Preview

socialcontract

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
346 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
socialcontract
Jean Rousseau: The Social Contract

"Man is born free and everywhere he is in chains." The opening sentence of Rousseau's The Social Contract not only summarizes his entire philosophical system, it also proves how important he still is today. Rousseau explains how man went from this state of autonomy to the modern condition, dominated by inequality, dependency, violence and unhappiness. There were positive aspects to this process too, he admits, including the creation of families, the discovery of tools and technology, and the building of cities and social organizations. Unfortunately, this also gives way to what Rousseau called the "right of the strongest", where a reign of inequality destroys man's original state of happiness and freedom. Humanity becomes alienated, and the Discourse on Inequality ends unhappily in general war. The Social Contract is an attempt to find a solution to this problem. For Rousseau, because of man's "perfectibility", the passage from a natural state to a social one is both an accident and necessary. Unlike animals, men are programmed to create and progress from one condition to the next. Rousseau discovers a way men can associate themselves with each other while maintaining their own individual freedom inside a social and political organization. He calls that concept the "general will". Simply put, it is a form of association in which an individual alienates himself completely to the general will, and therefore regains his freedom in a political form. All of Rousseau's philosophy is an attempt to find a solution to the problem of alienation. For Rousseau, the only thing that made humans different from animals is his free will, something constantly placed in danger whenever man enters into society. Rousseau understood that the general will, or the will of the people, should be sovereign – and that is the catch. It is here where we regain our freedom inside social organization. Only the general will – general interest as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau concludes that the progression of the sciences and arts are the cause of the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his writing career.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau describes the conception of inequality in A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by asserting, “there is hardly any inequality in the state of nature, all inequality which now prevails owes its strength and growth to the development of our facilities and the advance of the human mind…” (Rousseau, p. 116). Within the state of nature, Rousseau explains “equality might have been sustained, had the talents of individuals been equal…but, as there was nothing to preserve this balance, it was soon distributed…” (Rousseau, p. 94). Eventually, property rights “gave rise to the first rules of justice…” (Rousseau, p. 94) and “[man] perpetually employed in getting others to interest themselves in his lot…[and] find their advantage in promoting his own” (Rousseau, p. 95-96). He further explains that this inequality is made “permanent and legitimate by the establishment of property and laws.” (Rousseau, p. 116). Rousseau contends that the rich in society began to…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, Hobbes imagines the state of nature as what would result if humans were free from laws and societal expectations, a conception which has latent problems. Conceiving of the state of nature in this way predisposes Hobbes to imagine simply taking already-socialized human beings and freeing them of the constraints of civil society and the force of authority. In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau argues that Hobbes, and other political theorists, have not removed the effects of society from their conceptions of natural man. Rousseau writes that his objective involves “separating what he [man] derives from his own wherewithal from what circumstances and his progress have added to or changed in his primitive state”…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We need to come together and demonstrate Rousseau’s, Social Contract. Rousseau believes we need to stop making decisions based on our own needs and think about…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau says, “Man is born free, and yet we see him everywhere in chains” (p. 458). In your own words, explain what he meant. Do you agree with Rousseau? Does his claim apply to todays society? Defend your answer, then discuss why you chose this topic.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I have freedom,” you say? Do you really? Perhaps, in some ways, you do. But in the end, you’re just another puppet being controlled by invisible strings whether you know it or not. “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains,” Jean-Jacques Rousseau once said. In society, man is “chained” and controlled by the government, by pressure of conforming to the social norms, by wealth and social class, and by one’s desires and emotions. Prior to birth, man is not restricted by such factors but that is merely a fleeting moment as he is slowly exposed to more and more of the world. I agree that “everywhere [man] is in chains,” but on the contrary, I believe man is already chained from the start—that man is never free. In the novel, Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, babies are “decanted” and conditioned to play out their predestined roles in the World State. As early as the embryonic stage, babies-to-be already have their fates determined for them. In addition to conditioning, a drug called soma that induces a false sense of happiness dominates these people’s lives. As long as there is society, there will be shackles.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau came to the conclusion that the best way to examine the inequality in society is to examine the beginning of mankind itself. He tried to imagine the early state of man assuming there was ever actually a state where man existed only with the nature, in a solitary, and primitive lifestyle. He did not however revert as far back to the idea of the Neanderthal man to examine the ideas man held and where they came from. Instead, he looked at a state where man looked, and seemed to have the same physical abilities as he does today. Rousseau also concedes that a time where the ideas of government, ownership, justice, and injustice did not exist may not have ever existed. If what many religions tell us is true, then, in mans beginning, he was from the start, handed down laws from god which would influence his thinking and decisions. Through this, the only way such a period could come about would have to be through some catastrophic event, which would not only be impossible to explain, but consequently, impossible to prove. Therefore, imagining this state could prove not only embarrassing, but would be a contradiction to the Holy Scriptures.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He wrote “From the cultivation of land, there is necessarily followed the division of land; and from property once recognized, the first rules of justice” (Rousseau 52) and that inequality “derives its force and growth from the development of our faculties and the progress of the human mind, and eventually becomes stable and legitimate through the establishment of property and laws” (Rousseau 70). Rousseau believed that it is the establishment of a civil society that produced moral inequality, where there are differences in wealth, power, status or class. While the creation and the implementation of law is meant to secure the rights of the people and protect them from political domination, it can be exploited entirely and resulted in the subjugation of the people who are not in power. This is apparent in the current judicial system of the United States, where African Americans and Latinos are unjustly targeted and incarcerated just for belonging to certain demographics that is stereotyped as violent, criminal and…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man never progresses because he lacks the ability to solve problems. By taking step aback, Rousseau is not assuming that humans were once solitary, whereas in Hobbes’ version, people did have social interaction, but only government was absent. However, in absence of reason, humans do have emotions like pity, which helps them live in harmony. With everything well balanced, savages are happy within themselves, making inequality hardly noticeable. Even though he thinks that the state of nature never existed and never will, Rousseau’s preference for the savage human over civilized human is fascinating because this implies that Rousseau does not want the humans to develop. However, when we look at the modern society, humans are oppressed at every moment in contrast to the state of nature. Today, as Lincoln said, democracy is defined as for the people, by the people and of the people. Is the power really in people’s hands? Or are they politically enslaved by the leaders they voted to represent them? As Rousseau says, laws are just made by the rich, here political leaders, to secure their power and position, keeping the weak, the citizens, in the illusion of…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right Thing Theory

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My personal views coincide with those of the author for this week’s essay prompt, who praises the practicality of Locke’s theories while renouncing the overtly idealistic ones of Rousseau. I agree with the author’s analysis that Locke’s theory holds more merit and is more persuasive than Rousseau’s. The author of the excerpt makes a compelling argument that Rousseau’s theory of human nature is naive and not applicable to reality. Rousseau's theories are inapplicable to reality because they are far too idealistic and fail to acknowledge the self-interested aspect of human nature. The argument from the essay prompt is a strong analysis of the philosophers because it effectively uses a personal anecdote to support Locke’s theory that a desire…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He wants people to be good citizens by actively participating in their political arena. Rousseau celebrates a democracy that stresses public duties over private rights, celebrates sacrifice for the common good, has a strong sense of community, and promotes certain virtues. He believes that these things are required in a state for it to flourish. This is done when the people collectively come together as one (sovereign) to pass laws for the common good of everyone. This type of participation defines not only their government and politics but also their freedoms, and individual limits. For example, Rousseau believes that “the right each private individual has to his own resources is always subordinate to the right the community has over everyone, without which there would be neither solidity in the social bond nor actual force in the exercise of sovereignty” (178). Here in a way Rousseau sums up that individual rights are not good for the state if they conflict with the community because they weaken the bond between the citizens and power of the sovereign. That people should be expected to give up certain rights as individuals for the benefit of the community as a whole. Through the lack of emphasis on individual rights, one can start to see how in certain situations this can be not only repressive and demanding, but also…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s key viewpoint is that all men are born free, but end up being in chains everywhere in the course of their lives (Rousseau and Cole 2 ). Rousseau argues that modern political states repress the basic freedoms which men possess as their birthright. These political states then lead men into the civil society in which the civil freedoms of men are not secure. Most importantly, Rousseau points out that the legitimacy of political authority can only be a product of social that all citizens agree upon motivated by the need for mutual preservation. Throughout the book, Rousseau makes key distinctions that make the basis of the discussions in this essay.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays