“In the last 30 years the unequal distribution of income in Britain has increased at an alarming rate” To what extent do you agree with this statement?
I agree with the statement in a way. Although I don’t think that the unequal distribution of wealth has increased too dramatically, I think the fact that it has increased at all is alarming, because by looking at these figures (the top tenth of the population have a higher share of the wealth than before (from27%-31%) whereas the bottom 2 tenths have decreased.
It is clear that they need to be changed, and what is also surprising is that Labour were in charge for the majority of this time, and are meant to be the party who are more left wing and socialist, therefore more inclined to help the masses and the working and lowest classes.
Also - 62% of people in Britain have a household income that is lower than the national income. I feel that this is wrong. I don’t think society should be like a communist ideal where everyone is exactly equal, but think that the top 38% earn too much of the income. I think this happens because of a continuing cycle – people who struggle for work will not be able to provide such a good education (private schools, text books, parental support, tutors) to their children who will therefore struggle to match the grades of children of richer parents, and will struggle with lack of inheritance and experience possibly of university to draw on, and are more likely to end up working in similar lower paid jobs unable to break the cycle.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After watching the video, "Wealth Inequality in America", published by Politizane, I was surprised when finding out that only the top one percent of America has 40 percent of all the nation's wealth. It was also surprising to discover that the top one percent owns half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual bonds, while the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only half a percent of these investments. One of the notions I had that was challenged by the video was the amount of money the wealthy actually have compared to the rest of the classes. I was aware that wealth mostly distributed to the wealthy class, but I never imagined that the division between the wealthy class and the rest of the classes would be so huge. Its incredible that the CEO's…
- 227 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
‘Structural inequality refers to the unequal distribution of power, wealth and social status between individuals and groups in any society’ and evidence of structural inequality has been apparent throughout modern Australian history between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous (Holmes, Hughes & Julian 2015, p.42). If the Australian society is to learn from past mistakes strategies need to be applied to make significate changes with the help of statistics. Statistics have provided integral information to enable Australian governments and Indigenous communities to work together to identify needs, set goals and monitor progress to reduce structural inequality and improve the future and wellbeing of the Indigenous Australians (World Bank 2000).…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore”, Frank shows the influences in Americans’ lives in different classes by the disparity between the rich and the poor. He arouses people’s consciousness for the “rising inequality” which is being polarized and has been causing immense damages to Americans, no matter which class they are. It is true that the “Income Inequality” in America is very obvious and affecting more and more people. Indeed, “we should just agree that it’s a bad thing”, however, are we able to do something concrete to deal with it effectively? Is the” rising inequality really required in the name of fairness”? I stand neutral towards Frank’s opinion.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Conclusion It is a common belief among numerous scholars and common individuals alike that income inequality in the economy is a good thing for everyone. These individuals argue that income inequality improves the economy as the rich keep getting richer. One such person is George Will who argues in his article that income inequality is not a probe but a solution as it works for the benefit of the poor and the rich in equal measure. George and other like-minded people claim that practices that further affect the income inequality such as outsourcing lead to the reduction of the costs of goods.…
- 1634 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In the essay “Inequality Has Been Going on Forever... but That Doesn’t Mean It’s Inevitable”, David Leonhardt argues that despite the persistent trend of income inequality in the U.S. and throughout history, it is not impossible to change that inequality. He writes that the professor, Thomas Piketty points out the process in which inequality rises and the near inevitability of it. Leonhardt tells of his conversations with Piketty and Piketty’s idea on the possible way to solve inequality, which is to put a global wealth tax that is specifically for income inequality. Leonhardt finds this solution politically improbable and instead advises that the government changes the taxation of the wealthy, healthcare, how we manage the Department of Transportation,…
- 827 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the past thirty-three years the gap between the rich, middle-class, and impoverished has become much more prominent. At the early signs of this great economic divergence, people mistook it for a short slip-up in our nations economy, but now the divergence has become a reality of life itself. There were signs that the indifference was beginning to disappear in 2011 when The Occupy Wall Street movement occurred, but its hard to know if these will have any lasting effect in our nations future. We tend to think of America growing more equal in society not less, and it has in ways such as gender equality, equality amongst races, marriage…
- 2351 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
|inequality between gender and class and also, the extent of poverty in the current British context. I will also cover causes of |…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The social structure of Britain has been highly influenced by the concept of social class. In sociology, the term ‘social class’ is most often used to refer to the primary system of social stratification found in modern capitalist societies. Social stratification refers to ‘the presence [in society] of distinct social groups which are ranked one above the other in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth’.…
- 1749 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The wealth in the United States is not equal, and is most all at the top of the social stratification ladder. The biggest changes in the class system is that poverty is increasing, the middle class is shrinking, and the rich are getting richer. The years since 1973 have been known as the Age of Growing Inequality. Moving into a post-industrial society now in the 21st century has caused for an even great growth in inequality. Globalization has caused companies to outsource work, lay workers in factories off because of the new technologies being used, and cause a larger wealth…
- 433 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Wealth inequality can be described as a lot of different things. The one that comes to mind the most though is the gap between the rich and poor. This gap is made up of a variety of different things. The one that comes to many minds is the tax code system. In order to correct the wealth gap in the United States efforts should be made to change the tax codes to close the gap between the rich and poor.…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Wealth inequality can be described as the unequal distribution of assets within a population. The United States exhibits wider disparities of wealth between rich and poor than any other major developed nation,” (www.inequality.org) There are two factors that I believe contribute to the wealth gap are income and race inequalities. As the gaps widen within those two factors, the wealth gap in the United States continues to grow exponentially.…
- 555 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If people aren’t earning enough a lot of money, all they need to do is work harder they’ll get ahead.…
- 1104 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Former assistant secretary in the Department of Health and Human Services, Peter Edelman, argues that "inequality in the distribution of wealth is a major cause of poverty," he also adds that the problem is getting worse (Capitalism Causes Poverty). "Twenty years ago, the wealthiest one percent had as much income as the poorest 20 percent of the population; today, that one percent controls as much wealth as the poorest 35 percent" (Capitalism Causes Poverty). This is one illustration of how it is harder today for those in poverty to rise higher in society because the wealthiest people control a substantially larger amount of money than they did before. Also the article from the Economist, Meritocracy in America, shows this uneven balance in wealth by stating "In 2001 the top 1% of households earned 20% of all income and held 33.4% of all net worth" (Meritocracy in America). The article also declares that the top 1% has not controlled this much wealth since before the depression (Meritocracy in America). Once again this shows how it has become incredibly hard for people to achieve a state of living above the poverty level. More evidence to support this argument, once again, comes from the article Meritocracy in America. The article proclaims that between 1979 and 2000 "the income of households in the lowest fifth grew by 6.4% while that of households in the top fifth grew by 70%. The family income of the top 1% grew by 184%. Back in 1979 the average income of the top 1% was 133 times that of the bottom 20%; by 2000 the income of the top 1% had risen to 189 times that of the bottom fifth" (Meritocracy in America). Again this shows how hard it is to ascend to a higher level in society. A study was done by Thomas hertz, an economist at American University in Washington DC. He studied families over…
- 2924 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
Over the last 3 decades we have seen a bigger gap between rich and poor in this country in incomes earned and wealth created. Never before the gap has been so much larger than it is today and it’s getting even bigger. I can’t recall a country that survived by having 99 percent of its population in the bottom while the other 1 percent got all the income. We have lost our world respect in regards to Capitalism. For decades many in this country advocated that Capitalism is the way to go and laughed at some European nations who are Socialist as if they are naïve and don’t know what’s best for their people. As it turns out there is actually a lesser income gap between rich and the poor in countries such as France not to mention lesser government debt and same amount of taxes as United States even though some would argue they pay much higher taxes in Europe which is not true.…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As mentioned previously, the Australian distributions do look much better than majority of OECD countries (Table 1). This is why I’ve recommended examining the Australian Gini coefficient in the past, to witness what truly has occurred (Figure 2). Figure 2 indicates the cumulative picture is of an upward trend, therefore the inequality is increasing across the years. However, there have also been years in which the inequality rate decreased, only to eventually increase back up into unequal rates (ABS considers this fact as insignificant change).…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays