yet may be blameworthy of carelessness of the most noticeably bad sort. If excellence is to acquire good things justly, and if justice is a kind of excellence, Meno has simply repeated his previous mistake of using kinds of excellence to define excellence itself. Socrates' clarification sets up that when he and Meno talk about people seeking bad things, they mean individuals who desire to get bad things. In this manner Socrates can ask Meno once more, in this more exact way, whether individuals can desire to get bad things in instances of both obliviousness and learning. To this more exact inquiry, Meno emphasizes that both cases are conceivable “There are some who desire to get bad things thinking that bad things are beneficial, and others as well, who desire to get bad things knowing that bad things cause harm.”(77d) Socrates continues to contend that both cases – lack of awareness and learning –are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates beforehand disproving Gorgias and Polus in The Gorgias, now takes on a rival who he deems qualified enough: Callicles. Here, they discuss the value of temperance and the indulgence of pleasures. Callicles remarks to Socrates, “In the rightly-developed man the passions ought not to be controlled, but that we should let them grow to the upmost and somehow or other satisfy them, and that that is virtue” (Plato 74). Callicles says that to allow growth and indulge in your desires is real virtue. A man who is slave of his own restraint cannot be happy. According to him, satisfying longings is natural and even noble, but because the weaker cannot attain this and are ashamed of their own weakness, they reprimand intemperance and instead praise…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In any branch of knowledge or ignorance, do you think that a knowledgeable person would intentionally try to outdo other knowledgeable people…”. (350a) Socrates asks Thrasymachus this question in hopes to weaken Thrasymachus’s argument by concluding that the unjust man is really just bad and ignorant.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book seven, Socrates presents the most famous and excellent metaphor of the allegory of the cave. This metaphor is meant to explain the effects of education on the human soul. Education moves the philosopher via the phases on the divided line, and eventually brings him to the form of the good .The objective of education is to drag every man as far out of the cave as possible. Education should not target at placing knowledge into the soul, but aim at turning the soul toward right wishes. Socrates continues with the analogy between mind and sight and explains that the vision of a clever but wicked man might be as sharp to equal that of a philosopher. The problem is in what he focuses his sharp vision toward. The common aim of the city is to educate people so as to later turn their mind in relation with the form of being good. Once this is achieved, these people should not remain examining the form of the good forever but they should go back into the cave to…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    First of all, Meno demonstrates Socrates's effort to guide his interlocutor to achieve thorough understanding of virtue and what his interlocutor actually received. Socrates's questioner is Meno, who is a young man trying to engage in unethical military and political affairs. Very well absorbed in his aristocratic origin, Meno also has a fierce pride in the ideas on virtue that he acquired from Gorgias, a sophist who focuses on the teaching of rhetoric and the external representation of knowledge. Meno started the conversation with a burning question: "Can you tell me, Socrates, can virtue be taught?" (Meno, 70a)…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If Meno were a Know-It-All on the subject of virtue, according to Meno’s paradox, Socrates’ questions should not have impacted him at all, and yet he seems impacted. The possibility that Meno superficially, not totally, understands the concept of virtue, is not a possibility for which Meno’s paradox allows. Socrates’ questions, then, move Meno from confident knowledge to a recognition of his own limitations, a movement which should not have been possible were Meno’s paradox valid. Additionally, Meno’s continued participation in the dialogue suggests an intellectual surrender of his paradox since his participation implies an investment in adding to his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Midterm Paper Being compared to a torpedo fish may seem like an insult, but in Socrates’ case, it is nothing but a compliment because of the actions behind it. Socrates is known for his questioning and critical thinking abilities that might give him this nickname. Meno, frustrated by Socrates extreme questioning, says, “Indeed if a joke is in order, you seem, in appearance and in every other way, to be like the broad torpedo fish, for it too makes anyone who comes close and touches it feel numb, and now you seem to have had that kind of effect on me, for both my mind and my tongue are numb, and I have no answer to give you.” (Plato 81).…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates is a well know philosopher, who has given his opinion in many topics including the one about evil. Socrate's perspective on the nature of human evil is that morality is a term that refers to the creation of and to follow the rules that govern human behavior on the basis of some idea of right and wrong. Even though you might have a different concept of morality, to him it must help humans to be able to tell wrong from right. Socrates believed that nobody chooses to do wrong knowing that they are doing the wrong thing. He has always thought that if you do wrong somehow you are doing something harmful to yourself and that no one ever has wanted to hurt themselves in no way. To him because people are ignorant, is the reason why they do the wrong thing instead of the right thing. This means that it is impossible for a…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with this theory. For Socrates, the key to a virtuous life was knowledge of the GOOD. He believed, if one knew the Good one would choose it. One always chooses the best of the options available. The question is what is the Good? He would say, evil is the result of ignorance, and that Wrong doing is involuntary. Evil doers must be educated, instructed as to what truly is the GOOD and then they will choose it. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it. We always choose what we think is the best or good for us. So, if someone chooses to do what we think is wrong, then that person made a mistake and must be educated to see the error. They mistook evil for the GOOD. But, I believe that there are many people that do commit evil doings, while truly knowing that they are in fact evil. Again, Socrates would indeed argue that these poor souls were somehow shown that these ways were the right ways or the “good” ways. I would love to believe that there is no evil in the world. But, I believe that there is evil within all of us, but it only comes out if we allow it.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates questioned the poets, the poets believed that they had the ability to speak brilliantly about various issues. However, Socrates revealed that although they each wrote amazing works of art, their intelligence did not come from wisdom, but instead, came from an impulse which wasn’t associated with their genius. As Socrates interrogated the craftsmen, he seemed to find men who genuinely contained much wisdom in their craft, but the men thought that their abilities in a certain field granted them to speak officially in other fields that they were associated with, although they truly knew nothing. Each case shows that Socrates confirmed that he would prefer to be as he is, stating that he truly knows nothing, rather than to be filled with a false impression of his own wisdom. Socrates states, “So I asked myself on behalf of the oracle whether I would prefer to be as I am, being in no way wise in their wisdom or ignorant in their ignorance, or to have both things that they have. I answered myself and the oracle that it profits me to be just as I am”…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He believed that people based their happiness on how well they acted according to human reason. This means that if someone knows what is the right thing to do, they will do it because it will result in their own satisfaction. Characters in a movie may do something because they feel the need to comply with human reason, and do the right thing. However, this philosophical idea may not make all movies good. For example, a good movie in the horror genre may show things that completely go against good human reason. For this reason, Socrates’ beliefs can only determine how good a movie is if the movie is in a suitable…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics