Preview

Social And Economic Benefits Of Prohibition In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social And Economic Benefits Of Prohibition In The United States
In every country, it is important for the government to balance the three policies that they have in place, including prohibition, legalization and decriminalization. For each of these policy, there are certain benefits and costs that makes one suitable than the others. Take prohibition for example, it is ‘’refers to a policy of criminalization, whereby the production, manufacture, growing, and possession of drugs are violation of one or more criminal statutes’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 437). In addition, prohibition helped send ‘’a symbolic message about virtues valued by most Americans’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 443). Compared to other policies, prohibition offers a few advantages that others simply do not have. For starter, this particular policy would limit the number of users who use illegal or unhealthy drugs in society. As we all know, the effects of some of the drugs are detrimental to the health of the users …show more content…
As suggested by Ethan Nadelmann, prohibitionist policies have resulted in ‘’serious social and economic costs’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 444). Besides the costs in increased crime, nearly $20 billion in taxpayers’ money have been spent on DEA programs and others. Not only that, prohibitionist policies is the primary reason that drugs have become more concentrated, since they would take up less space and reduce the visibility of their trafficking (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 447). While the costs seems to outweigh the advantages when it comes to prohibitionist policies, I still think prohibition would be a better option than legalization and decriminalization. Because at the end of the day, I’m not sure if our country is ready for a society where illegal drugs become commodities. Besides, it is literally impossible for our government to systematically regulate and control the amount of drugs on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    statesman and voter as to what the Act was prohibiting. He then proceeds to explain that…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prohibition was the result used by the government to help ration fruits and grain so as to aid those fighting in the war. Prohibition was first introduced in Pince Edward island in 1901as well as the Yukon and Newfoundland, during the first world war one. At that time prohibition was seen as a social sacrifice to help with the war. An aspect of the prohibition era was that because united states were under a constitutional amendment they could manufacture and sell any type of alcohol. this lead to smugglers to depart Canada with shiploads of alcohol. Additionally, I don't really think that Prohibition is that significant but in general just created more problems than it solved. with the crime increasing in the economy it was a terrible idea…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition and the War on Drugs are not so different; both are useless and cause more harm than good to the economy. In time, as what was shown during Prohibition, this “war” will die out. Many “unions” were created to fight the consumption of Alcohol and is shown today for use of Marijuana. Prohibition and the war on drugs have also caused much unnecessary violence that could have easily been avoided if these items were just legalized.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years of 1918-1920 Canada had a brief moment of prohibition. During this period in time drinking alcohol was considered illegal. As a result many negative and positive side effects had taken place in the country. Although the ban of alcohol may have been able to do great good on Canada, the people’s reaction to it completely flipped it around. Although it may have been overall a disastrous idea; Canada still managed to benefit from prohibition just like the United States (maybe even more).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first and only time in U.S. history an amendment to the constitution was repealed occurred January 1919, in the United States. This amendment was based on the ban of the manufacture of alcohol. This ban of alcohol leads to many questions but there is one main question. Why did America change its mind? America changed its mind and repealed Prohibition for three reasons; crime, law enforcement, and economics.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prohibition movement shows that no matter what restrictions are put into place, if people want to do something, they will find a way to do it. Alcohol may have been banned nationwide, but that didn’t stop people from enjoying themselves and doing what they wanted to do. This same exact thing happens today as well.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you look through modern political history we see the government try, and fail to contain alcohol, and drugs. Prohibition in the 1920s only made alcohol more dangerous, and gave the market to the mafia who gladly took it over. It’s now 2017, and we are 46 years into Nixon’s failing “War on Drugs”. The only thing that has happened is increased drug use, the drugs have gotten more dangerous to use, and the drug cartels have taken over the market, and that’s not even mentioning the fact that our “limited government” in the “land of the free and the home of the brave” are putting people in cages for 20+ years for injecting a substance into their own bodies, on their own accord, on their own personal time, it is one of the most contradictory statements…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The alcohol industry is one of the largest to contribute to the U.S economy. Its reported that the alcohol industry generates about 475 billion dollars annually alone. If prohibition was never repealed, the U.S could have excess amounts of money. Prohibition, which was voted on December 17, 1917, stopped the production, transportation, and sale of alcohol. In the intention to stop violence caused my intoxication, prohibition only promoted more violence and crime throughout the country. Bootleggers (People who sold illegal alcoholic beverages) were selling alcohol to the very own men who voted to ban alcohol. Corruption didn’t occur just inside the congress…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason I believe that the approach to criminalization of drugs would not be feasible is because most, if not all, federal drug laws are questionable in character in terms of effectiveness. An example of this is the failure of prohibition in the 1920's. Fast forward to now, this century old issue has now morphed into the war on drugs. The federal government has limited power in that it can only exercise the powers that have been delegated to it. According to the 10th amendment, the rest of the powers are given to the states and the people to protect American democracy. (http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2080345_2080344_2080384,00.html). Therefore, implementing certain drug laws is not a promising approach to combat crime in the United States.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prohibition in the United States was an across the nation established prohibition on the deal, creation, importation, and transportation of mixed refreshments that stayed set up from 1920 to 1933. It was advanced by the "dry" crusaders, a development drove by rustic Protestants and social Progressives in the Democratic and Republican gatherings, and was composed by the Anti-Saloon League, and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Prohibition was ordered under the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Empowering enactment, known as the Volstead Act, set down the guidelines for upholding the boycott and characterized the sorts of mixed drinks that were disallowed. For instance, religious employments of wine were permitted.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government involvement in all the aspects of Prohibition was also a cause the era was cynical period of time. President Hoover once said“Our country has deliberately undertaken a great social and economic experiment, noble in motive and far-reaching in purpose”(“18th and 21st Amendments”). Hoover saying this reflected how the government thought adding the eighteenth amendment would change America for the better. Their optimism overshadowed the failures in the amendment and all other anti prohibition laws which started backfiring in the government.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though, one could argue the abundance of failure that came out of the prohibition, it also provided success for Americans in the long run. It was almost could be seen as an American chance to hit the reset button. Giving us the opportunity to take a step back and see the negative side effects we were causing to ourselves. During the Prohibition the consumption of alcohol never stopped, it did decrease significantly. This pattern continued decades after the Prohibition ended. The Prohibition is a piece of history we could learn from: yes; it was a failure, yes; it did increase crime, and yes, those who were claiming to be helping American society threw the idea of Prohibition, were usually doing so to push their own political agenda, it did,…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, prohibition did managed to repair some of the damages made by alcoholic Americans. Deaths and arrest from alcohol and drunkenness dropped significantly during the 1920s as seen by this graph. In 1920, deaths by alcohol use dropped from 7 % of an 100,000 population to 1% during a thirteen year period (Hall 1167).…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    prohibition during the 1920s that continued until 1933. The analysis presents data that shows an increase on the following: Consumption of alcoholic beverages per capita during 1922 to 1929, the total expenditure on distilled spirits, the homicide rate, and the increase of crime rates. The sources of this analysis spawn from a great amount of economic journals, treatises, and even a book written by author of the analysis himself that focuses on the exact topic: the economic effects of…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays